Systematic Review of Computing Approaches for Breast Cancer Detection Based Computer Aided Diagnosis Using Mammogram Images

References

• Agnes, A., J. Anitha, S. I. A. Pandian, and J. D. Peter, et al. 2020. Classification of mammogram images using multiscale all convolutional neural network (MA-CNN). Journal of medical systems 44 (1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1494-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, L., M. M. Iqbal, H. Aldabbas, S. Khalid, Y. Saleem, and S. Saeed, et al. 2020. Images data practices for semantic segmentation of breast cancer using deep neural network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01680-1
   Google Scholar
• Al-Antari, M. A., M. A. Al-Masni, M.-T. Choi, S.-M. Han, and T.-S. Kim, et al. 2018. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification. International journal of medical informatics 117:44–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Antari, M. A., S.-M. Han, and T.-S. Kim. 2020. Evaluation of deep learning detection and classification towards computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in digital X-ray mammograms. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 196:105584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSalman, H., and N. Almutairi. 2019. IDSS: An Intelligent Decision Support System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security, 1–6, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
   Google Scholar
• Arafa, E.-S. A., A. H. Asad, and H. A. Hefny. 2019. Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer CADx System in the Mammography. In 2019 15th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), 210–15, Giza , Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, D. S., R. Vig, and M. Hanmandlu. 2019. Mammogram image enhancement using entropy and CLAHE based intuitionistic fuzzy method. In 2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, India, 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, R., P. K. Rai, and B. Raman. 2020. Deep feature–based automatic classification of mammograms. Medical & biological engineering & computing, 58(6):1199-1211.
   Google Scholar
• Asri, H., H. Mousannif, H. Al Moatassime, and T. Noel, et al. 2016. Using machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk prediction and diagnosis. Procedia Computer Science 83:1064–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.224.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, H. W., S. Saeed, S. Rathore, and M. Rafique, et al. 2018. Automated breast cancer detection using machine learning techniques by extracting different feature extracting strategies. In 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), New York, NY, USA, 327–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bagchi, S., K. G. Tay, A. Huong, and S. K. Debnath, et al. 2020. Image processing and machine learning techniques used in computer-aided detection system for mammogram screening-A review. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 10 (3):2336.
   Google Scholar
• Berbar, M. A. 2018. Hybrid methods for feature extraction for breast masses classification. Egyptian informatics journal 19 (1):63–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudraa, S., A. Melouah, and H. F. Merouani. 2020. Improving mass discrimination in mammogram-CAD system using texture information and super-resolution reconstruction. Evolving Systems 11 (4):697–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-019-09322-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumaraf, S., X. Liu, C. Ferkous, and X. Ma, et al. 2020. A new computer-aided diagnosis system with modified genetic feature selection for bi-RADS classification of breast masses in mammograms. BioMed Research International 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7695207.
   Google Scholar
• Chaieb, R., and K. Kalti. 2019. Feature subset selection for classification of malignant and benign breast masses in digital mammography. Pattern Analysis and Applications 22 (3):803–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-018-0760-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charan, S., M. J. Khan, and K. Khurshid. 2018. Breast cancer detection in mammograms using convolutional neural network. In 2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. C., S. Wang, and P. Chen. 2020. A Novel Multi-Scale Adversarial Networks for Precise Segmentation of X-Ray Breast Mass. IEEE Access, 8, 103772–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., A. Zargari, A. B. Hollingsworth, H. Liu, B. Zheng, and Y. Qiu, et al. 2019. Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 179:104995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.104995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Y. Gao, L. Xie, X. Xie, and W. Lin, et al. 2020. Spatial Enhanced Rotation Aware Network for Breast Mass Segmentation in Digital Mammogram. IEEE Access. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978009
   Google Scholar
• Dallali, A., A. Slimen, S. El Khediri, and Y. Khemili, et al. 2018. Detection of lesion in mammograms. In 2018 International Conference on Advanced Systems and Electric Technologies (IC_ASET), Hammamet. Tunisia, 479–83.
   Google Scholar
• Das, P., and A. Das. 2019. A fast and automated segmentation method for detection of masses using folded kernel based fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 85:105775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, M. R., and B. Majhi. 2020. Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms: A moth flame optimization based ELM approach. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 59:101912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esener, İ. I., S. Ergin, and T. Yüksel. 2018. A novel multistage system for the detection and removal of pectoral muscles in mammograms. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 26 (1):35–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1703-272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhan, A. H., and M. Y. Kamil. 2020. Texture Analysis of Breast Cancer via LBP, HOG, and GLCM techniques. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 928, 072098. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/928/7/072098
   Google Scholar
• Gao. 2018. SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 70: 53–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardezi, S. J. S., A. Elazab, B. Lei, and T. Wang, et al. 2019. Breast cancer detection and diagnosis using mammographic data: Systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research 21 (7):e14464. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/14464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M. J., and D. A. S. Dhas. 2017. Preprocessing filters for mammogram images: a review. In 2017 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS), Mallasamudram, India, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Geweid, G. G., and M. A. Abdallah. 2019. A novel approach for breast cancer investigation and recognition using M-level set-based optimization functions. IEEE Access, 7, 136343–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghout, Y., Y. Tlili, and L. Souici. 2019. Classification of breast mass in mammography using anisotropic diffusion filter by selecting and aggregating morphological and textural features. Evolving Systems 12, 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X., Z. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Qi, Y. Guo, and Y. Ma, et al. 2019. Breast density analysis based on glandular tissue segmentation and mixed feature extraction. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (22):31185–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07917-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo, N., E. Montseny, and P. Sobrevilla. 2013. State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging 31 (8):1426–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, S. C., J. Wang, and F.-Y. Wang. 2019. Simultaneous segmentation and classification of mass region from mammograms using a mixed-supervision guided deep model. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 27, 196–200.
   Google Scholar
• Goudarzi, M., and K. Maghooli. 2018. Extraction of fuzzy rules at different concept levels related to image features of mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 38 (4):1004–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, S., Y. Chen, F. Sheng, T. Zhan, and Y. Chen, et al. 2019. A novel method for breast mass segmentation: from superpixel to subpixel segmentation. Machine Vision and Applications 30 (7–8):1111–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-019-01020-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, D., and R. Anand. 2017. A hybrid edge-based segmentation approach for ultrasound medical images. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 31:116–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagos, Y. B., A. G. Mérida, and J. Teuwen. 2018. Improving breast cancer detection using symmetry information with deep learning. In Danail Stoyanov et al. Image Analysis for Moving Organ, Breast, and Thoracic Images, 90–97. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Han, F. 2015. Texture feature analysis for computer-aided diagnosis on pulmonary nodules. Journal of digital imaging 28 (1):99–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9718-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazarika, M., and L. B. Mahanta. 2018. A novel region growing based method to remove pectoral muscle from MLO mammogram images. In Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computing, 307–16. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• He, K., G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girschik, et al. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 2961–69. 22–29 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, J., M. A. Burhanuddin, M. A. Mohammed, M. Elhoseny, and B. Garcia-Zapirain, et al. 2021. Fully automatic segmentation of gynaecological abnormality using a new viola–jones model. Computers, Materials & Continua 66 (3):3161–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.012691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indra, M. M. 2020. Multilevel Tetrolet transform based breast cancer classifier and diagnosis system for healthcare applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12, 3969–3978.
   Google Scholar
• Irfan, R., A. A. Almazroi, H. T. Rauf, R. Damaševičius, E. A. Nasr, and A. E. Abdelgawad, et al. 2021. Dilated semantic segmentation for breast ultrasonic lesion detection using parallel feature fusion. Diagnostics 11 (7). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071212.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, Z., X. Gao, Y. Wang, and J. Li, et al. 2018. A parasitic metric learning net for breast mass classification based on mammography. Pattern Recognition 75:292–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Gaona, Y., M. J. Rodríguez-Álvarez, and V. Lakshminarayanan. 2020. Deep-Learning-Based Computer-Aided Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging: A Critical Review. Applied Sciences 10 (22):8298. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228298.
   Google Scholar
• Jung. 2018. Detection of masses in mammograms using a one-stage object detector based on a deep convolutional neural network. PloS one 13(9):e0203355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior, G. B., S. V. Da Rocha, J. D. de Almeida, A. C. de Paiva, A. C. Silva, and M. Gattass, et al. 2019. Breast cancer detection in mammography using spatial diversity, geostatistics, and concave geometry. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (10):13005–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6259-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadry, S., R. Damasevicius, D. Taniar, V. Rajinikanth, and I. A. Lawal, et al. 2021. Extraction of tumour in breast MRI using joint thresholding and segmentation - A study. 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Bio Signals, Images and Instrumentation, ICBSII 2021, Chennai, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBSII51839.2021.9445152.
   Google Scholar
• Karthiga, R., K. Narasimhan, and G. Usha. 2019. Breast Cancer Diagnosis using Curvelet and Regional Features. In 2019 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) Coimbatore, India, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, P., G. Singh, and P. Kaur. 2019. Intellectual detection and validation of automated mammogram breast cancer images by multi-class SVM using deep learning classification. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 16:100151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, H. N., A. R. Shahid, B. Raza, A. H. Dar, and H. Alquhayz, et al. 2019. Multi-view feature fusion based four views model for mammogram classification using convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 7, 165724–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kim-Soon, N., A. I. Abdulmaged, and S. A. Mostafa. 2021. A framework for analyzing the relationships between cancer patient satisfaction, nurse care, patient attitude, and nurse attitude in healthcare systems. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02888-x.
   Google Scholar
• Kou, G., P. Yang, Y. Peng, F. Xiao, Y. Chen, and F. E. Alsaadi, et al. 2020. Evaluation of feature selection methods for text classification with small datasets using multiple criteria decision-making methods. Applied Soft Computing 86:105836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahoura, V., H. Singh, A. Aggarwal, B. Sharma, M. A. Mohammed, R. Damaševičius, S. Kadry, and K. Cengiz, et al. 2021. Cloud Computing-Based Framework for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Extreme Learning Machine. Diagnostics 11 (2):241. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521 (7553):436–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., R. Mukundan, and S. Boyd. 2021. Novel Texture Feature Descriptors Based on Multi-Fractal Analysis and LBP for Classifying Breast Density in Mammograms. Journal of Imaging 7 (10):205. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., S. Zhuang, D.-A. Li, J. Zhao, and Y. Ma, et al. 2019. Benign and malignant classification of mammogram images based on deep learning. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 51:347–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. M., J. Wang, F. Wu, T. Liu, and Y. Pan, et al. 2014. A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods. Tsinghua science and technology 19 (6):578–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TST.2014.6961028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., M. Dong, G. Du, and X. Mu, et al. 2019. Attention dense-u-net for automatic breast mass segmentation in digital mammogram. IEEE Access, 7, 59037–47.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., L. Zhang, H. Chen, and L. Cheng, et al. 2020. Mass detection in mammograms by bilateral analysis using convolution neural network. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 195:105518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G., A. Milan, C. Shen, and I. Reid, et al. Refinenet: Multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1925–34. 21–26 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Z. Liu, S. Yong, K. Jia, and N. Razmjooy, et al. 2020. Computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis based on image segmentation and interval analysis. Automatika 61 (3):496–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2020.1785784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Song, S. Liu, and Y. Zhang, et al. 2021. A review of deep-learning-based medical image segmentation methods. Sustainability 13 (3):1224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., T. Zhu, L. Zhai, and J. Liu, et al. 2019. Mass classification of benign and malignant with a new twin support vector machine joint {l_ {2, 1}}-norm. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 10 (1):155–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0706-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizidou, K., G. Skouroumouni, C. Nikolaou, and C. Pitris, et al. 2020. An automated breast micro-calcification detection and classification technique using temporal subtraction of mammograms. IEEE Access, 8, 52785–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mabrouk, M. S., H. M. Afify, and S. Y. Marzouk. 2019. Fully automated computer-aided diagnosis system for micro calcifications cancer based on improved mammographic image techniques. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 10 (3):517–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massafra, R., S. Bove, V. Lorusso, A. Biafora, M. C. Comes, V. Didonna, and D. La Forgia, et al. 2021. Radiomic Feature Reduction Approach to Predict Breast Cancer by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images. Diagnostics 11 (4):684. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, E. F. 2019. Diagnosis of breast tissue in mammography images based local feature descriptors. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (10):12961–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6390-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melekoodappattu, J. G., and P. S. Subbian. 2019. A hybridized ELM for automatic micro calcification detection in mammogram images based on multi-scale features. Journal of medical systems 43 (7):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1316-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. R., E. Wang, J. Hu, J. Egger, and X. Chen, et al. 2020. A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants. Expert review of medical devices 17 (4):345–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2020.1736040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, A. A., W. A. Berg, H. Peng, Y. Luo, R. C. Jankowitz, and S. Wu, et al. 2018. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories. Medical physics 45 (1):314–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, B. A., and N. M. Salem. 2018. Automatic classification of masses from digital mammograms. In 2018 35th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC), Cairo, Egypt, 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M. A., B. Al-Khateeb, A. N. Rashid, D. A. Ibrahim, M. K. Abd Ghani, and S. A. Mostafa, et al. 2018. Neural network and multi-fractal dimension features for breast cancer classification from ultrasound images. Computers & Electrical Engineering 70:871–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, A. K., M. R. Senapati, and S. K. Lenka. 2013. An improved data mining technique for classification and detection of breast cancer from mammograms. Neural computing & applications 22 (S1):303–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0834-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, F., S. Rup, B. Dash, B. Majhi, and M. Swamy, et al. 2019a. A computer-aided diagnosis system using Tchebichef features and improved grey wolf optimized extreme learning machine. Applied Intelligence 49 (3):983–1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1294-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, F., S. Rup, B. Dash, B. Majhi, and M. Swamy, et al. 2019b. Digital mammogram classification using 2D-BDWT and GLCM features with FOA-based feature selection approach. Neural computing & applications 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04095-y.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, F., S. Rup, B. Dash, B. Majhi, and M. Swamy, et al. 2019c. Mammogram classification using contourlet features with forest optimization-based feature selection approach. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (10):12805–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5804-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughal, A., N. Muhammad, and M. Sharif. 2019. Adaptive hysteresis thresholding segmentation technique for localizing the breast masses in the curve stitching domain. International journal of medical informatics 126:26–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, M. N., M. Sharif, A. Rehman, and T. Saba, et al. 2018. Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette. BMC cancer 18 (1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murtaza, G. 2019. Deep learning-based breast cancer classification through medical imaging modalities: state of the art and research challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review 53, 1655–1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, D. R., R. Dash, B. Majhi, R. B. Pachori, and Y. Zhang, et al. 2020. A deep stacked random vector functional link network autoencoder for diagnosis of brain abnormalities and breast cancer. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 58:101860. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaid, O. I., M. A. Mohammed, M. K. A. Ghani, A. Mostafa, and F. Taha, et al. 2018. Evaluating the performance of machine learning techniques in the classification of Wisconsin Breast Cancer. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7 (4.36):160–66.
   Google Scholar
• Oza, P., P. Sharma, and S. Patel 2021. Machine Learning Applications for Computer-Aided Medical Diagnostics. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security, Ghaziabad, India, Singapore: Springer, 377–92. 3–4 October.
   Google Scholar
• Oza, P., P. Sharma, S. Patel, and A. Bruno, et al. 2021. A Bottom-Up Review of Image Analysis Methods for Suspicious Region Detection in Mammograms. Journal of Imaging 7 (9):190. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7090190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashoutan, S., S. B. Shokouhi, and M. Pashoutan. 2017. Automatic breast tumor classification using a level set method and feature extraction in mammography. In 2017 24th National and 2nd International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), Tehran, Iran, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, D. D., and S. G. Deore. 2013. Medical image segmentation: a review. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing 2 (1):22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, R. S., and N. Biradar. 2020. Automated mammogram breast cancer detection using the optimized combination of convolutional and recurrent neural network. Evolutionary Intelligence 14, 1459–1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavan, A. L., A. Vacavant, A. F. Alves, A. P. Trindade, and D. R. de Pina, et al. 2019. Automatic identification and extraction of pectoral muscle in digital mammography. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018, Springer, Prague, Czech Republic, 151–54.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J., C. Bao, C. Hu, X. Wang, W. Jian, and W. Liu, et al. 2020. Automated mammographic mass detection using deformable convolution and multiscale features. Medical & biological engineering & computing 58 (7):1405–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02170-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai, R., P. Oza, and P. Sharma 2020. Review of machine learning techniques in health care. In Proceedings of the ICRIC 2019, Jammu, India, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 103–11. 8–9 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Prathibha, G., and B. C. Mohan. 2018. Mammograms Classification Using Multiresolution Transforms and Convolution Neural Networks. In 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Bengaluru, India, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Preet, S. B. 2016. Classification of mammogram images by using CNN classifier. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Jaipur, India, 2743–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rabidas, R., and W. Arif. 2020. Characterization of mammographic masses based on local photometric attributes. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79 (29–30):21967–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08959-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimeto, S., T. G. Debelee, D. Yohannes, and F. Schwenker, et al. 2019. Automatic pectoral muscle removal in mammograms. Evolving Systems 12, 519–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmatika, A., A. Handayani, and A. W. Setiawan. 2019. Automated Segmentation of Breast Tissue and Pectoral Muscle in Digital Mammography. In 2019 International Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology (ICAIIT), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 397–401.
   Google Scholar
• Rajinikanth, V., S. Kadry, D. Taniar, R. Damasevicius, and H. T. Rauf, et al. 2021. Breast-cancer detection using thermal images with marine-predators-algorithm selected features. 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Bio Signals, Images and Instrumentation, ICBSII 2021, Chennai, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBSII51839.2021.9445166.
   Google Scholar
• Rampun, A. 2019. Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network. Medical image analysis 57:1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampun, A., P. J. Morrow, B. W. Scotney, and H. Wang, et al. 2020. Breast density classification in mammograms: An investigation of encoding techniques in binary-based local patterns. Computers in Biology and Medicine 122:103842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastgarpour, P. M., A. Sharifi, and S. Yazdani. 2019. Extraction of spiculated parts of mammogram tumors to improve accuracy of classification. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (14):19979–20003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7185-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routray, N. P. R. 2018. Textural feature based classification of mammogram images using ANN. In 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, Bengaluru, India, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rup, M. S., B. Dash, B. Majhi, and M. Swamy. 2020. An improved scheme for digital mammogram classification using weighted chaotic salp swarm algorithm-based kernel extreme learning machine. Applied Soft Computing 91:106266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadad, T., A. Munir, T. Saba, and A. Hussain, et al. 2018. Fuzzy C-means and region growing based classification of tumor from mammograms using hybrid texture feature. Journal of computational science 29:34–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2018.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoughi, F., Z. Kazemy, F. Hamedan, L. Owji, M. Rahmanikatigari, and T. T. Azadboni, et al. 2018. Artificial intelligence methods for the diagnosis of breast cancer by image processing: A review. Breast Cancer Targets Ther 10:219. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S175311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffari, N., H. A. Rashwan, M. Abdel-Nasser, V. Kumar Singh, M. Arenas, E. Mangina, and D. Puig, et al. 2020. Fully Automated Breast Density Segmentation and Classification Using Deep Learning. Diagnostics 10 (11):988. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajeev, S., M. Bajger, and G. Lee. 2018. Superpixel texture analysis for classification of breast masses in dense background. IET Computer Vision 12 (6):779–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cvi.2017.0586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, M. S., A. S. Eltrass, and H. M. Elkamchouchi. 2018. An improved approach for computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digital mammography. In 2018 IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA), Rome, Italy, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Saleck, M., A. ElMoutaouakkil, and M. Mouçouf. 2017. Tumor detection in mammography images using fuzzy C-means and GLCM texture features. In 2017 14th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, Marrakesh, Morocco, 122–25.
   Google Scholar
• Samant, N., and P. Sonar. 2018. Mammogram classification in transform domain. In 2018 5th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, India, 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sapate, S. G., A. Mahajan, S. N. Talbar, N. Sable, S. Desai, and M. Thakur, et al. 2018. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 163:1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.05.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, S., and M. Gyanchandani. 2020. Machine learning methods for computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis using histopathology: a narrative review. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences 51 (1):182–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2019.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechopoulos, I., J. Teuwen, and R. Mann. 2020. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art. Semin Cancer Biol 72:214-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and R. Mehra. 2020. Conventional machine learning and deep learning approach for multi-classification of breast cancer histopathology images—a comparative insight. Journal of digital imaging 33 (3):632–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00307-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shastri, A. A., D. Tamrakar, and K. Ahuja. 2018. Density-wise two stage mammogram classification using texture exploiting descriptors. Expert Systems with Applications 99:71–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayma’a, A. H., M. S. Sayed, M. I. Abdalla, and M. A. Rashwan, et al. 2019. Detection of breast cancer mass using MSER detector and features matching. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (14):20239–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7358-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., M. He, N. Shen, N. Yousefi, C. Wang, and G. Liu, et al. 2020. Optimal breast tumor diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform and deep belief network based on improved sunflower optimization method. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 60:101953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, R., K. Yan, F. Xiao, J. Chang, C. Jiang, and K. Zhou, et al. 2018. Automatic pectoral muscle region segmentation in mammograms using genetic algorithm and morphological selection. Journal of digital imaging 31 (5):680–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0068-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinde, V., and B. T. Rao. 2019. Novel approach to segment the pectoral muscle in the mammograms. In Cognitive Informatics and Soft Computing, 227–37. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shoaib, N. M., and S. Gattoufi. 2018. Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in Digital Mammograms via Linear Support Vector Machine. In 4th Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering (MECBME), Tunis, Tunisia, 141–46.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, X., L. Zhang, Z. Wang, Q. Lv, and Z. Yi, et al. 2020. Deep neural networks with region-based pooling structures for mammographic image classification. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 39, 2246–55. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, C. P. 2020. A Novel Approach for Mammogram Enhancement using Nonlinear Unsharp Masking and L0 Gradient Minimization. Procedia Computer Science 171:1848–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.198.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., R. Singh, and A. Bhatia. 2018. Sentiment analysis using Machine Learning technique to predict outbreaks and epidemics. Int J Adv Sci Res 3 (2):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V. K. 2018. Conditional generative adversarial and convolutional networks for X-ray breast mass segmentation and shape classification. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer,Granada, Spain, 833–40.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V. P., and R. Srivastava. 2018. Automated and effective content-based mammogram retrieval using wavelet based CS-LBP feature and self-organizing map. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 38 (1):90–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2017.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani, O. V. 2020. Michailovich, On Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle in Digital Mammograms by Means of Deep Learning. IEEE Access, 8, 204173–82.
   Google Scholar
• Song, R., T. Li, and Y. Wang. 2020. Mammographic Classification Based on XGBoost and DCNN With Multi Features. IEEE Access, 8, 75011–21.
   Google Scholar
• Soulami, K. B., M. N. Saidi, B. Honnit, C. Anibou, and A. Tamtaoui, et al. 2019. Detection of breast abnormalities in digital mammograms using the electromagnetism-like algorithm. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (10):12835–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5934-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganthi, S. J., V. G., M. Parvathy, and C. D. Devi, et al. 2020. Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammograms. Biomed Pharmacol 13 (3):1357–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., J. Wang, Z. Hu, Y. Xu, and Z. Cui, et al. 2019. Multi-view convolutional neural networks for mammographic image classification. IEEE Access, 7, 126273–82.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh, R., A. N. Rao, and B. E. Reddy. 2018. Improving the mammogram images by intelligibility mammogram enhancement method. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), Coimbatore, India, 1011–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq, N., B. Abid, K. A. Qadeer, I. Hashim, Z. Ali, and I. Khosa, et al. 2019. Breast cancer classification using global discriminate features in mammographic images. Breast Cancer 10:2.
   Google Scholar
• Tatikonda, K. C., C. M. Bhuma, and S. K. Samayamantula. 2018. The analysis of digital mammograms using HOG and GLCM features. In 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Bengaluru, India, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, N., M. Karimi, A. Norouzi, N. Karimi, S. Samavi, and S. R. Soroushmehr, et al. 2019. Detection of abnormalities in mammograms using deep features. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01639-x
   Google Scholar
• Teuwen, J., S. van de Leemput, A. Gubern-Mérida, A. Rodriguez-Ruiz, R. Mann, and B. E. Bejnordi, et al. 2018. Soft tissue lesion detection in mammography using deep neural networks for object detection. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning; MIDL'18; July 4-6, 2018; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2018. pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thanh, D. N., N. N. Hien, V. S. Prasath, and N. H. Hai, et al. 2020. Automatic initial boundary generation methods based on edge detectors for the level set function of the Chan-Vese segmentation model and applications in biomedical image processing. In Satapathy S., Bhateja V., Nguyen B., Nguyen N., Le DN. (eds) Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9920-6_18,
   Google Scholar
• Ting, F. F., Y. J. Tan, and K. S. Sim. 2019. Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. Expert Systems with Applications 120:103–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toz, P. E. 2018. A single sided edge marking method for detecting pectoral muscle in digital mammograms, Engineering. Technology and Applied Science Research 8 (1):2367–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triyani, Y., H. A. Nugroho, M. Rahmawaty, I. Ardiyanto, and L. Choridah, et al. 2016. Performance analysis of image segmentation for breast ultrasound images. In 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Uthoff, J. C. S. 2018. Information theory optimization based feature selection in breast mammography lesion classification. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA, 817–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vikhe, P., and V. Thool. 2018. Morphological operation and scaled réyni entropy based approach for masses detection in mammograms. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77 (18):23777–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5681-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. et al.,. 2018. Breast mass classification via deeply integrating the contextual information from multi-view data. Pattern Recognition 80: 42–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. et al.,. 2019a. Multi-level nested pyramid network for mass segmentation in mammograms. Neurocomputing 363: 313–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.06.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2019b. Breast cancer detection using extreme learning machine based on feature fusion with CNN deep features. IEEE Access, 7, 105146–58.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, P., C. Shu, and R. Goubran. 2018. Abnormality detection in mammography using deep convolutional neural networks. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Rome, Italy, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., C. Li, Y. Zhou, L. Mou, H. Zheng, and S. Wang, et al. 2018. Classifying mammographic breast density by residual learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10241.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, S. S., and S. M. Jadhav. 2020. Thermal infrared imaging based breast cancer diagnosis using machine learning techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09600-3
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y. S., C. Song, and B. Zheng. 2019. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 14 (2):237–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1867-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaşar, H., U. Kutbay, and F. Hardalaç. 2018. A new combined system using ANN and complex wavelet transform for tissue density classification in mammography images. In 2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications (ICCTA), Istanbul, Turkey,179–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi M., Krzyżak A., and Suen C. Y. 2018. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neu-ral networks and multiple instance learning. Computers in biology and medicine, 96, 283–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., L. Liu, Z. Wang, G. Dai, and Y. Xie. 2019. Transferring deep neural networks for the differentiation of mammographic breast lesions, Science China. Technological Sciences 62 (3):441–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9317-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., N. Zeng, S. Liu, and Y.-D. Zhang. 2019. Utilization of DenseNet201 for diagnosis of breast abnormality. Machine Vision and Applications 30 (7–8):1135–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-019-01042-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebari, A., H. Haron, S. R. Zeebaree, and D. Q. Zeebaree, et al. 2019. Enhance the Mammogram Images for Both Segmentation and Feature Extraction Using Wavelet Transform. In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE), Duhok, Iraq, 100–05.
   Google Scholar
• Zebari, D. A., D. Q. Zeebaree, A. M. Abdulazeez, H. Haron, and H. N. A. Hamed, et al. 2020. Improved Threshold Based and Trainable Fully Automated Segmentation for Breast Cancer Boundary and Pectoral Muscle in Mammogram Images. IEEE Access, 8, 203097–116.
   Google Scholar
• Zeebaree, D. Q., H. Haron, A. M. Abdulazeez, and D. A. Zebari, et al. 2019a. Machine learning and region growing for breast cancer segmentation. In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE), Duhok, Iraq, 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Zeebaree, D. Q., H. Haron, A. M. Abdulazeez, and D. A. Zebari, et al. 2019b. Trainable model based on new uniform LBP feature to identify the risk of the breast cancer. In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE), Duhok, Kurdistan region, Iraq, 106–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zeiser, F. A. 2020. Segmentation of Masses on Mammograms Using Data Augmentation and Deep Learning. Journal of digital imaging 33(4): 858–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., and Z. Wang. 2019. A microcalcification cluster detection method based on deep learning and multi-scale feature fusion. The Journal of Supercomputing 75 (9):5808–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02867-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.-D., S. C. Satapathy, D. S. Guttery, J. M. Górriz, and S.-H. Wang, et al. 2021. Improved Breast Cancer Classification Through Combining Graph Convolutional Network and Convolutional Neural Network. Information Processing & Management 58 (2):102439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang. 2020. DE-Ada*: A novel model for breast mass classification using cross-modal pathological semantic mining and organic integration of multi-feature fusions. Information Sciences 539: 461–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X. 2020. Deep learning radiomics can predict axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer. Nature communications 11 (1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, S. J., A. Rampun, and H. Wang. 2018. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms. Computers in biology and medicine 96:178–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., X. Xiang, T. D. Tran, G. D. Hager, and X. Xie, et al. 2018. Adversarial deep structured nets for mass segmentation from mammograms. In 2018 IEEE 15th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA, 847–50.
   Google Scholar