Multi-Agent Cooperation for an Active Perception Based on Driving Behavior: Application in a Car-Following Behavior

References

• Allen, T. M., H. Lunenfeld, and G. J. Alexander. 1971. Driver information needs. Highway Research Board 366:102–115).
   Google Scholar
• Bennajeh, A., S. Bechikh, L. Ben-Said, and S. Aknine. 2018a. Anticipation model based on a modified fuzzy logic approach. Journal of IET Intelligent Transport Systems 13:230–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennajeh, A., S. Bechikh, L. Ben-Said, and S. Aknine. 2018b. A fuzzy logicbased anticipation car-following model. In LNCS transactions on computational collective intelligence, 11120.
   Google Scholar
• Bennajeh, A., S. Bechikh, L. Ben-Said, and S. Aknine. 2019. Bi-level decision-making modeling for an autonomous driver agent: Application in the car-following driving behavior. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 33 (13):1157–78. doi:10.1080/08839514.2019.1673018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölöni, L., and D. Turgut. 2005.  YAES: A modular simulator for mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, 169–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and C. Wang. 2007. Vehicle safety distance warning system: A novel algorithm for vehicle safety distance calculating between moving cars. In Vehicular technology conference.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A., and J. Renz. 2008. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. Handbook of Knowledge Representation 3:551–96.
   Google Scholar
• Donges, E. 1978. A two-level model of driver steering behavior. Journal of Human Factors 20:691–707. doi:10.1177/001872087802000607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doniec, A., R. Mandiau, S. Piechowiak, and S. Espie. 2008. A behavioral multi-agent model for road traffic simulation. Journal of Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 21 (8):1443–54. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 1995a. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37:32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 1995b. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37:65–84. doi:10.1518/001872095779049499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 2000. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In Situation awareness analysis and measurement, ed. M. R. Endsley and D. J. Garland, 1–24. Mahwah, New Jersey, États-Unis: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, T. W. 1963. Human factor considerations in Traffic flow theory. Highway Research Record 15:60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York, États-Unis: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ketenci, U., R. Brémond, J-M. Auberlet, and E. GrislinRech. 2014. Drivers with limited perception: model and application to traffic simulation. Journal of Rech Transport Security 30: 49–63. doi:10.4074/S0761898014001046.
   Google Scholar
• Lertworawanich, T. 2006. Safe-following distance based on the car-following model. International seminar on intelligent transport system (ITS) in road network operations, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 14-16.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., D. Turgutb, and L. Bölöni. 2014. Modeling the strategic behavior of drivers for multi-lane highway driving. Journal of Intelligent Transport Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Michon, J. A. 1985. A critical view of driver behavior models. What do we know, what should we do? In Human behavior and traffic safety, ed. L. Evans and R. Schwing, 485–521. New York, États-Unis: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSIM. 2005. The next generation simulation (NGSIM) computer (rapport technique). Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, M., L. Ehlert, and L. Rothkrantz. 2001. A reactive driving agent for microscopic traffic simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Pipes, L. A. 1953. An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. Journal of Applied Physics 24:274–81. doi:10.1063/1.1721265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranney, T. A. 1994. Models of driving behavior: A review of their evolution. Accident Analysis & Prevention 26 (6):p.733–750. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90051-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T. Q., C. Y. Li, and H. J. Huang. 2010. A new car-following model with the consideration of the driver’s forecast effect. Physics Letters A374:3951–56. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.07.062.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., J. Kearney, J. Cremer, and P. Willemsen. 2005. Steering behaviors for autonomous vehicles in virtual environments. In IEEE proceedings virtual reality.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M., G. Grinstein, and D. Keim. 2010. Interactive data visualization: Foundations, techniques, and application. In Proceedings of human perception and information processing, 73–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, M., and N. R. Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10:2. doi:10.1017/S0269888900008122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L.-J., C. Tian, -H.-H. Sun, and W.-N. Liu. 2012. A new car-following model with consideration of anticipation driving behavior. Nonlinear Dynamics 70:1205–11. doi:10.1007/s11071-012-0524-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar