810
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

“Social Work Is a Profession, Not an Ideology”: A Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions of Social Justice Discussions in the Classroom

, , &

References

  • Bisman, C. (2004). Social work values: The moral code of the profession. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 109–123. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch008
  • Charmaz, K. (2008a). Constructionsim and the grounded theory. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Charmaz, K. (2008b). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–172). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=81660
  • Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De Saxe Zerden, L., O’Quinn, E., & Davis, C. (2015). Evidence-based policy versus morality policy: The case of syringe access programs. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 12(4), 425–437. doi:10.1080/15433714.2013.873751
  • Dessel, A. B., & Bolen, R. M. (2014). Conservative Christian beliefs and sexual orientation in social work: Privilege, oppression and the pursuit of human rights. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press.
  • Ely, G., Flaherty, C., Akers, L., & Bonistall, N. (2012). Social work student attitudes towards the social work perspective on abortion. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 9(2), 34–45.
  • Flaherty, C., Ely, G., Meyer-Adams, N., Baer, J., & Sutphen, R. (2013). Are social work educators bullies? Student perceptions of political discourse in the social work classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 59–74. doi:10.1080/08841233.2012.750259
  • Fortune, A. E., Lee, A., & Cavazos, A. (2005). Achievement motivation and outcome in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 115–129. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300318
  • Fram, M. S., & Miller-Cribbs, J. (2008). Liberal and conservative in social work education: Exploring student experiences. Social Work Education, 27(8), 883–897. doi:10.1080/02615470701844266
  • Funge, S. P. (2011). Promoting the social justice orientation of students: The role of the educator. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 73–90. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900035
  • Hess, J. Z., Rynczack, D., Minarik, J. D., & Landrum-Brown, J. (2010). Alternative settings for liberal-conservative exchange: Examining an undergraduate dialogue course. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 156–166.
  • Hodge, D. R. (2003). Value differences between social workers and members of the working and middle classes. Social Work, 48(1), 107–119. doi:10.1093/sw/48.1.107
  • Hodge, D. R. (2006). Moving towards a more inclusive educational environment? A multi-sample exploration of religious discrimination as seen through the eyes of students from various faith traditions. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 249–267. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2006.200400455
  • Hodge, D. R. (2007a). Exploring the state of religious diversity in social work education. Advances in Social Work, 7(1), 90–107.
  • Hodge, D. R. (2007b). Social justice and people of faith: A transnational perspective. Social Work, 52, 139–148. doi:10.1093/sw/52.2.139
  • Hodge, D. R., Wolfer, T. A., Limb, G. E., & Nadir, A. (2009). Expanding diversity in social work discourse: Exploring the possibility of a theistic perspective. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 28, 202–214. doi:10.1080/15426430802644255
  • Holley, L. C., & Steiner, S. (2005). Safe space: Students perspectives on classroom environment. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 49–64. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300343
  • Hyde, C. A., & Ruth, B. J. (2002). Multicultural content and class participation: Do students self-censor? Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 241–256.
  • Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. The BMJ, 337(a567). doi:10.1136/bmj.39602.690162.47
  • Meichenbaum, D. (2007). Proceedings from May conference: Self-care for trauma psychotherapists and Caregivers: Individual, social and organizational interventions. Retrieved from http://www.melissainstitute.org/documents/meichenbaum_selfcare_11thconf.pdf
  • Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–10.
  • National Association of Scholars. (2007). The scandal of social work education. Retrieved from http://www.nas.org/poldoc.cfm?doc_id=26
  • National Association of Social Workers. (1996). NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2015a). Social justice. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/pressroom/features/issue/peace.asp
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2015b). Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers policy statements, 2015-2018 (10th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2009). Americans speak out about HIV/AIDS: Community meetings and internet forum. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/practice/hiv_aids/2009/102109.asp
  • Pelton, L. H. (2001). Social justice and social work (invited essay). Journal of Social Work Education, 37(3), 433–439.
  • Ressler, L. E., & Hodge, D. R. (2003). Silenced voices: Social work and the oppression of conservative narratives. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 22, 125–142.
  • Rosen, R. A. H., Werley, H. H., Ager, J. W., & Shea, F. P. (1974). Health professionals’ attitudes toward abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 159–173. doi:10.1086/268149
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  • Will, G. (2007). Code of coercion. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.