Meta Learning-Based Dynamic Ensemble Model for Crop Selection

References

• Abdallah, B., R. G. Emna, and K. Boukadi. 2022. A machine learning-based approach for smart agriculture via stacking-based ensemble learning and feature selection methods. 2022 18th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 2022 - Proceedings. IEEE. doi:10.1109/IE54923.2022.9826767.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulkareem, K. H., A. A. Z. Nureize Arbaiy, B. B. Zaidan, O. S. Albahri, M. A. Alsalem, M. M. Salih, and M. M. Salih. 2020. A novel multi-perspective benchmarking framework for selecting image dehazing intelligent algorithms based on BWM and group VIKOR techniques. International Journal of Information Technology\& Decision Making 19 (03):909–3627. doi:10.1142/S0219622020500169.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, W., Muhammad, Siddiqui, K. Muhammad, F. I. Fahad, and I. Siddiqui. 2020. Applied artificial intelligence predicting calorific value of thar lignite deposit: A comparison between back-propagation neural networks (BPNN), gradient boosting trees (GBT), and multiple linear regression (MLR). Applied Artificial Intelligence 34 (14):1124–36. doi:10.1080/08839514.2020.1824091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram, M., C. Kahraman, and K. Zahid. 2021. Group decision-making based on complex spherical fuzzy VIKOR approach. Knowledge-Based Systems 216:106793. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol, K. 2020. Stacking ensemble based deep neural networks modeling for effective epileptic seizure detection. Expert Systems with Applications 148 (June):113239. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2020.113239. Pergamon
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, R., L. Soltanisehat, P. D. Lund, and H. Zamanisabzi. 2020. Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method. Energy Policy 137:111174. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anilkumar, C., N. C. Sunitha, Harikrishna, N. B. Devate, S. Ramesh. 2022. Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: A review. Planta 256 (5):1–20. doi:10.1007/s00425-022-03996-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansarifar, E., F. Shahidi, M. Mohebbi, N. Ramezanian, A. Koocheki, and A. Mohamadian. 2019. Optimization of limonene microencapsulation based on native and fibril soy protein isolate by VIKOR method. LWT 115:107884. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.02.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L.E.O. 2013. Random forests _ enhanced reader.Pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carlon, A. G., B. Mansour Dia, L. Espath, R. Holdorf Lopez, and R. Tempone. 2020. Nesterov-aided stochastic gradient methods using laplace approximation for bayesian design optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 363(May : 112909. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.112909.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalin, P. R., R. Sabourin, and C. Y. Suen. 2010. Dynamic selection of ensembles of classifiers using contextual information BT - multiple classifier systems. In International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems,145–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalin, P. R., R. Sabourin, and C. Y. Suen. 2012. LoGID: An adaptive framework combining local and global incremental learning for dynamic selection of ensembles of HMMs. Pattern recognition 45: 3544–56. Pergamon. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2012.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalin, P. R., R. Sabourin, and C. Y. Suen. 2013. Dynamic selection approaches for multiple classifier systems. Neural Computing & Applications 22 (3):673–88. doi:10.1007/s00521-011-0737-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. M. O., G. D. C. Cavalcanti, and T. Ing Ren. November. 2018. A method for dynamic ensemble selection based on a filter and an adaptive distance to improve the quality of the regions of competence. doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2011.6033350.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. M. O., D. V. R. Oliveira, G. D. C. Cavalcanti, and R. Sabourin. September. 2018. FIRE-DES++: Enhanced online pruning of base classifiers for dynamic ensemble selection. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.037.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. M. O., R. Sabourin, and G. D. C. Cavalcanti. 2015. META-DES.H: A dynamic ensemble selection technique using meta-learning and a dynamic weighting approach. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 1–8. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280594.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. M. O., R. Sabourin, and G. D. C. Cavalcanti. 2018b. Dynamic classifier selection: Recent advances and perspectives. Information Fusion 41:195–216. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, R. M. O., R. Sabourin, G. D. C. Cavalcanti, and T. Ing Ren. 2015. “META-DES: A dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning.” Pattern Recognition 48 (5). Elsevier Ltd: 1925–35. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepa, N., R. M. Durai, K. N. Senthil, K. Srinivasan, C.-Y. Chang, and A. K. Bashir. 2019. An efficient ensemble VTOPES multi-criteria decision-making model for sustainable sugarcane farms. Sustainability 11 (16):4288. doi:10.3390/su11164288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepa, N., and K. Ganesan. 2018. Multi-class classification using hybrid soft decision model for agriculture crop selection. Neural Computing & Applications 30 (4):1025–38. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2749-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepa, N., and K. Ganesan. 2019. Decision-making tool for crop selection for agriculture development. Neural Computing & Applications 31 (4):1215–25. doi:10.1007/s00521-017-3154-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepa, N., B. P. Mohammad Zubair Khan, P. M. Durai Raj Vincent, P. Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, T. Reddy Gadekallu, and T. R. Gadekallu. 2020. Multi-class model for agriculture development using multivariate statistical method. IEEE Access 8:183749–58. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaram, J., O. Fatahi Valilai, M. Houshamand, and F. Ashtiani. 2021. A matching mechanism for public cloud manufacturing platforms using intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR and deferred acceptance algorithm. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management 16 (2):107–22. doi:10.1080/17509653.2021.1892549. Taylor & Francis
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhivya, E., and P. M. D. Raj Vincent. 2021. Multi-class model for agriculture development using multivariate statistical method. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12(11 : 10009–22. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02752-y.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, R., D. Smith, R. Rawnsley, G. Bishop-Hurley, J. Hills, G. Timms, and D. Henry. 2015. Dynamic cattle behavioural classification using supervised ensemble classifiers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 111 (February):18–28. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.12.002. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Emovon, I., and O. Stephen Oghenenyerovwho. 2020. Application of MCDM method in material selection for optimal design: A review. Results in Materials 7:100115. doi:10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100115.
   Google Scholar
• Filho, L., S. Jose Augusto, M. P. C. Anne, and R. Hugo Nunes Santiago. 2018. Investigating the impact of selection criteria in dynamic ensemble selection methods. Expert Systems with Applications 106:141–53. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontmatter. 2004. In combining pattern classifiers vols. i–xx. Wiley Online Books. Wiley. 10.1002/0471660264.fmatter
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., B. Ren, H. Zhang, B. Sun, J. Li, J. Xu, Y. He, and K. Li. 2020. An ensemble imbalanced classification method based on model dynamic selection driven by data partition hybrid sampling. Expert Systems with Applications 160:113660. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, S., Z. Liang Zhang, A. Altalhi, S. Alshomrani, and F. Herrera. 2018. Dynamic ensemble selection for multi-class imbalanced datasets. Information Sciences 445–446(June : 22–37. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Gertz, M., K. Große-Butenuth, W. Junge, B. Maassen-Francke, C. Renner, H. Sparenberg, and J. Krieter. 2020. Using the XGBoost algorithm to classify neck and leg activity sensor data using on-farm health recordings for locomotor-associated diseases. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 173 (June):105404. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105404. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, J. M., G. Pajares, M. Montalvo, J. Romeo, and M. Guijarro. 2012. Support vector machines for crop/weeds identification in maize fields. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (12):11149–55. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2012.03.040. Pergamon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, W.-H., X.-K. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, J.-Q. Wang, and L. Li. 2020. A novel dynamic ensemble selection classifier for an imbalanced data Set: An application for credit risk assessment. Knowledge-Based Systems 208:106462. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, J., H. Li, M. Li, and B. Chen. 2020. Prediction of dissolved oxygen in aquaculture based on gradient boosting decision tree and long short-term memory network: A study of chang zhou fishery demonstration base, China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 175 (August):105530. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105530. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Junior, L. M., F. Maria Nardini, C. Renso, R. Trani, and J. Antonio Macedo. 2020. A novel approach to define the local region of dynamic selection techniques in imbalanced credit scoring problems. Expert Systems with Applications 152:113351. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadkhodaei, H. R., A. Masoud Eftekhari Moghadam, and M. Dehghan. 2020. Hboost: A heterogeneous ensemble classifier based on the boosting method and entropy measurement. Expert Systems with Applications 157(November : 113482. Pergamon. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2020.113482.
   Google Scholar
• Kessentini, Y., T. Burger, and T. Paquet. 2015. A dempster-shafer theory based combination of handwriting recognition systems with multiple rejection strategies. Pattern recognition 48(2): 534–44. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, B., R. Y. Liang, and J. Gross. 2018. Material selection for repair of structural concrete using VIKOR method. Case Studies in Construction Materials 8:489–97. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2018.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Kinal, M., and M. Woźniak. 2020. Data preprocessing for Des-Knn and its application to imbalanced medical data classification. In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Cham, Swtizerland, 589–99.
   Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, B., M. Woundefinedniak, and H. Francisco. 2015. On the usefulness of one-class classifier ensembles for decomposition of multi-class problems. Pattern Recogn 48(12 : 3969–82. USA: Elsevier Science Inc. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, N. 2008. Feature extraction for classification problems and its application to face recognition. Pattern recognition 41(5 : 1701–17. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2007.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. S., W. Hoe Lam, S. Hafizah Jaaman, and K. Fai Liew. 2021. Performance evaluation of construction companies using integrated entropy–Fuzzy VIKOR model. Entropy 23:3. doi:10.3390/e23030320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., Z. Chen, Z. Xu, X. Gou, and F. Herrera. 2021. Score function based on concentration degree for probabilistic linguistic term sets: An application to TOPSIS and VIKOR. Information Sciences 551:270–90. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. 2021. A minority oversampling approach for fault detection with heterogeneous imbalanced data. Expert Systems with Applications 184 (December):115492. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2021.115492. Pergamon
   Google Scholar
• Markatopoulou, F., G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. 2015. Dynamic ensemble pruning based on multi-label classification. Neurocomputing 150 (PB):501–12. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.07.063. Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed Niyas, K.P., and P. Thiyagarajan. 2021. “Alzheimer’s classification using dynamic ensemble of classifiers selection algorithms: A performance analysis.” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 68. Elsevier: 102729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., and G. Hshiung Tzeng. 2007. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research 178(2 : 514–29. North-Holland. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreszczyn, S., A. Lane, and S. Carr. 2010. The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4 : 404–17. Pergamon. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D., H.-J. Fan, J.-J. Zhu, T. Kim, U. Myoung-Jin, S. Kim, S. Jeon, and K. Jung. 2021. Prioritization in strategic environmental assessment using fuzzy TOPSIS method with random generation for absent information in South Korea. Sustainability 13 (3):1458. doi:10.3390/su13031458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawełand Sabourin, Z., Sabourin, M. Robert, and R. Sabourin. 2021. Pre-processed dynamic classifier ensemble selection for highly imbalanced drifted data streams. Information Fusion 66:138–54. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Gállego, P., A. Castaño, J. Ramón Quevedo, and J. J. Del Coz. 2019. Dynamic ensemble selection for quantification tasks. Information Fusion 45 (January):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.01.001. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• L., Qianmu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, and V. S. Sheng. 2020. Multiclass Imbalanced Learning with One-versus-One Decomposition and Spectral Clustering. Expert Systems with Applications 147. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A., and B. Verma. 2013. Effect of ensemble classifier composition on offline cursive character recognition. Information Processing & Management 49 (4):852–64. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.12.010. Pergamon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeswari, S., and K. Suthendran. 2019. C5.0: Advanced decision tree (ADT) classification model for agricultural data analysis on cloud. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 156 (January):530–39. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.013. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, M., A. Paula, L. Prado Osco, D. Elis Garcia Furuya, W. Nunes Gonçalves, D. Cordeiro Santana, L. Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro, C. A. da Silva Junior, J. Li, F. Henrique Rojo Baio, et al. 2020. A random forest ranking approach to predict yield in maize with uav-based vegetation spectral indices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 178 (November):105791. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105791.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, M. 2021. A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 18 (6):1591–616. doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, R., and S. Kumar Ghosh. 2021. Crop classification in a heterogeneous agricultural environment using ensemble classifiers and single-date sentinel-2A imagery. Geocarto international 36(19 : 2141–59. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/10106049.2019.1700556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, D., M. Eulanda, R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. 2009. Overfitting cautious selection of classifier ensembles with genetic algorithms. Information Fusion 10(2 : 150–62. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2008.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, E. M. D., and R. Sabourin. 2011. “Classifier ensembles optimization guided by population oracle. In 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 693–98. doi:10.1109/CEC.2011.5949686.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, E. M. D., R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. 2007. Ambiguity-guided dynamic selection of ensemble of classifiers. In 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion, 1–8. doi:10.1109/ICIF.2007.4408123.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, B., S. Palani, K. Kotecha, V. Kumar, and V. S. 2022. IoT Driven Artificial Intelligence Technique for Fertilizer Recommendation Model. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 1. doi:10.1109/MCE.2022.3151325.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasz, W., M. Kurzynski, P. Podsiadlo, and G. W. Stachowiak. 2012. A measure of competence based on random classification for dynamic ensemble selection. Information Fusion 13(3 : 207–13. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2011.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., L. L. Minku, and X. Yao. 2018. A systematic study of online class imbalance learning with concept drift. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 29 (10):4802–21. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2771290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woźniak, M., M. Graña, and E. Corchado. 2014. A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Information Fusion 16 (1):3–17. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.006. Elsevier
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J.-J., L. Huai-Wei, C.-S. Chao, C.-C. Shen, and C.-C. Yang. 2020. “Establishing a sustainable sports tourism evaluation framework with a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to explore potential sports tourism attractions in Taiwan.” Sustainability 12 (4). MDPI: 1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., Y. Xu, Q. Cheng, S. Jiang, Q. Wang, Y. Xiao, C. Ma, J. Yan, and X. Wang. 2021. LightGBM: Accelerated genomically designed crop breeding through ensemble learning. Genome Biology 22 (1):1–24. doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02492-y. BioMed Central
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, Z., T. A. Mazzuchi, and S. Sarkani. 2020. M-AdaBoost-A based ensemble system for network intrusion detection. Expert Systems with Applications 162(December : 113864. Pergamon. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2020.113864.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. L., X. Gang Luo, S. García, J. Fu Tang, and F. Herrera. 2017. Exploring the effectiveness of dynamic ensemble selection in the one-versus-one scheme. Knowledge-Based Systems 125(June : 53–63. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.026.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. L., Y. Yu Chen, J. Li, and X. Gang Luo. 2019. “A distance-based weighting framework for boosting the performance of dynamic ensemble selection.” Information Processing and Management 56 (4). Elsevier Ltd: 1300–16. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., X. Zhao, H. Zhou, X. Wang, and X. Xing. 2021. Prediction model for daily reference crop evapotranspiration based on hybrid algorithm and principal components analysis in Southwest China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 190 (August):106424. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106424. Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., C. Xie, G.-J. Wang, and X.-G. Yan. 2017. Comparison of individual, ensemble and integrated ensemble machine learning methods to predict China’s SME credit risk in supply Chain Finance. Neural Computing & Applications 28 (1):41–50. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2304-x.
   Google Scholar