Event Log Privacy Based on Differential Petri Nets

References

• Adriansyah, A., J. Munoz-Gama, J. Carmona, B. F. van Dongen, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2015. Measuring precision of modeled behavior. Information Systems and E-Business Management 13 (1):37–842. doi:10.1007/s10257-014-0234-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriansyah, A., B. F. van Dongen, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2011. Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 55–64. doi:10.1109/EDOC.2011.12
   Google Scholar
• Augusto, A., R. Conforti, M. Dumas, M. L. Rosa, F. M. Maggi, A. Marrella, M. Mecella, and A. Soo. 2019. Automated discovery of process models from event logs: Review and benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31 (4):686–705. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2018.2841877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista, E., and A. Solanas. 2021. A uniformization-based approach to preserve individuals’ privacy during process mining analyses. Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications 14 (3):14. doi:10.1007/s12083-020-01059-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwork, C. 2008. Differential privacy: A survey of results. In Theory and applications of models of computation, ed. M. Agrawal, D. Du, Z. Duan, and A. Li, 1–19. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkoumy, G., S. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, M. Dumas, P. Laud, A. Pankova, and M. Weidlich. 2022. Shareprom: A tool for privacy-preserving inter-organizational process mining, August 5.
   Google Scholar
• Elkoumy, G., S. A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, M. F. Sani, A. Koschmider, F. Mannhardt, S. N. Von Voigt, M. Rafiei, and L. V. Waldthausen. 2021. Privacy and confidentiality in process mining: Threats and research challenges. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 13 (1):1–11. doi:10.1145/3468877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkoumy, G., A. Pankova, and M. Dumas. 2021. Mine me but don’t single me out: Differentially private event logs for process mining. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM), 80–87. doi:10.1109/ICPM53251.2021.9576852
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog-Petersen, S. 2019. Providing privacy guarantees in process mining, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog-Petersen, S. A., H. van der Aa, and M. Weidlich. 2019. PRETSA: Event log sanitization for privacy-aware process discovery. In 2019 International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM), 1–8. doi:10.1109/ICPM.2019.00012
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog-Petersen, S. A., H. van der Aa, and M. Weidlich. 2020. PRIPEL: Privacy-preserving event log publishing including contextual information. In Business Process Management, ed. D. Fahland, C. Ghidini, J. Becker, and M. Dumas, 111–28. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, P., H. Zhu, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, and Q. Zheng. 2018. Differential privacy protection recommendation algorithm based on student learning behavior. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on E-Business Engineering (ICEBE), 285–88. doi:10.1109/ICEBE.2018.00054
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., X. Xia, H. Li, J. Cui, and A. Mardani. 2022. Fuzzy differential privacy theory and its applications in subgraph counting. In IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1–1. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3157385
   Google Scholar
• Kabierski, M., S. A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, and M. Weidlich. 2021. Privacy-aware process performance indicators: Framework and release mechanisms. In Advanced information systems engineering, ed. M. L. Rosa, S. Sadiq, and E. Teniente, 19–36. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leemans, S. J. J., D. Fahland, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2013. Discovering block-structured process models from event logs—A constructive approach. In Application and theory of petri nets and concurrency, ed. J.-M. Colom and J. Desel, 311–29. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. 2022. Formal modeling and discovery of multi-instance business processes: A cloud resource management case study. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 9 (12):2151–60. doi:10.1109/JAS.2022.106109.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., L. Cheng, Q. Zeng, and L. Wen. 2022. Formal modeling and discovery of hierarchical business processes: A petri net-based approach. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 1–12. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2022.3195869
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., H. Li, S. Zhang, L. Cheng, and Q. Zeng. 2022. Cross-department collaborative healthcare process model discovery from event logs. In IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 1–11. doi:10.1109/TASE.2022.3194312
   Google Scholar
• Mannhardt, F., A. Koschmider, N. Baracaldo, M. Weidlich, and J. Michael. 2019. Privacy-preserving process mining: Differential privacy for event logs. Business & Information Systems Engineering 61 (5):595–614. doi:10.1007/s12599-019-00613-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannhardt, F., S. A. Petersen, and M. F. Oliveira. 2018. Privacy challenges for process mining in human-centered industrial environments. In 2018 14th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), 64–71. doi:10.1109/IE.2018.00017
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez von Voigt, S., S. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, D. Janssen, A. Koschmider, F. Tschorsch, F. Mannhardt, O. Landsiedel, and M. Weidlich. 2020. Quantifying the re-identification risk of event logs for process mining: empirical evaluation paper, 252–67). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Pika, A., M. T. Wynn, S. Budiono, A. H. M. Ter Hofstede, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and H. A. Reijers. 2020. Privacy-preserving process mining in healthcare. Intern-ational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (5):1612, Article 5. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiei, M., L. von Waldthausen, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2020. Supporting confidentiality in process mining using abstraction and encryption. In Data-driven process discovery and analysis, ed. P. Ceravolo, M. van Keulen, and M. T. Gómez-López, 101–23. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46633-6_6.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiei, M., M. Wagner, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2020. TLKC-privacy model for process mining. In Research challenges in information science, ed. F. Dalpiaz, J. Zdravkovic, and P. Loucopoulos, 398–416. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rösel, F., S. Fahrenkog-Petersen, H. van der Aa, and M. Weidlich. 2022. A distance measure for privacy-preserving process mining based on feature learning 73–85. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_6.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanini, A., D. Aloini, E. Benevento, R. Dulmin, and V. Mininno. 2018. Performance analysis in emergency departments: A data-driven approach. Measuring Business Excellence 22 (2):130–45. doi:10.1108/MBE-07-2017-0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, L. 2002. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10 (5):557–70. doi:10.1142/S0218488502001648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. 2012. Process mining: Overview and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 3 (2):1–17. doi:10.1145/2229156.2229157.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. 2016. Data science in action. In Process mining: Data science in action, 3–23. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W., T. Weijters, and L. Maruster. 2004. Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16 (9):1128–42. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2004.47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, W. G. 2016. European union data privacy law reform: General data protection regulation, privacy shield, and the right to delisting. The Business Lawyer 72 (1):221–34.
   Google Scholar
• Weidlich, M., A. Polyvyanyy, N. Desai, and J. Mendling. 2010. Process compliance measurement based on behavioural profiles. In Advanced information systems engineering, ed. B. Pernici, 499–514. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_38.
   Google Scholar