Yield-SpikeSegNet: An Extension of SpikeSegNet Deep-Learning Approach for the Yield Estimation in the Wheat Using Visual Images

References

• Agostinelli, F., M. Hoffman, P. Sadowski, and P. Baldi. 2014. Learning activation functions to improve deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6830, December 21.
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi, N., J. Zhou, and W. Wang. 2018. Automatic counting of wheat spikes from wheat growth images. ICPRAM, 346–3302.
   Google Scholar
• Asundi, A., and Z. Wensen. 1998. Fast phase-unwrapping algorithm based on a gray-scale mask and flood fill. Applied Optics 37 (23):5416–20, August 10. doi:10.1364/AO.37.005416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, K., P. Jiang, L. Li, B. Shi, and C. Wang. 2010 Non-destructive measurement of wheat spike characteristics based on morphological image processing. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 26(12):212–16, December 1.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. T., H. Walia, A. Grondin, and A. Knecht. 2017. Genetic and computational approaches for studying plant development and abiotic stress responses using image-based phenotyping AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 2017:B41J–06, December.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, R. A., and N. A. Campbell. 1997. On the pairing of the softmax activation and cross-entropy penalty functions and the derivation of the softmax activation function. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Conference on the Neural Networks, vol. 181, 185. Melbourne: Citeseer, June 30.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlgren, N., M. Feldman, M. A. Gehan, M. S. Wilson, C. Shyu, D. W. Bryant, S. T. Hill, C. J. McEntee, S. N. Warnasooriya, I. Kumar, et al. 2015 A versatile phenotyping system and analytics platform reveals diverse temporal responses to water availability in setaria. Molecular Plant 8(10):1520–35, October 5. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, S., F. Guenther, and M. F. Guenther. 2019. Package ‘neuralnet’ Training of Neural Networks. The R Journal, February 7.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, O., S. Blangiforti, and G. Venora. 2017. A wheat landraces identification through glumes image analysis Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 141:223–31, September 1. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Großkinsky, D. K., J. Svensgaard, S. Christensen, and T. Roitsch. 2015. Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(18):5429–40, September 1. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., T. Czauderna, R. Hoffmann, N. Stein, and F. Schreiber. 2011. Htpheno: An image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 12(1):1–9, December. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasan, M. M., J. P. Chopin, H. Laga, and S. J. Miklavcic. 2010. Detection and analysis of wheat spikes using convolutional neural networks. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 26(12):212–16, December 1.
   Google Scholar
• Houle, D., D. R. Govindaraju, and S. Omholt. 2010. Phenomics: The next challenge. Nature Reviews Genetics 11(12):855–66, December. doi:10.1038/nrg2897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioffe, S., and C. Szegedy. 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. International Conference on Machine Learning, 448–56. PMLR, June 1.
   Google Scholar
• Isabelle, B. B., M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik. 1992. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. COLT, 92.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, R. R., G. Jaswal, D. Gupta, S. Saini, and A. Nigam. 2020. PixIsegnet: Pixel[u+2010]level iris segmentation network using convolutional encoder–decoder with stacked hourglass bottleneck. IET Biometrics 9(1):11–24, January. doi:10.1049/iet-bmt.2019.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., and J. Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. December 22.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, X., C. Shen, and Y. B. Yang. 2016. Image restoration using very deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks with symmetric skip connections. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29:2802–10.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D., E. Dimitriadou, K. Hornik, A. Weingessel, F. Leisch, C. C. Chang, C.C. Lin, and M. D. Meyer. 2019. Package ‘e1071’. The R Journal November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, T., A. Arora, S. Marwaha, V. Chinnusamy, A. R. Rao, R. Jain, R. N. Sahoo, M. Ray, S. Kumar, D. Raju, et al. 2020. SpikeSegnet-a deep learning approach utilizing encoder-decoder network with hourglass for spike segmentation and counting in wheat plant from visual imaging. Plant Methods 16(1):1–20, December. doi:10.1186/s13007-020-00582-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, T., A. Arora, S. Marwaha, R. R. Jha, M. Ray, R. Jain, A. R. Rao, E. Varghese, S. Kumar, S. Kumar, et al. 2021a. Web-SpikeSegnet: Deep learning framework for recognition and counting of spikes from visual images of wheat plants. IEEE Access 9:76235–47, May 17. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3080836.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, T., S. Marwaha, A. Arora, M. Ray, S. Kumar, S. Kumar, and V. Chinnusamy. 2021b. Leaf area assessment using image processing and support vector regression in rice. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(3 388–392), March 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, M. P., J. A. Atkinson, D. M. Wells, T. P. Pridmore, and A. P. French. 2017. Deep learning for multi-task plant phenotyping. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops Venice, Italy, 2055–63.
   Google Scholar
• Qiongyan, L., J. Cai, B. Berger, M. Okamoto, and S. J. Miklavcic. 2017. Detecting spikes of wheat plants using neural networks with laws texture energy. Plant Methods 13(1):1–3, December. doi:10.1186/s13007-017-0231-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahaman, M., D. Chen, Z. Gillani, C. Klukas, and M. Chen. 2015. Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:619, August 10. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, M., K.N. Singh, V. Ramasubramanian, R. K. Paul, A. Mukherjee, and S. Rathod. 2020. Integration of wavelet transform with ann and wnn for time series forecasting: an application to indian monsoon rainfall. National Academy Science Letters 43(6):509–13, November. doi:10.1007/s40009-020-00887-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger, O., P. Fischer, and T. Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention, 234–41. Cham: Springer, October 5.
   Google Scholar
• Tanuj, M., A. Alka, M. Sudeep, R. Mrinmoy, R. Dhandapani, K. Sudhir, G. Swati, R. N. Sahoo, and C. Viswanathan. 2019. Leaf area assessment using image processing and support vector regression in rice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89 (10):1698–702.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C., P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhou, Z. Wang, Y. Du, W. Mao, W. Li, D. Wang, and W. Guo. 2020 Rapid recognition of field-grown wheat spikes based on a superpixel segmentation algorithm using digital images. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:259, March 6 doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., C. Balzer, J. Hill, and B. L. Befort. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(50):20260–64, December 13. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaftaris, S. A., M. Minervini, and H. Scharr. 2016. Machine learning for plant phenotyping needs image processing. Trends in Plant Science 21(12):989–91, December 1. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V. 1998. The support vector method of function estimation. Nonlinear modeling, 55–85 Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar