Prediction in Traffic Accident Duration Based on Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning

References

• Al-Deek, H., and E. B. Emam. 2006. New methodology for estimating reliability in transportation networks with degraded link capacities. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 10 (3):117–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, N. V., K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, et al. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16:321–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. Q., and C. Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, California, USA, 785–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cong, H., C. Chen, P. S. Lin, et al. 2018. Traffic incident duration estimation based on a dual-learning Bayesian network model. Transportation Research Record 2672 (45):196–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, T., and P. Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13 (1):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiroluk, S., and K. Ozbay. 2014. Adaptive learning in Bayesian networks for incident duration prediction. Transportation Research Record 2460 (1):77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, L., and E. I. Vlahogianni. 2015. Fuzzy modeling of freeway accident duration with rainfall and traffic flow interactions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 5:59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., A. Skabardonis, M. Carroll, et al. 2004. Methodology for measuring recurrent and nonrecurrent traffic congestion. Transportation Research Record 1867 (1):60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. 2016. Adversarial validation, part one. http://fastml.com/adversarial-validation-part-one/ 2021. Accessed Jul 8, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics 29 (5):1189–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyon, I., and A. Elisseeff. 2003. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (3):1157–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad, K., M. A. Khalil, and A. R. Alozi. 2020. Predicting freeway incident duration using machine learning. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 18 (2):367–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad, K., R. Al-Ruzouq, W. Zeiada, et al. 2020. Predicting incident duration using random forests. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 16 (3):1269–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haule, H. J., T. Sando, R. Lentz, et al. 2019. Evaluating the impact and clearance duration of freeway incidents. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 8 (1):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hojati, A. T., L. Ferreira, S. Washington, et al. 2013. Hazard based models for freeway traffic incident duration. Accident Analysis & Prevention 52 ():171–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojati, A. T., L. Ferreira, S. Washington, et al. 2014. Modelling total duration of traffic incidents including incident detection and recovery time. Accident Analysis & Prevention 71:296–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S. 2017. Covariate shift - unearthing hidden problems in real world data science. https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2017/07/covariate-shift-the-hidden-problem-of-real-world-data-science/. 2021. Accessed Jul 8, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, G., Q. Meng, T. Finley, et al. 2017. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30:3146–54.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak, A. J., J. Liu, B. Wali, et al. 2016. Modeling traffic incident duration using quantile regression. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2554 (1):139–48.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., F. C. Pereira, and M. E. Ben-Akiva. 2015. Competing risks mixture model for traffic incident duration prediction. Accident Analysis & Prevention 75:192–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., A. K. Sahu, A. Talwalkar, et al. 2020. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 37(3): 50–60. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., and R. Li. 2020. Real-time traffic accidents post-impact prediction: Based on crowdsourcing data. Accident Analysis & Prevention 145:105696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. M., G. Erion, H. Chen, et al. 2020. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence 2 (1):56–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg, S. M., and S. I. Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing systems, Long Beach, California, USA, 4768–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., C. Ding, S. Luan, et al. 2017. Prioritizing influential factors for freeway incident clearance time prediction using the gradient boosting decision trees method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18 (9):2303–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mfinanga, D., and E. Fungo. 2013. Impact of incidents on traffic congestion in Dar es Salaam city. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 2 (2):95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Micci-Barreca, D. 2001. A preprocessing scheme for high-cardinality categorical attributes in classification and prediction problems. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 3 (1):27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, S., M. H. Samavatian, S. Parthasarathy, et al. A countrywide traffic accident dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2019a, preprint arXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, S., M. H. Samavatian, S. Parthasarathy, et al. 2019b. Accident risk prediction based on heterogeneous sparse data new dataset and insights. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2019b33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Torres, J. G, T. Raeder, R. Alaiz-Rodríguez, et al. 2012. A unifying view on dataset shift in classification. Pattern Recognition 45 (1):521–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, D., and F. Mannering. 2000. An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 34 (2):85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbay, K., and N. Noyan. 2006. Estimation of incident clearance times using Bayesian networks approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 (3):542–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokhorenkova, L., G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, et al. 2017. CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.09516.
   Google Scholar
• Raschka, S. 2015. Python machine learning. Birmingham, UK: Packt publishing ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Snoek, J., H. Larochelle, and R. P. Adams. 2012. Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25:2960–68.
   Google Scholar
• Stekhoven, D. J., and P. Bühlmann. 2012. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28 (1):112–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., L. Zheng, C. Han, et al. 2020. Traffic incident clearance time prediction and influencing factor analysis using extreme gradient boosting model. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2020 (1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, G., M. Lelli, and D. Cucina. 2010. A comparative study of models for the incident duration prediction. European Transport Research Review 2 (2):103–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., S. Chen, and W. Zheng. 2013. Traffic incident duration prediction based on partial least squares regression. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 96:425–32.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, A., and R. Friswell. 2011. Investigating the relative effects of sleep deprivation and time of day on fatigue and performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43 (3):690–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. H. 1992. Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5 (2):241–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Y. Liu, T. Chen, et al. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10 (2):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, A., and A. Casari. 2018. Feature engineering for machine learning: Principles and techniques for data scientists. Sebastopol, California, USA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, H., and T. Hastie. 2005. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 67 (2):301–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar