A Collaborative Beetle Antennae Search Algorithm Using Memory Based Adaptive Learning

References

• Allmendinger, R., M. T. M. Emmerich, J. Hakanen, Y. Jin, and E. Rigoni. 2017. Surrogate‐assisted multicriteria optimization: Complexities, prospective solutions, and business case. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 24 (1–2):5–24. doi:10.1002/mcda.1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. M., and A. Routtenberg. 1967. “Reminiscence” in the Cold Flour Beetle (Tenebrio molitor). Science 158 (3804):1066–67. doi:10.1126/science.158.3804.1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Y., W. Lu, and W. Cheng. 2015. Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of Optimal Groundwater Exploitation Scheme Based on Regression Kriging Method—A Case Study of Western Jilin Province. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (8):8897–918. doi:10.3390/ijerph120808897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaiz-González, Á., A. Fernández-Valdivielso, A. Bustillo, L. Norberto, and L. De Lacalle. 2016. Using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dimensional error on inclined surfaces manufactured by ball-end milling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 83 (5–8):847–59. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7543-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augera, A., J. Bader, D. Brockhoff, and E. Zitzler. 2012. Hypervolume-based multiobjective optimization: Theoretical foundations and practical implications. Theoretical Computer Science 425:75–103. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2011.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh, A., M. Ravanbakhsh, M. Rezaei-Malek, M. Sheikhalishahi, and A. Taheri-Moghaddam. 2017. Unique NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms for improved dynamic cellular manufacturing systems considering human factors. Applied Mathematical Modelling 48:655–72. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., S. Saha, U. Maulik, and K. Deb. 2008. A Simulated Annealing-Based Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm: AMOSA. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 12 (3):269–83. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2007.900837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouraoui, A., S. Jamoussi, and Y. B. Ayed. 2018. A multi-objective genetic algorithm for simultaneous model and feature selection for support vector machines. Artificial Intelligent Review 50 (2):261–81. doi:10.1007/s10462-017-9543-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 1984. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Classification and Regression Trees, 368. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470
   Google Scholar
• Bringmann, K., and T. Friedrich. 2010. An Efficient Algorithm for Computing Hypervolume Contributions. Evolutionary Computation 18 (3):383–402. doi:10.1162/EVCO_a_00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, A. E. I., and J. A. Wright. 2015. Constrained, mixed-integer and multi-objective optimisation of building designs by NSGA-II with fitness approximation. Applied Soft Computing 33:114–26. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, O., and V. Vapnik. 2000. Model Selection for Support Vector Machines. NIPS’99 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Denver, CO: MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA. 230–36. http://olivier.chapelle.cc/pub/nips99.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, T., S. Chakraborty, and R. Chowdhury. 2019. A Critical Review of Surrogate Assisted Robust Design Optimization. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 26 (1):245–74. doi:10.1007/s11831-017-9240-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., K. Li, and X. Yao. 2018. Dynamic Multiobjectives Optimization With a Changing Number of Objectives. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 22 (1):157–71. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2017.2669638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh, T., Y. Jin, K. Miettinen, J. Hakanen, and K. Sindhya. 2018. A Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Many-Objective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 22 (1):129–42. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2016.2622301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello, C. A. C., and M. S. Lechuga. 2002. MOPSO: A proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC’02 (Cat. No.02TH8600). Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE. 1051–56. 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004388.
   Google Scholar
• Dahane, M., and L. Benyoucef. 2016. An Adapted NSGA-II Algorithm for a Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) Design Under Machines Reliability Constraints. In Metaheuristics for Production Systems, ed. E. G. Talbi, F. Yalaoui, and L. Amodeo, vol. 60, 109–30. Switzerland: Springer. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23350-5_5.
   Google Scholar
• Das, I., and J. E. Dennis. 1998. Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization 8 (3):631–57. doi:10.1137/S1052623496307510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, and T. Meyarivan. 2000. A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. PPSN. Berlin, Heidelberg: Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceed., M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J. J. Merelo, and H. P. Schwefel, 849–58. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 2000. 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., and H. Jain. 2014. An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 18 (4):577–601. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. 2001. Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) doi:10.3929/ethz-a-004284199.
   Google Scholar
• Delgarm, N., B. Sajadi, S. Delgarm, and F. Kowsary. 2016. A novel approach for the simulation-based optimization of the buildings energy consumption using NSGA-II: Case study in Iran. Energy and Buildings 127:552–60. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engine Timing Model with Closed Loop Control. 1994. https://se.mathworks.com/help/simulink/slref/engine-timing-model-with-closed-loop-control.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A. H., and A. H. Alavi. 2012. Krill herd: A new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Communications in Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation 17 (12):4831–45. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A. H., X. S. Yang, and A. H. Alavi. 2013. Cuckoo search algorithm: A metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Engineering with Computers 29 (1):17–35. doi:10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geethanjali, M., S. M. R. Slochanal, and R. Bhavani. 2008. PSO trained ANN-based differential protection scheme for power transformers. Neurocomputing 71 (4–6):4–6. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2007.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giunta, A., S. Wojtkiewicz, and M. Eldred. 2003. Overview of Modern Design of Experiments Methods for Computational Simulations. Reno, Nevada, USA.: 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings.
   Google Scholar
• Gröger, C., F. Niedermann, and B. Mitschang. 2012. Data Mining-driven Manufacturing Process Optimization. London, UK: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering. http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2012/WCE2012_pp1475-1481.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hacioglu, G., V. Faryad, A. Kand, and E. Sesli. 2016. Multi objective clustering for wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications 59:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftka, R. T., D. Villanuev, and A. Chaudhuri. 2016. Parallel surrogate-assisted global optimization with expensive functions – A survey. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 54 (1):3–13. doi:10.1007/s00158-016-1432-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, R. L. 1971. Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research 76 (8):1905/1915. doi:10.1029/JB076i008p01905.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., and S. Li. 2017. BAS: Beetle Antennae Search Algorithm for Optimization Problems. arXiv:1710.10724 [cs.NE]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.10724.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., H. Wang, T. Chugh, D. Guo, and K. Miettinen. 2018. Data-Driven Evolutionary Optimization: An Overview and Case Studies. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2869001.
   Google Scholar
• Kestelman, H. 1960. Lebesgue Measure. Chap. 3 in Modern Theories of Integration, 67–91. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, J., and H. Nakayama. 2008. Meta-Modeling in Multiobjective Optimization. In Multiobjective Optimization, ed. J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen, and R. Słowiński, vol. 5252, 245–84. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_10.
   Google Scholar
• Krempser, E., H. S. Bernardino, H. J. C. Barbosa, and A. C. C. Lemonge. 2017. Performance evaluation of local surrogate models in differential evolution-based optimum design of truss structures. Engineering Computations 34 (2):499–547. doi:10.1108/EC-06-2015-0176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Q. Xiao, Y. Tang, and L. Li. 2016. A method integrating Taguchi, RSM and MOPSO to CNC machining parameters optimization for energy saving. Journal of Cleaner Production 135 (1):263–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.097.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. C., and I. C. Yeh. 2017. Using mixture design and neural networks to build stock selection decision support systems. Neural Computing & Applications 28 (3):521–35. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-2090-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, R., S. Aggarwal, R. Girdhar, and R. Chugh. 2018. Bug localization in software using NSGA-II. 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE). Penang, Malaysia: IEEE. 10.1109/ISCAIE.2018.8405511.
   Google Scholar
• Messac, A. 2015. Optimization in Practice with MATLAB. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316271391.
   Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S. 2015. The Ant Lion Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software 83:80–98. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S., S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis. 2014. Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software 69:46–61. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkaouer, W., M. Kessentini, A. Shaout, P. Koligheu, S. Bechikh, K. Deb, and A. Ouni. 2015. Many-Objective Software Remodularization Using NSGA-III. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 17: 1–17: 45 24(3):. doi:10.1145/2729974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. N., and J. A. Sonquist. 1963. Problems in the Analysis of Survey Data, and a Proposal. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (302):415–34. doi:10.2307/2283276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, T., and H. Ishibuchi. 1995. MOGA: Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Perth, Australia. 289–94. http://www.academia.edu/download/43575182/MOGA_1995_Murata.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murugeswari, R., S. Radhakrishnan, and D. Devaraj. 2016. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based QoS routing in wireless mesh networks. Applied Soft Computing 40:517–25. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odili, J. B., M. N. M. Kahar, and S. Anwar. 2015. African Buffalo Optimization: A Swarm-Intelligence Technique. Procedia Computer Science 76:443–48. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.291.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, L., C. He, Y. Tian, H. Wang, X. Zhang, and Y. Jin. 2019. A Classification-Based Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Many-Objective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 23 (1):74–88. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2802784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilát, M., and R. Neruda. 2011. LAMM-MMA: Multiobjective memetic algorithm with local aggregate meta-model. GECCO ‘11 Proceedings of the 13th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. Dublin, Ireland. 10.1145/2001858.2001905.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J. R. 1992. Learning with continuous classes. 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Sydney, Australia. 343–48. https://sci2s.ugr.es/keel/pdf/algorithm/congreso/1992-Quinlan-AI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sadollah, A., A. Bahreininejad, H. Eskandar, and M. Hamdi. 2013. Mine blast algorithm: A new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing 13 (5):2592–612. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, S., and G. G. Wang. 2010. Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 41 (2):219–41. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0420-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T., V. Toropov, V. Balabanov, and F. Viana. 2008. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Review of How Far We Have Come - Or Not. British Columbia: 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C., Y. Jin, R. Cheng, J. Ding, and J. Zeng. 2017. Surrogate-Assisted Cooperative Swarm Optimization of High-Dimensional Expensive Problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 21 (4):644–60. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2017.2675628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., Y. Jin, J. Zeng, and Y. Yu. 2015. A two-layer surrogate-assisted particle swarm optimization algorithm. Soft Computing 19 (6):1461–75. doi:10.1007/s00500-014-1283-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenne, Y., and S. W. Armfield. 2009. A framework for memetic optimization using variable global and local surrogate models. Soft Computing 13 (8–9):781–92. doi:10.1007/s00500-008-0348-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsanasa, A., and A. Xifara. 2012. Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools. Energy and Buildings 49:560–67. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veillegas, J. G. 2011. use nonparametric tests to compare the performance of metaheuristic. http://or-labsticc.univ-ubs.fr/sites/default/files/Friedman%20test%20-24062011_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Y. Jin, and J. O. Jansen. 2016. Data-Driven Surrogate-Assisted Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization of a Trauma System. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 20 (6):939–52. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2016.2555315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Y. Jin, C. Sun, and J. Doherty. 2018. Offline Data-Driven Evolutionary Optimization Using Selective Surrogate Ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2018.2834881.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and H. Chen. 2018. BSAS: Beetle Swarm Antennae Search Algorithm for Optimization Problems. arXiv:1807.10470 [cs.NE]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.10470.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., L. Yang, and Q. Liu. 2018. Beetle Swarm Optimization Algorithm: Theory and Application. arXiv:1808.00206 [cs.NE]. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1808/1808.00206.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., D. Q. Yin, S. Yang, and G. Sun. 2019. Global and Local Surrogate-Assisted Differential Evolution for Expensive Constrained Optimization Problems With Inequality Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 49 (5):1642–56. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2018.2809430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. H., and W. G. Macready. 1997. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1 (1):67–82. doi:10.1109/4235.585893.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, H. J., M. Egas, and X. K. Yang. 2007. Development of a positive preference–performance relationship in an oligophagous beetle: Adaptive learning? Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 125 (2):119–24. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00605.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. S., S. Deb, and S. Fong. 2011. Accelerated Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Business Optimization and Applications. In Networked Digital Technologies, ed. S. Fong, vol. 136, 53–66. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22185-9_6.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, I. C. 2007. Modeling slump flow of concrete using second-order regressions and artificial neural networks. Cement & Concrete Composites 29 (6):474–80. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Y. Tan, J. Zeng, C. Sun, and Y. Jin. 2018. Surrogate-assisted hierarchical particle swarm optimization. Information Sciences 454-455:59–72. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., and H. Li. 2007. MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 11 (6):712–31. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., Y. S. Ong, P. B. Nair A. J. K, and K. Y. Lum. 2007. Combining Global and Local Surrogate Models to Accelerate Evolutionary Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37 (1):66–76. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2005.855506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., Z. Zhang, W. Man, X. Tong, J. Qiu, and F. Li. 2018. A new beetle antennae search algorithm for multi-objective energy management in microgrid. 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). Wuhan, China. 1599–603. 10.1109/ICIEA.2018.8397965.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., K. Deb, and L. Thiele. 2000. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation 8 (2):173–95. doi:10.1162/106365600568202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar