How to Apply Artificial Intelligence for Social Innovations

References

• Aguilera, R. V., D. E. Rupp, C. A. Williams, and J. Ganapathi. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32 (3):836–1836. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameriks, K., and D. M. Clarke. 2000. Aristotle: nicomachean ethics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J., and Z. Lin. 2002. Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Research Policy 31 (1):1–18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00110-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., C. Cruz, L. R. Gomez-Mejia, and M. Larraza-Kintana. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1):82–113. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyler, M., and R. W. Coff. 2003. Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal 24 (7):677–86. doi:10.1002/smj.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., B. Obel, and D. D. HWaakonsson. 2015. Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32 (3):946–67. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R. W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10 (2):119–33. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, A., G. Palazzo, L. J. Spence, and D. Matten. 2014. Contesting the value of “creating shared value. California Management Review 56 (2):130–53. doi:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, D., M. Zollo, and M. T. Hansen. 2012. Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal 55 (6):1429–48. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ 2 (4):169–87.
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., S. Iammarino, M. Savona, and N. Von Tunzelmann. 2012. What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy 41 (2):482–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas, M. A., and M. W. Toffel. 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal 29 (10):1027–55. doi:10.1002/smj.701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorobantu, S., L. Nartey, and W. J. Henisz. 2013. First impressions: stakeholder networks, proactive engagement & stakeholder opinions of companies. Academy of Management Proceedings 2013 (1):17448. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.17448abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Dorobantu, S., W. J. Henisz, and L. Nartey. 2017. Not all Sparks light a fire: Stakeholder and shareholder reactions to critical events in contested markets. Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (3):561–97. doi:10.1177/0001839216687743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, 2018. Two-Thirds of consumers worldwide now buy on beliefs. https://www.edelman.com/news-awards/two-thirds-consumers-worldwide-now-buy-beliefs
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. 2019. Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galia, F., and D. Legros. 2004. Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: Evidence from France. Research Policy 33 (8):1185–99. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill, and J. M. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30 (4):425–45. doi:10.1002/smj.750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30 (4):777–98. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., L. Preuss, J. Pinkse, and F. Figge. 2014. Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review 39 (4):463–87. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. J., S. Dorobantu, and L. J. Nartey. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal 35 (12):1727–48. doi:10.1002/smj.2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan (Project Gutenberg eBook of Leviathan, 2009). http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3207
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. 1962. The age of revolution: Europe 1748-1848. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrassia, L. 2020. Billion dollar brand club: how dollar shave club, warby parker, and other disruptors are remaking what we buy. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, N. R. 2000. On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence 117 (2):277–96. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00107-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., D. Palmer, A. N. Phillips, D. Kiron, and N. Buckley. 2015. Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. 14 (1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H.-G., W. Woo, R. M. Burton, and W. Mitchell. 2018. Constructing M&A valuation: How do merger evaluation methods differ as uncertainty and conflict vary? Journal of Organization Design 7 (1):2. doi:10.1186/s41469-017-0025-y.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1921. A treatise on probability. North Chelmsford, Massachusetts: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1937. The general theory of employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 51 (2):209–23. doi:10.2307/1882087.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., G. Lee, and H.-G. Kang. 2021. Risk management and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal 42 (1):202–30. doi:10.1002/smj.3224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klügl, F., and A. L. Bazzan. 2012. Agent-based modeling and simulation. Ai Magazine 33 (3):29–29. doi:10.1609/aimag.v33i3.2425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. North Chelmsford, Massachusetts: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, P.-S., C. Qian, and H. Wang. 2014. Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal 35 (10):1464–82. doi:10.1002/smj.2171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korinek, A., and J. E. Stiglitz. 2017. Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and unemployment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, D., and N. T. Washburn. 2012. Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review 37 (2):300–26. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theology. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1):117–27. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. H. 1987. Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. Hoboken, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Direct.
   Google Scholar
• Minor, D., and J. Morgan. 2011. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review 53 (3):40–59. doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.53.3.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrar, R., H. Arman, and S. Mousa. 2017. The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (11):12–20. doi:10.22215/timreview/1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. 2007. Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated.
   Google Scholar
• Okhmatovskiy, I., and R. J. David. 2012. Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organization Science 23 (1):155–76. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16 (1):145–79. doi:10.2307/258610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., T. Finin, Y. Labrou, R. S. Cost, B. T. Chu, J. Long, W. J. Tolone, and A. Boughannam. 1999. Agent-based approach for manufacturing integration: The CIIMPLEX experience. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13 (1–2):39–63. doi:10.1080/088395199117487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer (2011, January 1). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, (January-February 2011). https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value
   Google Scholar
• Railsback, S. F., and V. Grimm. 2019. Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, W., and Gordijn, B. 2019, 'Moving from value sensitive design to virtuous practice design', Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (2):196–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolnick, D., P. L. Donti, L. H. Kaack, K. Kochanski, A. Lacoste, K. Sankaran, A. S. Ross, N. Milojevic-Dupont, N. Jaques, and A. Waldman-Brown (2019). Tackling climate change with machine learning. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1906.05433.
   Google Scholar
• Shiu, Y.-M., and S.-L. Yang. 2017. Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strategic Management Journal 38 (2):455–70. doi:10.1002/smj.2494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, P. A., and B. Masters. 2014. Zero to one: Notes on startups, or how to build the future. New York, NY: Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Umbrello, S. 2020. Combinatory and Complementary Practices of Values and Virtues in Design: A Reply to Reijers and Gordijn. Filosofia 65:107–121. https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/5236
   Google Scholar
• Umbrello, S., & van de Poel, I. 2021. Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI and Ethics 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallor, S. 2016. Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, T. L., C. Navis, and G. Fisher. 2013. Explaining differences in firms’ responses to activism. Academy of Management Review 38 (3):397–417. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, C. 2019. Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, B. M., and D. Z. Seker. 2019. Designing weather forecasting model using computational intelligence tools. Applied Artificial Intelligence 33 (2):137–51. doi:10.1080/08839514.2018.1530858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar