Interpretable Models for the Potentially Harmful Content in Video Games Based on Game Rating Predictions

References

• ACB. 2021. “The australian classification board.” 2021. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00267 .
   Google Scholar
• Alomari, K. M., A. Q. Alhamad, H. O. Mbaidin, and S. Salloum. 2019. Prediction of the digital game rating systems based on the ESRB. Opcion 35 (19):1368–563.
   Google Scholar
• Antwarg, L., R. M. Miller, B. Shapira, and L. Rokach. 2021. Explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using shapley additive explanations[formula presented]. Expert Systems with Applications 186 (August):115736. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115736.
   Google Scholar
• Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador Garcia, Sergio Gil-Lopez, Daniel Molina, Richard Benjamins, Raja Chatila, Francisco Herrera. 2020. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion 58: 82–115. ISSN 1566-2535. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle, V., and I. Papantonis. 2021. Principles and practice of explainable machine learning. Frontiers in Big Data 4 (July):1–25. doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.688969.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstra, J., and Y. Bengio. 2012. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhaupt, R., and F. F. Mueller. 2016. “Game user experience evaluation.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’16, San Jose, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856683 .
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. A., T. M. Connolly, T. Hainey, and J. M. Boyle. 2012. Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (3):771–80. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. A., T. M. Thomas Hainey, G. G. Connolly, J. Earp, M. Ott, T. Lim, M. Ninaus, C. Ribeiro, and J. Pereira. 2016. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 94:178–92. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroux, L., K. Isbister, L. Le Bigot, and N. Vibert. 2015. Player-video game interaction: A systematic review of current concepts. Computers in Human Behavior 48:366–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CERO. 2021. “Computer entertainment rating organization.” 2021. https://www.cero.gr.jp/en/publics/index/17/ .
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, D., H. Başağaoğlu, and J. Winterle. 2021. Interpretable vs. noninterpretable machine learning models for data-driven hydro-climatological process modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 170 (May):2020. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114498.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A., and P. Rad. 2020. Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): A survey. ArXiv 1–24. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11371 .
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, L., C. Silveira, and A. L. Battaiola. 2017. Distinctive features and game design. Entertainment Computing 21:83–93. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström, H., B. B. Marklund, P. Backlund, and M. Toftedahl. 2018. Game development from a software and creative product perspective: A quantitative literature review approach. Entertainment Computing 27:10–22. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2018.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESA. 2020. “2020 essential facts about the video game industry.” Entertainment Software Association. https://www.theesa.com/resource/2020-essential-facts/ .
   Google Scholar
• ESRB. 2021. “The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ERSB).” 2021. https://www.esrb.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Felini, D. 2015. Beyond today’s video game rating systems: A critical approach to PEGI and ESRB, and proposed improvements. Games and Culture 10 (1):106–22. doi:10.1177/1555412014560192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., F. Herrera, O. Cordon, M. J. Del Jesus, and F. Marcelloni. 2019. Evolutionary fuzzy systems for explainable artificial intelligence: why, when, what for, and where to? IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 14 (1):69–81. doi:10.1109/MCI.2018.2881645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbiadini, A., P. Riva, L. Andrighetto, C. Volpato, and B. J. Bushman. 2016. Acting like a tough guy: violent-sexist video games, identification with game characters, masculine beliefs, & empathy for female violence victims. PLoS ONE 11 (4):1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, C. E., M. J. Rothrock, and A. Mishra. 2019. Comparison between random forest and gradient boosting machine methods for predicting listeria spp. prevalence in the environment of pastured poultry farms. Food Research International 122:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRB. 2021. “Game rating board.” 2021. https://www.grac.or.kr/english/ .
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M. 2005. Video games and health. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 331 (7509):122–23. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7509.122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gros, L., N. Debue, J. Lete, and C. van de Leemput. 2020. Video game addiction and emotional states: Possible confusion between pleasure and happiness? Frontiers in Psychology 10 (January):1–21. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02894.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., A. Monreale, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, D. Pedreschi, and F. Giannotti. 2018. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ArXiv 51:5.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, R. S., and N. Shiratuddin. 2016. Filtering violence and sexual content: The necessities of digital games content rating system for malaysia’s environment. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering 8 (8):83–89 .
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, C., K. W. Nilsson, J. Leppert, and Å. Cecilia. 2015. Effects of adolescent online gaming time and motives on depressive, musculoskeletal, and psychosomatic symptoms. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 120 (4):263–75. doi:10.3109/03009734.2015.1049724 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joharestani, Z., C. C. Mehdi, N. Xiliang, B. Bashir, and S. Talebiesfandarani. 2019. PM2.5 prediction based on random forest, xgboost, and deep learning using multisource remote sensing data. Atmosphere. doi:10.3390/atmos10070373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, S., M. Raihan, N. Alvi, M. Afrin, L. Akter, S. A. Sohagi, and E. Podder. 2020. “Breast cancer risk prediction using XGBoost and random forest algorithm.” In 2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 1–4, Kharagpur, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225451 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaggle. 2021. “ESRB rating dataset.” https://www.kaggle.com/imohtn/video-games-rating-by-esrb .
   Google Scholar
• Karakoç, B., K. Eryılmaz, E. T. Özpolat, and İ. Yıldırım. 2020. The effect of game-based learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09471-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardani, N., A. Zhou, M. Nazem, and S.-L. Shen. 2021. Improved prediction of slope stability using a hybrid stacking ensemble method based on finite element analysis and field data. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 13 (1):188–201. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiziloz, H. E. 2021. Classifier ensemble methods in feature selection. Neurocomputing 419:97–107. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapič, S., A. Malhi, R. Saluja, and F. Kary. 2021. Explainable artificial intelligence for human decision support system in the medical domain. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 3 (3):740–70. doi:10.3390/make3030037.
   Google Scholar
• Laczniak, R. N., L. Carlson, D. Walker, and E. Deanne Brocato. 2017. Parental restrictive mediation and children’s violent video game play: The effectiveness of the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) rating system. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 36 (1):70–78. doi:10.1509/jppm.15.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., D. Oster, T. Speith, H. Hermanns, L. Kästner, E. Schmidt, A. Sesing, and K. Baum. 2021. what do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artificial Intelligence 296:103473. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., H. S. Kim, and S. Choi. 2021. Violent video games and aggression: stimulation or catharsis or both? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 24 (1):41–47. doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. Y., Q. Du, and X. Gao. 2020. Adolescent aggression and violent video games: The role of moral disengagement and parental rearing patterns. Children and Youth Services Review 118 (2):105370. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105370.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and W. Chen. 2020. A comparative performance assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Mathematics 8 (10):1–19. doi:10.3390/math8101756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., C. Wang, and K. U. Jan Khan. 2021. Application and comparison of different ensemble learning machines combining with a novel sampling strategy for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 35 (6):1243–56. doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01893-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linardatos, P., V. Papastefanopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis. 2021. Explainable Ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy 23 (1):1–45. doi:10.3390/e23010018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Z. C. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability. Queue 16 (3):31–57. doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 .
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Z. Xu, Y. Kang, Y. Cao, B. Liu, L. Pei, R. Wang, and R. Wang. 2021. “False invoicing feature identification and risk prediction.” In 2021 36th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), 809–14, Nanchang, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/YAC53711.2021.9486639 .
   Google Scholar
• Magesh, P. R., R. D. Myloth, and R. J. Tom. 2020. An explainable machine learning model for early detection of parkinson’s disease using LIME on DaTSCAN imagery. Computers in Biology and Medicine 126 (July):104041. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104041 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mao, W., Y. Cui, M. M. Chiu, and H. Lei. 2021. Effects of Game-based learning on students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 59(8): 1682-1708. 07356331211007098 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDA. 2021. “Media development authority.” 2021. https://www.imda.gov.sg/regulations-and-licensing-listing/content-standards-and-classification/standards-and-classification/video-games .
   Google Scholar
• Media, F. L. 2020. “Report: gaming revenue to top $159B in 2020.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/esports-business-gaming-revenues-idUSFLM8jkJMl .
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Y., N. Yang, Z. Qian, and G. Zhang. 2021. What makes an online review more helpful: An interpretation framework using xgboost and shap values. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16 (3):466–90. doi:10.3390/jtaer16030029 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscato, V., A. Picariello, and S. Giancarlo. 2021. A benchmark of machine learning approaches for credit score prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 165:113986. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113986 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, K. A., W. Chen, B.-S. Lin, and U. Seeboonruang. 2021. Comparison of ensemble machine learning methods for soil erosion pin measurements. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10 (1):42. doi:10.3390/ijgi10010042 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., and S. Landau. 2019. Effects of gaming on children’s brains: Depression and social isolation. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 6 (9):291–302. doi:10.14738/assrj.69.4856 .
   Google Scholar
• Nor, A. K. M., S. R. Pedapati, M. Muhammad, and V. Leiva. 2021. “Explainable artificial intelligence for anomaly detection and prognostic of gas turbines using uncertainty quantification with sensor-related data explainable artificial intelligence for anomaly detection and prognostic of gas turbines using uncertainty Q,” no. September. DOI:10.20944/preprints202109.0034.v2 .
   Google Scholar
• OFLC. 2021. “Office of film & literature classification, New Zealand.” 2021. https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj19/censorship-new-zealand-challenges19-pages1-13.html .
   Google Scholar
• Palatnik de, S. I., M. M. B. Rebuzzi Vellasco, and E. C. Da Silva. 2019. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for classification of lymph node metastases. Sensors (Switzerland) 19 (13):7–9. doi:10.3390/s19132969 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsa, A. B., A. Movahedi, H. Taghipour, S. Derrible, and A. (Kouros) Mohammadian. 2020. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 136 (October 2019):105405. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PEGI. 2021. “The Pan European Game Information (PEGI).” 2021. https://pegi.info/what-do-the-labels-mean .
   Google Scholar
• Quwaider, M., A. Alabed, and R. Duwairi. 2019. The impact of video games on the players behaviors: A survey. Procedia Computer Science 151 (2018):575–82. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.077 .
   Google Scholar
• Sălceanu, C. 2014. The influence of computer games on children’s development. Exploratory study on the attitudes of parents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149:837–41. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.323.
   Google Scholar
• Siervo, M., S. Sabatini, M. S. Fewtrell, and J. C. K. Wells. 2013. Acute effects of violent video-game playing on blood pressure and appetite perception in normal-weight young men: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 67 (12):1322–24. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, R., and A. Zile. 2017. Does emotional arousal influence swearing fluency? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46 (4):983–95. doi:10.1007/s10936-016-9473-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjoa, E., and C. Guan. 2020. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Toward medical XAI. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems November:1–21. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027314.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018. “World health organization.” https://www.who.int/features/qa/gaming-disorder/en/.
   Google Scholar