Development of Large-Scale Farming Based on Explainable Machine Learning for a Sustainable Rural Economy: The Case of Cyber Risk Analysis to Prevent Costly Data Breaches

References

• Ahmadlou, M., and H. Adeli. 2010. Enhanced probabilistic neural network with local decision circles: A robust classifier. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 17 (3):197–2165. doi:10.3233/ICA-2010-0345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinwumi, D. A., G. B. Iwasokun, B. K. Alese, and S. A. Oluwadare. 2017. A review of game theory approach to cyber security risk management. Nigerian Journal of Technology 36 (4):1271–85. doi:10.4314/njt.v36i4.38.
   Google Scholar
• AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SeBGIS. 2006. Montpellier, France October 29-November 3, 2006. Proceedings, Part II.
   Google Scholar
• Basallo, Y. A., V. Estrada Senti, and N. Martinez Sanchez. 2018. Artificial intelligence techniques for information security risk assessment. IEEE Latin America Transactions 16 (3):897–901. doi:10.1109/TLA.2018.8358671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, A., and W. Ul Hassan. 2019. Can data provenance put an end to the data breach? IEEE Security & Privacy 17 (4):88–93. doi:10.1109/MSEC.2019.2913693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhoyar, D. G., and U. Yadav. 2017. Review of jamming attack using game theory. Paper read at 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), Coimbatore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T.-S., and W. Bo-Han 2018. Gateway selection based on game theory in internet of things. Paper read at 2018 International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET), Chengdu, China.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, H. N., J. Sheng Teh, and A. Herbland. 2021. Identifying the effect of data breach publicity on information security awareness using hierarchical regression. IEEE Access 9 (9):121759–70. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3107426.
   Google Scholar
• Do, C. T., H. Nguyen, C. H. Tran, A. K. Charles, K. A. Kwiat, E. Blasch, S. Ren, N. Pissinou, and S. Sitharama Iyengar. 2017. Game theory for cyber security and privacy. ACM Computing Surveys 50 (2):1–37. doi:10.1145/3057268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., W. Wang, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, P. Wang, and S. Shuxun Wang. 2018. On cyber risk management of blockchain networks: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 14 (5):1492–504. doi:10.1109/TSC.2018.2876846.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh, Z., R. Biddle, and S. Marsen. 2021. User perception of data breaches. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 64 (4):374–89. doi:10.1109/TPC.2021.3110545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, D., T. Driessen, and H. Sun. 2015. The Shapley value and the nucleolus of service cost savings games as an application of 1-convexity. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 80 (6):1799–807. doi:10.1093/imamat/hxv017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. C. 2017. Data breaches: Public sector perspectives. IT Professional 20 (4):57–64. doi:10.1109/MITP.2017.265105441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagazio, M., N. Sherif, and M. Cushman. 2014. A multi-level approach to understanding the impact of cyber crime on the financial sector. Computers & Security 45 (45):58–74. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Laube, S., and R. Böhme. 2017. Strategic aspects of cyber risk information sharing. ACM Computing Surveys 50 (5):1–36. doi:10.1145/3124398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Q. Taiyue, Z. Jin, S. Qin, P. Chen, and Y. Liu. 2020. Risk assessment system based on fuzzy composite evaluation and a backpropagation neural network for a shield tunnel crossing under a river. Advances in Civil Engineering 2020 (2020):1–14. doi:10.1155/2020/8840200.
   Google Scholar
• McCord, M., P. Davis, J. McCord, M. Haran, and K. Davison. 2020. An exploratory investigation into the relationship between energy performance certificates and sales price: A polytomous universal model approach. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 25 (2):247–71. doi:10.1108/JFMPC-08-2019-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednikov, M. D., N. A. Sokolitsyna, A. S. Sokolitsyn, and V. P. Semenov. 2017. Game theory model of forming enterprise development strategy in market environment uncertainty. Paper read at 2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), St. Petersburg, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Y., C. Chen, L. Pan, Q.-L. Han, J. Zhang, and Y. Xiang. 2021. Machine learning–based cyber attacks targeting on controlled information: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 54 (7):1–36. doi:10.1145/3465171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musman, S., and A. Turner. 2018. A game theoretic approach to cyber security risk management. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 15 (2):127–46. doi:10.1177/1548512917699724.
   Google Scholar
• Myklebust, J. O., and F. Ove Båtevik. 2022. Special needs provision and economic independence among young adults with disabilities: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Special Needs Education 37 (5):715–28. doi:10.1080/08856257.2021.1974552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panou, A., C. Ntantogian, and C. Xenakis. 2017. RiSKi: A framework for modeling cyber threats to estimate risk for data breach insurance. Paper read at Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Larissa Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Piprani, B. 2006. Using orm-based models as a foundation for a data quality firewall in an advanced generation data warehouse. Paper read at On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops: OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters
   Google Scholar
• Refsdal, A., B. Solhaug and K. Stølen. 2015. Cybersecurity. Cyber-Risk Management 4: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, C., and S. Pape. 2020. LiSRA: Lightweight security risk assessment for decision support in information security. Computers & Security 90 (90):101656. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.101656.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. 2019. EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A comparative analysis of the approach of the EU and APEC to cross border data transfers and protection of personal data in the IoT era. Computer Law & Security Review 35 (4):380–97. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telang, R. 2015. Policy framework for data breaches. IEEE Security & Privacy 13 (1):77–79. doi:10.1109/MSP.2015.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teymourlouei, H., and V. E. Harris. 2018. Organization risk management on network vulnerability and potential data breach. Paper read at 2018 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Torra, V., and V. Torra. 2017. Privacy models and disclosure risk measures. Data Privacy: Foundations, New Developments and the Big Data Challenge 28: 111–89.
   Google Scholar
• Varshney, S., D. Munjal, O. Bhattacharya, S. Saboo, and N. Aggarwal. 2020. Big data privacy breach prevention strategies. Paper read at 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC), Gunupur Odisha, India.
   Google Scholar
• Xenya, M. C., and K. Quist-Aphetsi. 2019. Decentralized distributed blockchain ledger for financial transaction backup data. Paper read at 2019 International Conference on Cyber Security and Internet of Things (ICSIoT), Accra, Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhe, X., Y. Wang, J. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2008. Analysis on the achievement milestones and limitations of Game Theory. Paper read at 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Yantai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Yun-Jie, J., C. Wen-Qi, and H. Ling. 2018. Risk identification and simulation based on the bayesian inference. Paper read at 2018 4th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC), Wuhan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zhiru, L., X. Wei, H. Shi, Y. Zhang, Y. Yan, and D. Gong. 2021. Security and privacy risk assessment of energy big data in cloud environment. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2021 (2021):1–11. doi:10.1155/2021/2398460.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., S. Danino, K. Sun, and F. Schaub. 2019. YouMight’Be affected: An empirical analysis of readability and usability issues in data breach notifications. Paper read at Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow Scotland Uk.
   Google Scholar