Impact of Factors Influencing Cyber Threats on Autonomous Vehicles

References

• Adams, M. D., S. D. Hitefield, B. Hoy, M. C. Fowler, and T. C. Clancy. 2013. Application of cybernetics and control theory for a new paradigm in cybersecurity. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1311:0257.
   Google Scholar
• Amoozadeh, M., A. Raghuramu, C. N. Chuah, D. Ghosal, H. M. Zhang, J. Rowe, and K. Levitt. 2015. Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving. IEEE Communications Magazine 53 (6):126–32. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2015.7120028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., et al. 2014. Rand corp., autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. 18–28. ; Sarwant Singh, The 10 Social and Tech Trends That Could Shape the Next Decade, FORBES (May 12, 2014, 12:54 PM), http://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2014/05/12/the-top-10-mega-trendsof-the-decade/. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR400/RR443-1/RAND_RR443-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., N. Kalra, and M. Wachs. 2009. Liability and regulation of autonomous vehicle technologies. RAND Corporation, Berkeley, CA. http://www. rand. org/pubs/external_ publications/EP20090427. html.
   Google Scholar
• Bagloee, S. A., M. Tavana, M. Asadi, and T. Oliver. 2016. Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation 24 (4):284–303. doi:10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, C., J. Tan, J. Ramjohn, and L. Bauer. July 2017. Self-driving cars and data collection: Privacy perceptions of networked autonomous vehicles. Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS).
   Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F., A. Shariff, and I. Rahwan. 2016. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science. 352 (6293):pp. 1573–1574. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky, J. S. 2016. Autonomous vehicle regulation: How an uncertain legal landscape may hit the brakes on self-driving cars. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31:851.
   Google Scholar
• Bullmore, E. T., B. Horwitz, G. D. Honey, M. J. Brammer, S. C. R. Williams, and T. Sharma. 2000. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? NeuroImage 11:289–301. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttigieg, R., M. Farrugia, and C. Meli. December 2017. Security issues in controller area networks in automobiles. Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA), 2017 18th International Conference, IEEE, 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Caltagirone, S. 2015. The cost of bad threat intelligence. viewed 6 February 2017. http://www.activeresponse.org/the-cost-of-bad-threat-intelligence/
   Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A. 2004. Discriminant validity. In Encyclopedia of social science research methods, 273. doi:10.4135/9781412950589.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. D., and A. O. Herdman. 2012. Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods 15:17–32. doi:10.1177/1094428110392383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsten, P., T. R. Andel, M. Yampolskiy, J. T. McDonald, and S. Russ. September 2015. A system to recognize intruders in controller area network (CAN). Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cybersecurity Research. BCS Learning & Development Ltd, 111–14.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., Y. Gao, S. Lefevre, and F. Borrelli. September 2014. Stochastic predictive control of autonomous vehicles in uncertain environments. 12th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, 712–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cavoli, C., B. Phillips, T. Cohen, and P. Jones. 2017. Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles a literature review. UCL Transport Institute January.
   Google Scholar
• Christin, D. 2016. Privacy in mobile participatory sensing: Current trends and future challenges. Journal of Systems and Software 116:57–68. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., P. Jones, and C. Cavoli. 2017. Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles. UCL Transport Institute: London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. A., K. D. Logue, and B. C. Pilz. 2016. A survey of legal issues arising from the deployment of autonomous and connected vehicles. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 23:191.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M., and M. A. Regan. October 2015. Autonomous vehicles: Human factors issues and future research. Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road Safety Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, I. F. D. P. F. S. J., B. Endicott-Popovsky, and J. Wendleberger. 2002. White paper #2 – Tranforming cybersecurity research: The deming analogy, draft. University of Washington, Tech. Rep..
   Google Scholar
• Dariz, L., M. Selvatici, M. Ruggeri, G. Costantino, and F. Martinelli. June 2017. Trade-off analysis of safety and security in CAN bus communication. 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, MT-ITS 2017, Naples, Italy, 226–31.
   Google Scholar
• Douma, F., and S. A. Palodichuk. 2012. Criminal liability issues created by autonomous vehicles, 52. Santa Clara Law Review 1157.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. 1987. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (397):171–85. doi:10.2307/2289144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanhawi, M., M. Simic, and R. Jazar. 2015. In the passenger seat: Investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 7 (3):4–17. doi:10.1109/MITS.2015.2405571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eric Newcomer. November 22, 2017. Uber paid hackers to delete stolen data on 57 million people. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-21/uber-concealed-cyberattack-that-exposed-57-million-people-s-data
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, G., D. Bowman, and R. Llaneras. 2014. Distracted driver performance to multiple alerts in a multiple-conflict scenario. Human Factors 56 (8):1497–505. doi:10.1177/0018720814531785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, E., S. Beiker, and B. Lenz. 2015. Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility. European Journal of Futures Research 3 (1):11. doi:10.1007/s40309-015-0067-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, M. R., and R. D. McLeod. 2015. Bluetooth in intelligent transportation systems: A survey. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 13 (3):143–53. doi:10.1007/s13177-014-0092-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galceran, E., A. G. Cunningham, R. M. Eustice, and E. Olson. 2017. Multipolicy decision-making for autonomous driving via changepoint-based behavior prediction: Theory and experiment. Autonomous Robots 41 (6):1367–82. doi:10.1007/s10514-017-9619-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005 December The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horsedrawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(4):445–76. doi: 10.1080/09537320500357319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, X., H. Liang, B. Yu, P. Zhao, L. He, and R. Huang. 2017. A scenario-adaptive driving behavior prediction approach to urban autonomous driving. Applied Sciences 7 (4):426. doi:10.3390/app7040426.
   Google Scholar
• Glancy, D. J. 2015. Autonomous and automated and connected cars-oh my: First generation autonomous cars in the legal ecosystem. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 16:619.
   Google Scholar
• Gosman, C., C. Dobre, and F. Pop. May 2017. Privacy-preserving data aggregation in intelligent transportation systems. Integrated Network and Service Management (IM), 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium, IEEE, 1059–64.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L. 2018. Steering (or not) through the social and legal implications of autonomous vehicles. Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 11:81.
   Google Scholar
• Haddrell, M. 2016. Towards an autonomous vehicle enabled society: Cyber attacks and countermeasures.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2):139–52. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
   Google Scholar
• Hamida, E. B., H. Noura, and W. Znaidi. 2015. Security of cooperative intelligent transport systems: Standards, threats analysis and cryptographic countermeasures. Electronics 4 (3):380–423. doi:10.3390/electronics4030380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., D. R. Billings, K. E. Oleson, J. Y. Chen, E. De Visser, and R. Parasuraman. 2011. A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of human-robot trust (No. ARL-TR-5857). Army research lab aberdeen proving ground md human research and engineering directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Hansman, S., and R. Hunt. 2005. A taxonomy of network and computer attacks. Computers & Security 24 (1):31–43. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q., X. Meng, and R. Qu. May 2017. Survey on cybersecurity of CAV. Cooperative Positioning and Service (CPGP), 2017 Forum. IEEE, 351–54.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., and T. K. Dijkstra. 2015. ADANCO 2.0. Kleve, Germany: Composite Modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Kamhoua, C., A. Martin, D. K. Tosh, K. A. Kwiat, C. Heitzenrater, and S. Sengupta. November 2015. Cyber-threats information sharing in cloud computing: A game theoretic approach. Cybersecurity and Cloud Computing (CSCloud), 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference, IEEE, 382–89.
   Google Scholar
• Keith Naughton Humans Are Slamming into Driverless Cars and Exposing a Key Flaw. December 2015 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-18/humans-are-slamming-into-driverless-cars-and-exposing-a-key-flaw
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. 2016. New threats to vehicle safety: How cybersecurity policy will shape the future of autonomous vehicles. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 23:343.
   Google Scholar
• Koscher, K., A. Czeskis, F. Roesner, S. Patel, T. Kohno, S. Checkoway, … S. Savage. May 2010. Experimental security analysis of a modern automobile. Security and Privacy (SP), 2010 IEEE Symposium. IEEE, 447–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J., B. D. Taylor, and M. Garrett. 2016. A private matter: The implications of privacy regulations for intelligent transportation systems. Transportation Planning and Technology 39 (2):115–35. doi:10.1080/03081060.2015.1127537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M. 2015a. Active cyber defense cycle. viewed 6 February 2017, http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/bsideshuntsville2015/active-cyber-defense-cyclerobert-m-lee
   Google Scholar
• Mandt, E. J. 2017. Integrating cyber-intelligence analysis and active cyber-defence operations. Journal of Information Warfare 16 (1):31–48.
   Google Scholar
• McChristian, L., and R. Corbett. 2016. Regulatory issues related to autonomous vehicles. Journal of Insurance Regulation 35 (7).
   Google Scholar
• McMorrow, D. November 2010. Science of cybersecurity. Jason, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, Tech. Rep..
   Google Scholar
• Pallant., J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual. 3rd ed. Crows West, New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, S., P. Ward, K. Wilson, and J. Miller. 2017. Cyber threats facing autonomous and connected vehicles: Future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18 (11):2898–915. doi:10.1109/TITS.2017.2665968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, L., D. Tilbury, X. J. Yang, and L. Robert. 2017. Effects of augmented situational awareness on driver trust in semi-autonomous vehicle operation.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, J., and S. E. Shladover. 2015. Potential cyberattacks on automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16 (2):546–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakiz, F., and S. Sen. 2017. A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV. Ad Hoc Networks 61:33–50. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A., J. F. Bonnefon, and I. Rahwan. 2017. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour 1 (10):694. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simic, M. N. October 2013. Vehicular ad hoc networks. Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013 11th International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 613–18). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Surden, H., and M. A. Williams. 2016. Technological opacity, predictability, and self-driving cars. Cardozo Law Review 38:121.
   Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A., and H. S. M. Lim. 2018. Governing autonomous vehicles: Emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toews, R. August. 25, 2016. The biggest threat facing connected autonomous vehicles is cybersecurity. Techcrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/25/the-biggest-threatfacing-connected-autonomous-vehicles-is-cybersecurity/.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. W., and S. Uludag April, 2016. Intelligent transportation as the key enabler of smart cities. Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2016 IEEE/IFIP (pp. 1261–64). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Villasenor, J. April 2014. Products liability and driverless cars: issues and guiding principles for legislation. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/products-liability-and-driverless-cars-issues-and-guiding-principles-for-legislation/
   Google Scholar
• Volkswagen, Intel, and Mobileye will launch a self-driving taxi service in Israel. 2019. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/29/18039216/volkswagen-intel-mobileye-self-driving-ride-hailing-israel–2019
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Z. Lu, and G. Qu. 2018. An entropy analysis based intrusion detection system for controller area network in vehicles. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1808:04046.
   Google Scholar
• Werts, C. E., D. R. Rock, R. L. Linn, and K. G. Joreskog. 1978. A general method of estimating the reliability of a composite. Educational and Psychological Measurement 38 (4):933–38. doi:10.1177/001316447803800412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham, R. H., and A. Theodorou. 2017. Robot transparency, trust and utility. Connection Science 29 (3):242–48. doi:10.1080/09540091.2017.1313816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., and Y. Liu. 2007. Queuing network modeling of driver workload and performance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 8 (3):528–37. doi:10.1109/TITS.2007.903443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, C., W. Xu, and J. Liu. 2016. Can you trust autonomous vehicles: Contactless attacks against sensors of self-driving vehicle. DEF CON. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., and F. Y. Wang. November 2016. Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference (pp. 2663–68). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zeeb, K., A. Buchner, and M. Schrauf. 2015. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 78:212–21. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., H. Antunes, and S. Aggarwal. 2014. Defending connected vehicles against malware: Challenges and a solution framework. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1 (1):10–21. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2302386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar