1,300
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analysis of Birth Data using Ensemble Modeling Techniques

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Article: 2158273 | Received 01 Oct 2022, Accepted 07 Dec 2022, Published online: 28 Feb 2023

References

  • Abbas, S. A., A. Aslam, A. U. Rehman, W. A. Abbasi, S. Arif, and S. Z. H. Kazmi. 2020. K-means and K-medoids: Cluster analysis on birth data collected in City Muzaffarabad, Kashmir. IEEE Access 8:151847–697. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014021.
  • Abbas, S. A., A. U. Rehman, F. Majeed, A. Majid, M. S. A. Malik, Z. H. Kazmi, and S. Zafar. 2020. Performance analysis of classification algorithms on birth dataset. IEEE Access 8:102146–54. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999899.
  • Abbas, S. A., R. Riaz, S. Z. H. Kazmi, S. S. Rizvi, and S. J. Kwon. 2018. Cause analysis of caesarian sections and application of machine learning methods for classification of birth data. IEEE Access 6:67555–61. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879115.
  • Amin, M., and A. Ali. 2018. Performance evaluation of supervised machine learning classifiers for predicting healthcare operational decisions. In Wavy AI research foundation: Lahore, Pakistan 90.
  • Fergus, P., P. Cheung, A. Hussain, D. Al-Jumeily, C. Dobbins, and S. Iram. 2013. Prediction of preterm deliveries from EHG signals using machine learning. Plos One 8 (10):e77154. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077154.
  • Fergus, P., M. Selvaraj, and C. Chalmers. 2018. Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces. Computers in Biology and Medicine 93:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.12.002.
  • Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio, and A. Courville. 2016. Machine learning basics. Deep Learning 1:98–164.
  • Gregory, K. D., S. Jackson, L. Korst, and M. Fridman. 2012. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: Whose risks? Whose benefits? American Journal of Perinatology 29 (01):07–18. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1285829.
  • Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. Overview of supervised learning. In The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction, 9–41.
  • An Introduction to Machine Learning. (n.d.). DigitalOcean. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/an-introduction-to-machine-learning
  • James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning, vol. 112, 18. New York: Springer.
  • Lumbiganon, P., M. Laopaiboon, A. M. Gülmezoglu, J. P. Souza, S. Taneepanichskul, P. Ruyan, D. E. Attygalle, N. Shrestha, R. Mori, and N. D. Hinh. 2010. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. The Lancet 375 (9713):490–99. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5.
  • Menai, M. E. B., F. J. Mohder, and F. Al-Mutairi. 2013. Influence of feature selection on naïve Bayes classifier for recognizing patterns in cardiotocograms. Journal of Medical and Bioengineering 2 (1):66–70. doi:10.12720/jomb.2.1.66-70.
  • Milovic, B., and M. Milovic. 2012. Prediction and decision making in health care using data mining. International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) 1 (2):69–78. doi:10.11591/ijphs.v1i2.1380.
  • Molina, G., T. G. Weiser, S. R. Lipsitz, M. M. Esquivel, T. Uribe-Leitz, T. Azad, N. Shah, K. Semrau, W. R. Berry, and A. A. Gawande. 2015. Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. Jama 314 (21):2263–70. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
  • Pasche Guignard, F. 2015. A gendered bun in the oven. The gender-reveal party as a new ritualization during pregnancy. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 44 (4):479–500. doi:10.1177/0008429815599802.