2,347
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Religion, Robots and Rectitude: Communicative Affordances for Spiritual Knowledge and Community

References

  • Andrews, T. 2016. Meet the robot monk spreading the teachings of Buddhism around China. The Washington Post, April 27. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/04/27/meet-the-robot-monk-spreading-the-teachings-of-buddhism-around-china/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a59977749d3c
  • Berriman, L., and G. Mascheroni. 2018. Exploring the affordances of smart toys and connected play in practice. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444818807119.
  • Boyd, D. 2010. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 47–66). New York, UK: Routledge.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee. 2014. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
  • Bucher, T., and A. Helmond. 2018. The affordances of social media platforms. In SAGE handbook of social media, ed. J. Burgess, A. Marwick, and T. Poell., 223–53. London: Sage.
  • Bucher, T., and A. Helmond. 2017. The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The sage handbook of social media(pp. 233–253). London: SAGE Publications.
  • Burlamaqui, L., and A. Dong. 2015. The use and misuse of the concept of affordance. In Design computing and cognition, ed. J. S. Gero and S. Hanna, 295–311. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Campbell, H. 2010. When religion meets new media. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cheng, X. (2017) The current state of chinese buddhism. Voice of Longquan. http://eng.longquanzs.org/xuecheng/writings/77389.htm
  • Cheong, P. H. 2017. The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization. New Media & Society 19 (1):25–33. doi:10.1177/1461444816649913.
  • Cheong, P. H. & Ess, C. (2012) Religion 2.0? Relational and hybridizing pathways in religion, social media and culture. In P.H. Cheong, P. Fischer-Nielsen, P., S. Gelfgren, & C. Ess. (Eds.), Digital religion, social media and culture: Perspectives, practices, futures. pp. 1-24. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Cheong, P. H., J. M. Hwang, and B. H. Brummans. 2014. Transnational immanence: The autopoietic co-constitution of a Chinese spiritual organization through mediated communication. Information, Communication & Society 17 (1):7–25. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.833277.
  • Davis, J. L., and J. B. Chouinard. 2016. Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36 (4):241–48. doi:10.1177/0270467617714944.
  • Einstein, M. 2011. The evolution of religious branding. Social Compass 58 (3):331–38. doi:10.1177/0037768611412138.
  • Ellison, N., and J. Vitak. 2015. Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of psychology of communication technology (pp. 205-227). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118426456.
  • Ess, C., A. Kawabata, and H. Kurosaki. 2007. Cross-cultural perspectives on religion and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (3):939–55. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2007.12.issue-3.
  • Evans, S. K., K. E. Pearce, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2016. Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1):35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180.
  • Faraj, S., and B. Azad. 2012. The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world, ed. P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, and J. Kallinikos, 237–58. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2):219–45. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
  • Gaver, W. W. 1991. Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 79–84. April. New York, NY: ACM.
  • George, A. L., A. Bennett, S. M. Lynn-Jones, and S. E. Miller. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Geraci, R. M. 2008. Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (1):138–66. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfm101.
  • Geraci, R. M. 2013. Robotics and religion. In Encyclopedia of sciences and religions, ed. A. Runehov and L. Oviedo, 2067–72. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing, ed. R. Shaw and J. Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gn, J. 2016. Designing affection: On the curious case of machine cuteness. In The aesthetics and affects of cuteness, ed. J. D. Dale, J. Goggin, J. Leyda, M. P. McIntyre, and D. Negra, 185–203. New York: Routledge.
  • Graves, L. 2007. The affordances of blogging: A case study in culture and technological effects. Journal of Communication Inquiry 31 (4):331–46. doi:10.1177/0196859907305446.
  • Greene, P. D., and L. Wei. 2004. Introduction: Mindfulness and change in Buddhist musical traditions. Asian Music 35 (2):1–6.
  • Grieve, G. P., and D. Veidlinger, eds. 2014. Buddhism, the internet, and digital media: The pixel in the lotus. New York: Routledge.
  • Guzman, A. L. ed. 2018. Human machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Helles, R. 2013. Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication 1:14–19. doi:10.1177/2050157912459496.
  • Hutchby, I. 2001. Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35 (2):441–56. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000219.
  • Hutchby, I., and S. Barnett. 2005. Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation. Discourse Studies 7 (2):147–71. doi:10.1177/1461445605050364.
  • Katz, J. E., and M. Aakhus, eds. 2002. Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ke, Y. 2016. Finding robot Monk Xian’er. understanding Buddhism in Longquan animation. Journal of Visual and Media Anthropology 2 (1):7–24.
  • Kennewell, S. 2001. Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10:101–16. doi:10.1080/14759390100200105.
  • Kluver, R., and P. H. Cheong. 2007. Technological modernization, the Internet, and religion in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (3):1122–42. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2007.12.issue-3.
  • Leonardi, P. M. 2011. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly 35:147–67. doi:10.2307/23043493.
  • Leonardi, P. M. 2013. When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly 37:749–75. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
  • Lu, S., and J. Robertson. 2016. Temple’s chatty robot monk dispenses Buddhist wisdom. CNN, May 30. https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/china-buddhism-robot-monk/index.html.
  • Mascheroni, G., and J. Vincent. 2016. Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions. Mobile Media & Communication 4 (3):310–26. doi:10.1177/2050157916639347.
  • Norman, D. A. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic books.
  • Schrock, A. R. 2015. Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication 9:1229–46.
  • Sherwood, H. 2016. Robot Monk to spread Buddhist wisdom to the digital generation. The Guardian, April 26. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/26/robot-monk-to-spread-buddhist-wisdom-to-the-digital-generation.
  • Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sun, Y. 2011. The Chinese Buddhist ecology in post-Mao China: Contours, types and dynamics. Social Compass 58 (4):498–510. doi:10.1177/0037768611421135.
  • Tamatea, L. 2010. Online Buddhist and Christian responses to artificial intelligence. Zygon® 45 (4):979–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01145.x.
  • Tatlow, D. K. 2016. A Robot Monk captivates China, mixing spirituality with artificial intelligence. The New York Times, April 27. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/world/asia/china-robot-monk-temple.html.
  • The Pew Research Center. 2012. Buddhists. https://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-buddhist/.
  • Šabanović, S. 2014. Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics. Social Studies of Science 44 (3):342–67. doi:10.1177/0306312713509704.
  • Travagnin, S. 2016. Introduction: Religion and media in China: Volume objectives, challenges and themes. In Religion and media in China, ed. S. Travagnin, 15–30. New York: Routledge.
  • Treem, J. W., and P. M. Leonardi. 2013. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association 36 (1):143–89. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130.
  • Varvaloucas, E. 2018. AI, karma and our robot future. https://tricycle.org/magazine/artificial-intelligence-karma-robot-future/.
  • Whittaker, K. 2015. Longquan Temple develops Robo-Monk to interact with visitors. The Beijinger, October 9. https://www.thebeijinger.com/blog/2015/10/09/longquan-temple-develops-robo-monk-interact-visitors
  • Xinhua. 2018. Robot monk updated by Chinese tech firms. May 12. http://www.china.org.cn/business/2018-05/12/content_51243619.htm.
  • Yin, R. K. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.