A Bayesian Allocation Model Based Approach to Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels

References

• Airoldi, E. M., D. M. Blei, S. E. Fienberg, and E. P. Xing. 2008. Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 (Sep):1981–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Heidelberg: Information Science and Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. 2014. Build, compute, critique, repeat: Data analysis with latent variable models. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 1:203–32. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research (3):993–1022. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v3/blei03a.html
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 10:10008. http://stacks.iop.org/1742-5468/2008/i=10/a=P10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brian, K., and M. E. J. Newman. 2011. Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical Review E 83 (1):016107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntine, W. 2002. Variational extensions to EM and multinomial PCA. In Machine Learning: ECML, eds. T. Elomaa, H. Mannila, and H. Toivonen, 23–34. vol. 2002, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. isbn: 978-3-540- 36755-0.
   Google Scholar
• Buntine, A., Wray, and Jakulin. 2006. isbn: 978-3-540-34138-3 Discrete Component Analysis. In Subspace, latent structure and feature selection,eds. C. Saunders, M. Grobelnik, S. Gunn, and J. ShaweShaweTaylor, 1–33. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Canny, J. F. 2004. “GaP: A factor model for discrete data.” In SIGIR 2004: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Sheffield, UK, July 25-29, 122–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cemgil, A. T., M. Burak Kurutmaz, S. Yıldırım, M. Barsbey, and U. Simsekli. 2019. Bayesian allocation model: Inference by sequential monte carlo for nonnegative tensor factorizations and topic models using polya urns. ArXiv. abs/1903.04478.
   Google Scholar
• Fosdick, B. K., T. H. McCormick, T. Brendan Murphy, T. Lok James Ng, and T. Westling. 2019. Multiresolution network models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 28 (1):185–96. doi:10.1080/10618600.2018.1505633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J., A. Bhattacharya, and D. Pati. 2019. Probabilistic community detection with unknown number of communities. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 114(526):893–905.10.1080/01621459.2018.1458618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, M., T. P. Peixoto, and E. G. Altmann. 2018. A network approach to topic models. Science Advances 4 (7):eaaq1360. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaq1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, A., A. X. Zheng, S. E. Fienberg, and E. M. Airoldi . 2010. A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning. 2(2):129–233. doi:10.1561/2200000005.
   Google Scholar
• Hızlı, Ç., A. Taylan Cemgil, and S. Kırbız. 2019. “Model selection for relational data factorization.” In 2019 27th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Sivas, Turkey. IEEE. 10.1109/SIU47150.2019.8977398.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., K. Blackmond Laskey, and S. Leinhardt. 1983. Stochastic blockmodels: First steps. Social Networks 5 (2):109–37. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(83)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., and M. Welling. 2019. An introduction to variational autoencoders. CoRR. abs/1906.02691. arXiv: 1906.02691. http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02691
   Google Scholar
• Latouche, P., E. Birmele, and C. Ambroise . 2011. Overlapping stochastic block models with application to the French political blogosphere. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 5(1):309–36. doi:10.1214/10-AOAS382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latouche, P., E. Birmele, and C. Ambroise. 2012. Variational Bayesian inference and complexity control for stochastic block models. Statistical Modelling 12 (1):93–115. doi:10.1177/1471082X1001200105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, C. M., and E. Levina. 2019. Estimating the number of communities in networks by spectral methods. arXiv: 1507.00827 [stat.ML].
   Google Scholar
• Lusseau, D., K. Schneider, O. J. Boisseau, P. Haase, E. Slooten, and S. M. Dawson. 2003. The bottlenose dolphin community of doubtful sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54 (4):396–405. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, R. M. 2001. Annealed importance sampling. Statistics and Computing 11 (2):125–39. doi:10.1023/A:1008923215028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2006a. Finding community structure in networks using the eigen- vectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74 (3):036104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2006b. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (23):8577–82. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J., and G. Reinert. 2016. Estimating the number of communities in a network. Physical Review Letters 117 (7):078301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.078301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, R., Y. Zhou, B. Cao, N. N. Liu, R. Lukose, M. Scholz, and Q. Yang. 2008. One-Class Collaborative Filtering. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 15-19 December 2008, Pisa, Italy, 502–11. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2008.16.
   Google Scholar
• Peixoto, T. P. 2015. Model selection and hypothesis testing for large-scale network models with overlapping groups. Physical Review 5 (1):011033.
   Google Scholar
• Peixoto, T. P. 2017. Bayesian stochastic blockmodeling. arXiv. preprint arXiv:1705.10225.
   Google Scholar
• Riolo, M. A., G. T. Cantwell, G. Reinert, and M. E. J. Newman. 2017. Efficient method for estimating the number of communities in a network. Physical Review 96 (3):032310. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032310.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1976. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63 (3):581–92. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, A., M. Zhou, D. M. Blei, and H. M. Wallach. 2016. “Bayesian poisson tucker decomposition for learning the structure of international relations.” In Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, New Y ork City, NY, USA, June 19-24, 2810–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zachary, W. W. 1977. An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 33 (4):452–73. doi:10.1086/jar.33.4.3629752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar