Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model

References

• Adamopoulou, E., and L. Moussiades. 2020. Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications 2:100006 %U. doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006.
   Google Scholar
• Afthanorhan, W. 2013. A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (pls-sem) and covariance based structural equation modeling (cb-sem) for confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology 2 (5):198–24.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., and M. Wadhwa. 2020. Review of state-of-the-art design techniques for chatbots. SN Computer Science 1 (5 %U). doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00255-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ain, N., K. Kaur, and M. Waheed. 2016. The influence of learning value on learning management system use. Information Development 32 (5):1306–21. doi:10.1177/0266666915597546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alotumi, M. 2022. Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to use google classroom: Case study-mixed methods research. Education and Information Technologies 27 (7):10035–63. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri, A., R. Khajouei, A. Ameri, and Y. Jahani. 2020. Acceptance of a mobile-based educational application (LabSafety) by pharmacy students: An application of the UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies 25 (1):419–35. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09965-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulou, A., N. Karacapilidis, E. Loukis, and Y. Charalabidis. 2019. Transforming the communication between citizens and government through ai-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly 36 (2):358–67. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain, A. A., Z. Hussain, W. H. Rizvi, and M. S. Vighio. 2019. Extending utaut2 toward acceptance of mobile learning in the context of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society 18 (3):659–73. doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00685-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi, S. M., N. Roozbahani, and A. Khatony. 2020. Factors affecting the acceptance of blended learning in medical education: Application of utaut2 model. BMC Medical Education 20 (1):367–67. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02302-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1 (3):185–216 %U 10.1177/135910457000100301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhalis, D., and E. S. Y. Cheng. 2019. Exploring the use of chatbots in hotels: Technology providers’ perspective. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2020, 231–42. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Camilleri, M. A., and C. Troise. 2023. Live support by chatbots with artificial intelligence: A future research agenda. Service Business 17 (1):61–80. doi:10.1007/s11628-022-00513-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casillo, M., F. Colace, L. Fabbri, M. Lombardi, A. Romano, and D. Santaniello. 2020. Chatbot in industry 4.0: An approach for training new employees. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 371-76. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez Herting, D., R. Cladellas Pros, and A. Castelló Tarrida. 2020. Habit and social influence as determinants of PowerPoint use in higher education: A study from a technology acceptance approach. Interactive Learning Environments 31 (1):497–513. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1799021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E., P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway. 2023. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 61 (2):228–39. doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J., M. Cowling, and K.-A. Allen. 2023. Leadership is needed for ethical chatgpt: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (ai). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 20 (3). doi:10.53761/1.20.3.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dajani, D., and A. S. Abu Hegleh. 2019. Behavior intention of animation usage among university students. Heliyon 5 (10):e02536–36. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3):319. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., M. Sarstedt, C. Fuchs, P. Wilczynski, and S. Kaiser. 2012. Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (3):434–49. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edumadze, J. K. E., K. A. Barfi, V. Arkorful, and N. O. Baffour Jnr. 2022. Undergraduate student’s perception of using video conferencing tools under lockdown amidst COVID-19 pandemic in ghana. Interactive Learning Environments 31 (9):5799–810. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.2018618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsan, U., Q. V. Liao, M. Muller, M. O. Riedl, and J. D. Weisz. 2021. Expanding explainability: Towards social transparency in ai systems. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama Japan, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• El-Masri, M., and A. Tarhini. 2017. Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (utaut2). Educational Technology Research & Development 65 (3):743–63. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faqih, K. M. S., and M.-I. R. M. Jaradat. 2021. Integrating ttf and utaut2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education: Perspective from a developing country. Technology in Society 67:101787. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, M. S., M. Salam, N. Jaafar, A. Fayolle, K. Ayupp, M. Radovic-Markovic, and A. Sajid. 2017. Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (lcs) in executive business studies. Interactive Technology & Smart Education 14 (4):329–48. doi:10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, A., C. W. Safranek, T. Huang, V. Socrates, L. Chi, R. A. Taylor, and D. Chartash. 2023. How does chatgpt perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education 9:e45312–12. doi:10.2196/45312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González-González, C. S., V. Muñoz-Cruz, P. A. Toledo-Delgado, and E. Nacimiento-García. 2023. Personalized gamification for learning: A reactive chatbot architecture proposal. Sensors 23 (1):545. doi:10.3390/s23010545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini, S. 2023a. Development and validation of the ai attitude scale (aias-4): A brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology 14:14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini, S. 2023b. Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of ai and chatgpt in educational settings. Education Sciences 13 (7):692. doi:10.3390/educsci13070692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini, S., and M. Koivisto. 2024. Artificial creativity? Evaluating AI against human performance in creative interpretation of visual stimuli. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, G., B. Ehrler, and Ai. 2023. Machines are about to change scientific publishing forever. ACS Energy Letters 8 (1):878–80 %U doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzik, E. E., C. Byrge, and C. Gilde. 2023. The originality of machines: Ai takes the Torrance test. Journal of Creativity 33 (3):100065. doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100065.
   Google Scholar
• Hair Jr, J. F. M. C. Howard, and C. Nitzl. 2020. Assessing measurement model quality in pls-sem using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research 109:101–10. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning 46 (1–2):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. Pls-sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 19 (2):139–52 %U doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1):115–35 %U 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoi, V. N. 2020. Understanding higher education learners’ acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education 146:103761. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., K. Laxman, and K. Lee. 2020. Exploring factors affecting academics’ adoption of emerging mobile technologies-an extended utaut perspective. Education and Information Technologies 25 (5):4615–35. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakkaew, P., and S. Hemrungrote. 2017. The use of utaut2 model for understanding student perceptions using google classroom: A case study of introduction to information technology course. Paper presentat at the 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Chiang Mai, Thailand, Media and Technology (ICDAMT).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M., B. Y. T. Liew, H. Lim, J. Jang, and S. Lee. 2014. Investigating the determinants of mobile learning acceptance in korea using utaut2. Emerging Issues in Smart Learning, 209–16. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_29.
   Google Scholar
• Kasthuri, E., and S. Balaji. 2021. A chatbot for changing lifestyle in education. 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV), IEEE %U. doi:10.1109/icicv50876.2021.9388633.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., S. Uslu, K. J. Rittichier, and A. Durresi. 2022. Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55 (2):1–38. doi:10.1145/3491209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadija, A., F. F. Zahra, and A. Naceur. 2021. Ai-powered health chatbots: Toward a general architecture. Procedia Computer Science 191:355–60. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.048.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W., Y. Ryoo, S. Lee, and J. A. Lee. 2023. Chatbot advertising as a double-edged sword: The roles of regulatory focus and privacy concerns. Journal of Advertising 52 (4):504–22. doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2043795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, J., A. Androniceanu, and I. Georgescu. 2019. Digitalization of EU Countries: A clusterwise analysis. Proceedings of the 13rd International Management Conference: Management Strategies for High Performance, Bucharest, Romania, October, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. 2018. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: An application in tourism and hospitality research. In Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research, ed. F. Ali, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, and C. Cobanoglu, 1–16. Leeds, England: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto, M., and S. Grassini. 2023. Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task. Scientific Reports 13 (1):13601. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, C., A. Gupta, A. Gupta, and G. Singh. 2022. Impact of artificial intelligence-based chatbots on customer engagement and business growth. In Deep learning for social media data analytics, 195–210. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J. A., and B. Bervell. 2019. Google classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies 24 (2):1793–817. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A., and O. Sahlgren. 2021. Ai systems and respect for human autonomy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 %U doi:10.3389/frai.2021.705164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Limayem, H., and Cheung. 2007. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly 31 (4):705. doi:10.2307/25148817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W. M., A. Gunasekara, J. L. Pallant, J. I. Pallant, and E. Pechenkina. 2023. Generative ai and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education 21 (2):100790. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, B. D., and T. Wang. 2023. Chatting about chatgpt: How may ai and gpt impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News 40 (3):26–29. doi:10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, B., R. Y. K. Lau, C. Li, and Y. W. Si. 2021. A critical review of state‐of‐the‐art chatbot designs and applications. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 12 (1). doi:10.1002/widm.1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., N. P. Morris, B. Swinnerton, and M. Homer. 2019. The influence of values on e-learning adoption. Computers & Education 141:103617. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, D., and K. Shilpa. 2023. “Chatting with chatgpt”: Analyzing the factors influencing users’ intention to use the open ai’s chatgpt using the utaut model. Heliyon 9 (11):e20962 %U doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møgelvang, A., K. Ludvigsen, C. Bjelland, and O. M. Schei. 2023. Hvl-studenters bruk og oppfatninger av ki-chatboter i utdanning. HVL-Rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., and I. Benbasat. 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (3):192–222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriuchi, E., V. M. Landers, D. Colton, and N. Hair. 2021. Engagement with chatbots versus augmented reality interactive technology in e-commerce. Journal of Strategic Marketing 29 (5):375–89. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2020.1740766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou, K., V. Gialamas, and K. Lavidas. 2020. Acceptance of mobile phone by university students for their studies: An investigation applying utaut2 model. Education and Information Technologies 25 (5):4139–55 %U doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10157-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda, T., and S. Shoda. 2018. Ai-based chatbot service for financial industry. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal 54 (2):4–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei, H. V., K. O. Kwateng, and K. A. Boateng. 2022. Integration of personality trait, motivation and utaut 2 to understand e-learning adoption in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies 27 (8):10705–30. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11047-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraschiv, A. M., N. A. Panie, T. M. Nae, and L. Ciobanu. 2021. EU Countries’ Performance in Digitalization. International Conference on Business Excellence, 11–24, Cham: Springer International Publishing, March.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M. 2023. Academic integrity considerations of ai large language models in the post-pandemic era: Chatgpt and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 20 (2). doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, A., and Y. Don. 2013. Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the utaut2 model. International Education Studies 6 (7 %U doi:10.5539/ies.v6n7p157.
   Google Scholar
• Raza, S. A., Z. Qazi, W. Qazi, and M. Ahmed. 2021. E-learning in higher education during covid-19: Evidence from blackboard learning system. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 14 (4):1603–22. doi:10.1108/JARHE-02-2021-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdar, N. M., J. D. Banja, and C. C. Meltzer. 2020. Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence. In European Journal of Radiology, vol. 122, 108768. %U. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.68.
   Google Scholar
• Samsudeen, S. N., and R. Mohamed. 2019. University students’ intention to use e-learning systems: A study of higher educational institutions in Sri Lanka. Interactive Technology & Smart Education 16 (3):219–38. doi:10.1108/ITSE-11-2018-0092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair. 2021. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Market Research, 587–632. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schelble, B. G., J. Lopez, C. Textor, R. Zhang, N. J. Mcneese, R. Pak, and G. Freeman. 2022. Towards ethical ai: Empirically investigating dimensions of ai ethics, trust repair, and performance in human-ai teaming. Human Factors 66 (4):1037–55. doi:10.1177/00187208221116952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strzelecki, A. 2023. To use or not to use chatgpt in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments 1–14. doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881.
   Google Scholar
• Suhel, S. F., V. K. Shukla, S. Vyas, and V. P. Mishra. 2020. Conversation to automation in banking through chatbot using artificial machine intelligence language. 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO), 611-18: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Svenningsson, N., and M. Faraon. 2019. Artificial intelligence in conversational agents: A study of factors related to perceived humanness in chatbots. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, ACM %U. doi:10.1145/3375959.3375973.
   Google Scholar
• Tamilmani, K., N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2018. Use of ‘habit’ is not a habit in understanding individual technology adoption: A review of utaut2 based empirical studies. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 277–94 %@ 978-3-030-04315-5. %U Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15-5_19.
   Google Scholar
• Tamilmani, K., N. P. Rana, N. Prakasam, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2019. The battle of brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in utaut2. International Journal of Information Management 46:222–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamilmani, K., N. P. Rana, S. F. Wamba, and R. Dwivedi. 2021. The extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (utaut2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management 57:102269 %U doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and P. A. Todd. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (2):144–76. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twum, K. K., D. Ofori, G. Keney, and B. Korang-Yeboah. 2021. Using the utaut, personal innovativeness and perceived financial cost to examine student’s intention to use e-learning. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 13 (3):713–37. doi:10.1108/JSTPM-12-2020-0168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 (4):695. doi:10.2307/25148660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dis, E. A. M., J. Bollen, W. Zuidema, R. Van Rooij, and C. L. Bockting. 2023. Chatgpt: Five priorities for research. Nature 614 (7947):224–26. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, T., and Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36 (1):157 %U. doi:10.2307/41410412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3):425. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., J. Thong, and X. Xu. 2016. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 17 (5):328–76. doi:10.17705/1jais.00428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K.-T., T. Teo, and P. S. C. Goh. 2013. Understanding the intention to use interactive whiteboards: Model development and testing. Interactive Learning Environments 23 (6):731–47. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.806932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, A., Z. Liu, Y. Guo, V. Sinha, and R. Akkiraju. 2017. A new chatbot for customer service on social media. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM %U. doi:10.1145/3025453.3025496.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C.-W., C.-M. Chao, C.-F. Chang, R.-J. Chen, P.-C. Chen, and Y.-X. Liu. 2021. Exploring behavioral intention to use a mobile health education website: An extension of the utaut 2 model. Sage Open 11 (4):215824402110557. doi:10.1177/21582440211055721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharis, G., and K. Nikolopoulou. 2022. Factors predicting university students’ behavioral intention to use elearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: An utaut2 approach with ‘learning value’. Education and Information Technologies 27 (9):12065–82. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, N., Y. Liu, P. Gong, M. Hertogh, and M. König. 2021. Do right pls and do pls right: A critical review of the application of pls-sem in construction management research. Frontiers of Engineering Management 8 (3):356–69 %U doi:10.1007/s42524-021-0153-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwain, A. A. A. 2019. Technological innovativeness and information quality as neoteric predictors of users’ acceptance of learning management system. Interactive Technology & Smart Education 16 (3):239–54. doi:10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar