Goal Programming-Based Two-Tier Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Wind Turbine Selection

References

• Bagočius, V., E. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2014. Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive multiplicative utility function. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 20:590–99. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.932836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseer, M., J. Meyer, M. Alam, and S. Rehman. 2015. Wind speed and power characteristics for Jubail industrial city, Saudi Arabia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 52:1193–204. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseer, M., J. Meyer, S. Rehman, M. Alam, L. Al-Hadhrami, and A. Lashin. 2016. Performance evaluation of cup-anemometers and wind speed characteristics analysis. Renewable Energy 86:733–44. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekele, A., and A. Ramayya. 2013. Site specific design optimization of horizontal axis wind turbine based on minimum cost of energy for Adama I wind farm. International Journal Engineering Researcher Technological 2:862–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bencherif, M., B. Brahmi, and A. Chikhaoui. 2014. Optimum selection of wind turbines. Sciences Journal Energy Engineering 2:36–46. doi:10.11648/j.sjee.20140204.12.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., A. Mehmani, J. Zhang, and A. Messac. 2016. Market suitability and performance tradeoffs offered by commercial wind turbines across differing wind regimes. Energies 9:1–31. doi:10.3390/en9050352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., J. Zhang, A. Messac, and L. Castillo. 2013. Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions. Renewable Energy 52:273–82. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., J. Wang, H. Jiang, and X. Shi. 2013. Intelligent optimized wind resource assessment and wind turbines selection in Huitengxile of Inner Mongolia, China. Applications Energy 109:239–53. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, M., J. Yi, P. Mazidi, L. Cheng, and J. A. Guo. 2017. Parameter selection method for wind turbine health management through SCADA data. Energies 10 (2):253. doi:10.3390/en10020253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eke, G., and J. Onyewudiala. 2012. Optimization of wind turbine blades using genetic algorithm. Glob Journal Researcher Engineering 10:22–26.
   Google Scholar
• El-Shimy, M. 2010. Optimal site matching of wind turbine generator: Case study of the Gulf of Suez region in Egypt. Renewable Energy 35:1870–78. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firuzabad, M., and A. Dobakhshari. 2009. Reliability-based selection of wind turbines for large-scale wind farms. World Academic Sciences Engineering Technological 49:734–40.
   Google Scholar
• Flavel, R. B. 1976. A new goal programming formulation. vol. 4 of Omega, 731–32. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., and T. Saaty. 1955. The computational algorithm for the parametric objective function. Naval Researcher Logist Quarterly 2:39–45. doi:10.1002/nav.3800020106.
   Google Scholar
• Global Wind Statistics, GWEC 2016, http://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/1_Global-Installed-Wind-Power-Capacity-MW-%E2%80%93-Regional-Distribution.jpg (Accessed on 28 February 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, E. L. 1981. On fuzzy goal programming. Decisions Sciences 12:522–31. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00102.x.
   Google Scholar
• Helgason, K. 2012. Selecting optimum location and type of wind turbines in Iceland. Iceland: Master’s These, Reykjavík University, Reykjavík.
   Google Scholar
• Ignizio, J. P. 1976. Goal programming and extensions. Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. F., and N. Tamiz. 2010. Practical goal programming. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jowder, F. 2009. Wind power analysis and site matching of wind turbine generators in Kingdom of Bahrain. Applications Energy 86:538–45. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jureczko, M., M. Pawlak, and A. Mezyk. 2005. Optimisation of wind turbine blades. Journal Materials Processing Technological 167:463–71. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. 2015. An automated decision-making approach for assortment of wind turbines—A case study of turbines in the range of 500 kW to 750 kW. International Journal Computation Network Technological 3:75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., and S. Rehman On the use of unified and-or fuzzy aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision making in wind farm design process using wind turbines in 500 kW–750 kW range. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 10-15 June, 2012a; pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., and S. Rehman On the use of Werners fuzzy aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision making in wind farm design process using wind turbines in 1000 kW–1200 kW range. In Proceedings of the International Clean Energy Conference, Quebec, Canada, 10-12 Sept. 2012b; pp. 163–70.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., and S. Rehman. 2013. Iterative non-deterministic algorithms in on-shore wind farm design: A brief survey. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 19:370–84. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., M. Hung, H. Kang, and W. Pearn. 2012. A wind turbine evaluation model under a multi-criteria decision making environment. Energy Conversion and Management 64:289–300. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K., M. Schmidt, S. Shelton, and S. Stewart. 2007. Site specific optimization of rotor/generator sizing of wind turbines. American Social Mechanisms Engineering. doi:10.1115/ES2007-36144.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, F., F. Manzano-Agugliaro, S. López-Márquez, Q. Hernández-Escobedo, and C. Gil. 2014. Wind turbine selection for wind farm layout using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Expert Systems Applications 41:6585–95. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes, C., and F. Munteanu Optimal selection of wind turbine for a specific area. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Brasov, Romania, 20–22 May 2010; pp. 1224–29.
   Google Scholar
• Perkin, S., D. Garrett, and P. Jensson. 2015. Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: A case-study for Búrfell, Iceland. Renewable Energy 75:165–72. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, S., and N. Al-Abbadi. 2009. Wind power characteristics on the north west coast of Saudi Arabia. Energy Environment 20:1257–70. doi:10.1260/0958-305X.20/21.8/1.1257.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, S., M. Baseer, J. Meyer, M. Alam, M. Alhems, A. Lashin, and N. AlArifi. 2016. Suitability of utilizing small horizontal axis wind turbines for off grid loads in Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 34:449–67. doi:10.1177/0144598716630170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, S., and S. Khan. 2016. Fuzzy logic based multi-criteria wind turbine selection strategy—A case study of Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Energy 9 (11):872.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, C. 1991. Handbook of critical issues in goal programming. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modell 9 (3):161–76. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarja, J., and V. Halonen. 2013. Wind turbine selection criteria: A customer perspective. Journal Energy and Power Engineering 7:1795–802.
   Google Scholar
• Shirgholami, Z., S. Zangeneh, and M. Bortolini. 2016. Decision system to support the practitioners in the wind farm design: A case study for Iran mainland. Sustain Energy Technological Assessment 16:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamiz, M., D. Jones, and E. El-Darzi. 1993. A review of goal programming and its applications. Annals Operational Researcher 58:39–53. doi:10.1007/BF02032309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsey, L. A. 1998. Integer programming. USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar