An evaluation of machine learning techniques to predict the outcome of children treated for Hodgkin-Lymphoma on the AHOD0031 trial

References

• Beaulac, C., J. S. Rosenthal, and D. Hodgson. 2018. A deep latent-variable model application to select treatment intensity in survival analysis. Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) Workshop at NeurIPS 2018 2018. https://arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=report_num&query=ML4H/2018/53
   Google Scholar
• Bou-Hamad, I., D. Larocque, and H. Ben-Ameur. 2011, January. A review of survival trees. Statistics Surveys 5 :44–71. doi:10.1214/09-SS047.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24 (2):123–40. doi:10.1007/BF00058655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45 (1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., R. L. Kodell, K. F. Cheng, and J. J. Chen. 2012, July 23. Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12 (1):102. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christodoulou, E., J. Ma, G. S. Collins, E. W. Steyerberg, J. Y. Verbakel, and B. V. Calster. 2019. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 110:12–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34 (2):187–220. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2985181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. 1975, August. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62 (2):269–76. doi:10.1093/biomet/62.2.269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotso, S. 2018, January. Deep neural networks for survival analysis based on a multi-task framework. arXiv E-prints:arXiv:1801.05512.
   Google Scholar
• Fotso, S., et al. 2019. PySurvival: Open source package for survival analysis modeling. https://www.pysurvival.io/
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. L., L. Chen, S. Wolden, A. Buxton, K. McCarten, T. J. FitzGerald, and C. L. Schwartz. 2014. Dose-intensive response-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for children and adolescents with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk hodgkin lymphoma: A report from the children’s oncology group study ahod0031. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32 (32):3651–58. (PMID: 25311218). doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2010. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33 (1):1–22. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i01/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio, and A. Courville. 2016. Deep learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, E., C. Schmoor, W. Sauerbrei, and M. Schumacher. 1999. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 18 (September):2529–45. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/183.0.CO;2-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, H. 2019. MTLR: Survival prediction with multi-task logistic regression [Computer software manual]. (R package version 0.2.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MTLR.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. 2006, February. Classifier technology and the illusion of progress. Statistical Science 21 (1):1–14. doi:10.1214/088342306000000060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E., K. L. Lee, and D. B. Mark. 1996. Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 15 (4):361–87. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., B. Lausen, A. Benner, and M. Radespiel-Tröger. 2004. Bagging survival trees. Statistics in Medicine 23 (1):77–91. doi:10.1002/sim.1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., K. Hornik, and A. Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3):651–74. doi:10.1198/106186006X133933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., K. Hornik, C. Strobl, and A. Zeileis. 2019. Party: A laboratory for recursive partytioning [Computer software manual]. (R package version 1.3-3). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/party/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., P. Bühlmann, S. Dudoit, A. Molinaro, and M. J. Van Der Laan. 2005, December. Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 7 (3):355–73. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran, H., and U. Kogalur. 2019. Fast unified random forests for survival, regression, and classification (rf-src) [Computer software manual]. manual. (R package version 2.9.1). https://cran.r-project.org/package=randomForestSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ishwaran, H., and U. B. Kogalur. 2010. Consistency of random survival forests. Statistics & Probability Letters 80 (13):1056–64. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715210000672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran, H., U. B. Kogalur, E. H. Blackstone, and M. S. Lauer. 2008, September. Random survival forests. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2 (3):841–60. doi:10.1214/08-AOAS169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran, H., U. B. Kogalur, E. Z. Gorodeski, A. J. Minn, and M. S. Lauer. 2010. High-dimensional variable selection for survival data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (489):205–17. doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinga, B., T. Zhangh, Z. Wanga, Y. Jina, K. Liua, W. Qiua, … C. Lia. 2019. A deep survival analysis method based on ranking. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 98:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman, J. (2017). Deepsurv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a cox proportional hazards deep neural network. https://github.com/jaredleekatzman/DeepSurv
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, J., U. Shaham, A. Cloninger, J. Bates, T. Jiang, and Y. Kluger. 2018, December. Deepsurv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18 (1). doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingma, D. P. 2017. Variational inference & deep learning: A new synthesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Armsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma D.P. and Welling M. 2014.Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, M., and J. Crowley. 1995. A review of tree-based prognostic models. Recent Advances in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis 75:113–24.
   Google Scholar
• Leblanc, M. E., and J. P. Crowley. 1992. Relative risk trees for censored survival data. Biometrics 48 (2):411–25. doi:10.2307/2532300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., K. Gadepalli, M. Norouzi, G. E. Dahl, T. Kohlberger, A. Boyko, and M. C. Stumpe. 2017, March. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images. arXiv E-prints :arXiv:1703.02442.
   Google Scholar
• Louizos, C., U. Shalit, J. Mooij, D. Sontag, R. Zemel, and M. Welling. 2017, May. Causal effect inference with deep latent-variable models. . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 6446-6456).
   Google Scholar
• Luck, M., T. Sylvain, H. Cardinal, A. Lodi, and Y. Bengio. 2017. Deep learning for patient-specific kidney graft survival analysis. CoRR, abs/1705.10245. http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10245
   Google Scholar
• Nazabal,A., Olmos, P. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Valera. (2020). Handling incomplete heterogeneous data using vaes. Pattern Recognition, 107501.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, A., and T. Hothorn. 2019. ipred: Improved predictors [Computer software manual]. (R package version 0.9-9). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ipred.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ruiz, A., E. Krupinski, -J.-J. Mordang, K. Schilling, S. H. Heywang-Köbrunner, I. Sechopoulos, and R. M. Mann. 2019. Detection of breast cancer with mammography: Effect of an artificial intelligence support system. Radiology 290 (2):305–14. (PMID: 30457482). doi:10.1148/radiol.2018181371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ruiz, A., K. Lång, A. Gubern-Merida, M. Broeders, G. Gennaro, P. Clauser, and I. Sechopoulos. 2019, March. Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: Comparison with 101 radiologists. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 111 (9):916–22. doi:10.1093/jnci/djy222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidiropoulos, N., S. H. Sohi, N. Rapin, and F. O. Bagger (2017). sinaplot: An enhanced chart for simple and truthful representation of single observations over multiple classes. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sinaplot/vignettes/SinaPlot.html
   Google Scholar
• Simon, N., J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2011. Regularization paths for cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles 39 (5):1–13. doi:10.18637/jss.v039.i05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steck, H., Krishnapuram, B., Dehing-Oberije, C., Lambin, P., & Raykar, V. C. (2008). On ranking in survival analysis: Bounds on the concordance index. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1209–1216)
   Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., A.-L. Boulesteix, A. Zeileis, and T. Hothorn. 2007. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (1):25. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therneau, T., B. Atkinson, and B. Ripley (2017). rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees [Computer software manual]. (R package version 4.1-11). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum, G., and F. L. Drake Jr. 1995. Python tutorial. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C.-N., R. Greiner, H.-C. Lin, and V. Baracos. 2011. Learning patient-specific cancer survival distributions as a sequence of dependent regressors. In Advances in neural information processing systems 24, ed. J. Shawe Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, 1845–53. Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4210-learning-patient-specific-cancer-survival-distributions-as-a-sequence-of-dependent-regressors.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., and D. Feng. 2019, August. DNNSurv: Deep neural networks for survival analysis using pseudo values. arXiv E-prints :arXiv:1908.02337.
   Google Scholar