743
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Constraint Optimization–Based Sense and Response System for Interactive Business Performance Management

, , &
Pages 353-372 | Received 28 Nov 2019, Accepted 21 Oct 2020, Published online: 25 Feb 2021

References

  • Buckley S., Ettl M., Lin G., Wang KY.(2005) Sense and Respond Business Performance Management. In: An C., Fromm H. (eds) Supply Chain Management on Demand. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27354-9_12
  • Caballero, J. A., and I. E. Grossmann. 2014. Optimal synthesis of thermally coupled distillation sequences using a novel MILP approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering 61:118–35. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.10.015.
  • Deshmukh, A. K., and A. Mohan. March 2016. Demand chain management: The marketing and supply chain interface redefined. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management 13:20–36.
  • Dutta, A., H. Lee, and M. Yasai-Ardekani. 2014. Digital systems and competitive responsiveness: The dynamics of it business value. Information & Management 51 (6):762–73. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.005.
  • GLPK. 1989. The GLPK MILP Solver – GNU Project. http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk
  • Gottlob, G., G. Greco, and T. Mancini. Conditional constraint satisfaction: Logical foundations and complexity. In Proceedings of 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), Hyderabad, India, 88–93, 2007.
  • Gottschalk, K., S. Graham, H. Kreger, and J. Snell. 2002. Introduction to web services architecture. IBM Systems Journal 41:170–-177. doi:10.1147/sj.412.0170.
  • Haeckel, S., and A. J. Slywotzky. 1999. Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Hahn, G. J., and J. Packowski. 2015. A perspective on applications of in-memory analytics in supply chain management. Decision Support Systems 76 ( Analyzing the Impacts of Advanced Information Technologies on Business Operations):45–52. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.003.
  • Hayes, B. P., I. Melatti, T. Mancini, M. Prodanovic, and E. Tronci. 2017. Residential demand management using individualised demand aware price policies. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 8:3. doi:10.1109/TSG.2016.2596790.
  • Hazen, B. T., J. B. Skipper, J. D. Ezell, and C. A. Boone. November 2016. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Computers & Industrial Engineering 101 (C):592–98. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.030.
  • Heilporn, G., L. De Giovanni, and M. Labbé. 2008. Optimization models for the single delay management problem in public transportation. European Journal of Operational Research 189 (3):762–74. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.065.
  • Herzum, P., and O. Sims. 2000. Business components factory: A comprehensive overview of component-based development for the enterprise. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  • Huang, Y., S. Kumaran, and J.-Y. Chung. 2005. A model-driven framework for enterprise service management. Information Systems and e-Business Management 3 (2):201–17. doi:10.1007/s10257-005-0056-8.
  • Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (1):71–9. PMID: 10119714.
  • Kapoor, S., K. Bhattacharya, S. Buckley, P. Chowdhary, M. Ettl, K. Katircioglu, E. Mauch, and L. Phillips. 2005. A technical framework for sense-and-respond business management. IBM Systems Journal 44:5–24. doi:10.1147/sj.441.0005.
  • Kyriakidis, T. S., G. M. Kopanos, and M. C. Georgiadis. 2012. MILP formulations for single-and multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 36:369–85. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.06.007.
  • Lusch, R. F., Y. Liu, and Y. Chen. 2010. The phase transition of markets and organizations: The new intelligence and entrepreneurial frontier. IEEE Intelligent Systems 25 (1):71–75.
  • Lush, R. F. Jan 2011. Reframing supply chain management: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management 47 (1):14–18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03211.x.
  • Mancini, T. 2016. Now or Never: Negotiating efficiently with unknown or untrusted counterparts. Fundamenta Informaticae 149 (1–2):61–100. doi:10.3233/FI-2016-1443.
  • Mancini, T., E. Tronci, I. Salvo, F. Mari, A. Massini, and I. Melatti. Computing biological model parameters by parallel statistical model checking. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2015), volume 9044 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 542–54. Granada, Spain: Springer, 2015b.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, A. Massini, I. Melatti, and E. Tronci. Anytime system level verification via random exhaustive hardware in the loop simulation. In Proceedings of 17th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD 2014), Verona, Italy, 236–45. IEEE, 2014a.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, A. Massini, I. Melatti, and E. Tronci. 2016a. Anytime system level verification via parallel random exhaustive hardware in the loop simulation. Microprocessors and Microsystems 41:12–28. doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2015.10.010.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, A. Massini, I. Melatti, and E. Tronci. 2016b. SyLVaaS: System level formal verification as a service. Fundamenta Informaticae 1–2:101–32. doi:10.3233/FI-2016-1444.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, A. Massini, I. Melatti, I. Salvo, and E. Tronci. 2017. On minimising the maximum expected verification time. Information Processing Letters 122:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2017.02.001.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, A. Massini, I. Melatti, I. Salvo, S. Sinisi, E. Tronci, R. Ehrig, S. Röblitz, and B. Leeners. Computing personalised treatments through in silico clinical trials. A case study on downregulation in assisted reproduction. In Proceedings of 25th RCRA International Workshop on Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Solving Problems with Combinatorial Explosion (RCRA 2018), volume 2271 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Oxford, UK: CEUR.org, 2018a.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, I. Melatti, I. Salvo, and E. Tronci. An efficient algorithm for network vulnerability analysis under malicious attacks. In Proceedings of The 24th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2018). Limassol, Cyprus: Springer, 2018b.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, I. Melatti, I. Salvo, E. Tronci, J. Gruber, B. Hayes, M. Prodanovic, and L. Elmegaard. Demand-aware price policy synthesis and verification services for smart grids. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm 2014), 794–99. Venice, Italy: IEEE, 2014b.
  • Mancini, T., F. Mari, I. Melatti, I. Salvo, E. Tronci, J. K. Gruber, B. Hayes, M. Prodanovic, and L. Elmegaard. User flexibility aware price policy synthesis for smart grids. In Proceedings of 18th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD 2015), 478–85. Madeira, Portugal: IEEE, 2015a.
  • Mancini, T., M. Cadoli, D. Micaletto, and F. Patrizi. 2008. Evaluating ASP and commercial solvers on the CSPLib. Constraints 13 (4):407–36. doi:10.1007/s10601-007-9028-6.
  • Mancini, T., P. Flener, and J. Pearson. Combinatorial problem solving over relational databases: View synthesis through constraint-based local search. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2012), 80–87. Trento, Italy: ACM, 2012.
  • Mari, F., I. Melatti, I. Salvo, and E. Tronci. Synthesis of quantized feedback control software for discrete time linear hybrid systems. In Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV 2010), volume 6174 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 180–95. Edinburgh, UK: Springer, 2010.
  • Mari, F., I. Melatti, I. Salvo, and E. Tronci. 2014. Model based synthesis of control software from system level formal specifications. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 23 (1):1–42. doi:10.1145/2559934.
  • Negash, S., and P. Gray. 2008. Business intelligence. In Handbook on decision support systems 2. International handbooks information system, 175–193 Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9
  • Neumaier, A., O. Shcherbina, W. Huyer, and T. Vinkó. 2005. A comparison of complete global optimization solvers. Mathematical Programming 103 (2):335–56. doi:10.1007/s10107-005-0585-4.
  • Nguyen, T. M., J. Schiefer, and A. M. Tjoa. Sense & response service architecture (SARESA): An approach towards a real-time business intelligence solution and its use for a fraud detection application. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, DOLAP ‘05, 77–86, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
  • OMG Object Management Group. 0000. Model driven architecture. http://www.omg.org/mda/.
  • Sakellaropoulos, S., and A. P. Chassiakos. 2004. Project time–cost analysis under generalised precedence relations. Advances in Engineering Software 35 (10–11):715–24. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2004.03.017.
  • Seufert, A., and J. Schiefer. Enhanced business intelligence – Supporting business processes with real-time business analytics. In DEXA Workshops, 919–25. Copenhagen, Denmark: IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
  • Tronci, E., T. Mancini, I. Salvo, S. Sinisi, F. Mari, I. Melatti, A. Massini, F. Davi’, T. Dierkes, R. Ehrig, et al. Patient-specific models from inter-patient biological models and clinical records. In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD 2014), 207–14. Lausanne, Switzerland:IEEE, 2014.
  • Van den Bergh, J., P. De Bruecker, J. Beliën, L. De Boeck, and E. Demeulemeester. 2013. A three-stage approach for aircraft line maintenance personnel rostering using MIP, discrete event simulation and DEA. Expert Systems with Applications 40 (7):2659–68. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.11.009.
  • Vergidis, K., A. Tiwari, and B. Majeed. 2007. Business process analysis and optimization: Beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38 (1):69–82. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905812.
  • Wang, X., M. Brandt-Pearce, and S. Subramaniam. 2015. Impact of wavelength and modulation conversion on translucent elastic optical networks using MILP. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 7 (7):644–55. doi:10.1364/JOCN.7.000644.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.