3,622
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Learning Methods for Enhancing Art and Design Education in Higher Institutions

&
Article: 2225907 | Received 03 Mar 2023, Accepted 05 May 2023, Published online: 19 Jun 2023

References

  • Amiri, F. 2011. Programming as design: The role of programming in interactive media curriculum in art and design [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 30 (2):200–2230. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01680.x.
  • Budge, K. 2016a. Learning tobe: The modelling modeling design practice in university art and design teaching [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 35 (2):243–58. doi:10.1111/jade.12060.
  • Budge, K. 2016b. Teaching art and design: communicating creative practice through embodied and tacit knowledge [J]. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 15 (3–4):432–45. doi:10.1177/1474022215592247.
  • Danvers, J. 2003. Towards a radical pedagogy: provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 22 (1):47–57. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00338.
  • Giorgdze, M., and M. Dgebuadze. 2017. Interactive teaching methods: Challenges and perspectives [J]. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education 3 (9):544–48. doi:10.18768/ijaedu.370419.
  • Hall, J. 2010. Making art, teaching art, learning art: Exploring the concept of the artist teacher [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 29 (2):103–10. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01636.x.
  • Kennewell, S., H. Tanner, S. Jones, and G. Beauchamp. 2008. Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching [J]. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 24 (1):61–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x.
  • Mason, R., and J. Steers. 2006. The impact of formal assessment procedures on teaching and learning in art and design in secondary schools [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 25 (2):119–33. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00477.x.
  • Meguid, E. A., and M. Collins. 2017. Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: Traditional versus interactive teaching [J]. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 8:229. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S131851.
  • Murray, R., and J. R. Brightman. 1996. Interactive teaching [J]. European Journal of Engineering Education 21 (3):295–308. doi:10.1080/03043799608923415.
  • Ridley, R. T. 2007. Interactive teaching: A concept analysis [J]. The Journal of Nursing Education 46 (5):203.
  • Sawyer, R. K. 2017. Teaching creativity in art and design studio classes: A systematic literature review [J]. Educational Review 22:99–113. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.002.
  • Sawyer, R. K. 2018. Teaching and learning how to create in art and design schools [J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 (1):137–81. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1381963.
  • Senthamarai, S. 2018. Interactive teaching strategies [J]. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research 3 (1):36–38. doi:10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.166.
  • Shreeve, A., E. Sims, and P. Trowler. 2010. A kind of exchange’: Learning from art and design teaching [J]. Higher Education Research & Development 29 (2):125–38. doi:10.1080/07294360903384269.
  • Tuma, F. 2021. The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures [J]. Annals of Medicine & Surgery 62:231–35. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.051.
  • Wood, J. 2004. Open minds and a sense of adventure: How teachers of art & design approach technology [J]. International Journal of Art & Design Education 23 (2):179–91. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2004.00396.x.
  • Xhemajli, A. 2016. The role of the teacher in interactive teaching [J]. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education 4 (1):31. doi:10.5937/IJCRSEE1601031X.
  • Yakovleva, N. O., and E. V. Yakovlev. 2014. Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education [J]. Pacific Science Review 16 (2):75–80. doi:10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016.