Building Scholarly Writers: Student Perspectives on Peer Review in a Doctoral Writing Seminar

REFERENCES

• Badger, K. (2010). Peer teaching and review: A model for writing development and knowledge synthesis. Social Work Education,29, 6–17. doi:10.1080/02615470902810850
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, W. L. (2009). Reflections on ten years of teaching writing for publication to graduate students and junior faculty. Journal of Scholarly Publishing,40, 184–200. doi:10.3138/jsp.40.2.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, K., & Windsor, L. C. (2010). The four Ps of publishing: Demystifying publishing in peer-reviewed journals for social work doctoral students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,30, 147–158. doi:10.1080/08841231003697999
   Google Scholar
• Bibus, A., Link, R., Rooney, R., Strom-Gottfried, K., & Sullivan, M. (1999). The writer’s group. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services,80, 531–534. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1989). Procrastination, busyness, and bingeing. Behaviour Research and Therapy,27, 605–611. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(89)90144-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdge, B. (2007). Bending gender, ending gender: Theoretical foundations for social work practice with the transgender community. Social Work,52, 243–250. doi:10.1093/sw/52.3.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M., & Folaron, G. (2005). Accessibility and clarity of state child welfare mission statements. Child Welfare,84, 415–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education,25, 39–52. doi:10.1080/030750700116000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, K. L. (2007). Peer response in the composition classroom: An alternative genealogy. Rhetoric Review,26, 303–319. doi:10.1080/07350190701419863
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Wang, C., & Wu, W. (2007). Examining the effects of two combined peer and teacher feedback models on college students’ writing quality. International Journal of the Humanities,5(5), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication,23, 260–294. doi:10.1177/0741088306289261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covill, A. E. (2010). Comparing peer review and self-review as ways to improve college students’ writing. Journal of Literacy Research,42, 199–226. doi:10.1080/10862961003796207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deka, A. (2007). Conceptualizing gender equity in the Indian health care system. Perspectives on Social Work,6, 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dolejs, A., & Grant, D. (2000). Deep breaths on paper: Teaching writing in the social work classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,20(3–4), 19–40. doi:10.1300/J067v20n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. In M. D. Sorcinelli & P. Elbow (Eds.), Writing to learn: Strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 5–13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. (2008). Using peer-review effectively in large, diverse classes. International Journal of the Humanities,5(11), 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M. (1994). Scholarship and research in social work: Emerging challenges. Journal of Social Work Education,30, 252–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, R., & Kinn, J. T. (2011). Practical tips for publishing scholarly articles: Writing and publishing in the helping professions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Lyceum.
   Google Scholar
• Gopen, G. (2004). Expectations: Teaching writing from the reader’s expectations. New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. G., Baskind, F. R., Best, A. M., & Boyd, A. S. (1997). Getting beyond the productivity gap: Assessing variation in social work scholarship. Journal of Social Work Education,33, 541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication,18, 549–574. doi:10.1177/0741088301018004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamott, A. (1995). Bird by bird: Some instructions on writing and life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. (2007). No-harm contracts: A review of what we know. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior,37, 50–57. doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.1.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liechty, J. M., Liao, M., & Schull, C. P. (2009). Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoral students in social work. Journal of Social Work Education,45, 481–497. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200800091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page-Adams, D., Cheng, L., Gogineni, A., & Shen, C. (1995). Establishing a group to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students. Journal of Social Work Education,31, 402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiele, J. H., & Wilson, R. G. (2001). Issues and guidelines for promoting diversity in doctoral social work education. Arete,25, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, S. L., Smith, T., Mathiesen, S. G., & Perry, R. (2006). Perceptions of professional social work journals: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education,42, 139–160. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2006.200303095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, K., Upton-Davis, K., & Johnson, C. (2009). A writer’s circle: Spiraling into print. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services,90, 1–4. doi:10.1606/1945-1350.3864
   Google Scholar
• Waller, M. (2000). Addressing student writing problems: Applying composition theory to social work education. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work,5, 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. (2011). Exploring the effectiveness of using peer evaluation and teacher feedback in college students’ writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,20, 144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuehchiu, F. (2007). The effects of peer reviews in EFL college composition classes: From learners’ perspectives. International Journal of the Humanities,5, 137–142.
   Google Scholar