A Meta-Analysis of Approaches to Engage Social Work Students Online

References

• Achilles, W., Byrd, K., Felder-Strauss, J., Franklin, P., & Janowich, J. (2011). Engaging students through communication and contact: Outreach can positively impact. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 128.
   Google Scholar
• Alrushiedat, N., & Olfman, L. (2013). Aiding participation and engagement in a blended learning environment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(2), 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Amador, J. A., & Mederer, H. (2013). Migrating successful student engagement strategies online: Opportunities and challenges using jigsaw groups and problem-based learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 89.
   Google Scholar
• Annala, J., Mákinen, M., Svárd, P., Silius, K., & Miilumáki, T. (2012). Online community environment promoting engagement in higher education. Studies for the Learning Society, 2(2–3), 75.
   Google Scholar
• ASHE. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, J. S. (2009). Blended learning as a new approach to social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, L. H., & Ballard, A. S. (2012). Student engagement and course registration methods as possible predictors of freshman retention. Research in Higher Education Journal, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Borgerson, D., & Dino, J. (2012). The feasibility, perceived satisfaction, and value of using synchronous webinars to educate clinical research professionals on reporting adverse events in clinical trials: A report from the Children’s oncology group. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 29(6), 316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabazon, T. (2002). Digital hemlock: Internet education and the poisoning of teaching. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. C., & Park, H. (2016). Longitudinal student research competency: Comparing online and traditional face-face learning platforms. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. L., & Mathews, D. A. (2013). A comparison of student knowledge and attitude toward research: Are main campus students different from those in a hybrid environment? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4/5), 467–480.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, K. M., Beyna, B., & Dudley-Brown, S. (2005). Promoting active learning through on-line discussion boards. Nurse Educator, 30(1), 32–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess, O. (2015). Cyborg teaching: The transferable benefits of teaching online for the face-to- face classroom. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 136.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, M., & Nafukho, F. M. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782.
   Google Scholar
• Chaumba, J. (2015). Using blogs to stimulate reflective thinking in a human behavior course. Social Work Education, 34(4), 377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chena, P. D., Lambertb, A. D., & Guidryb, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claman, F. L. (2015). The impact of multiuser virtual environments on student engagement. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(1), 13–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccoma, P., Peppers, C. A., & Molhoek, J. K. (2012). Creativity and wikis: Partnering virtual teams, technology, and social work education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 147.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2014). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, L. A. (2011). The new art of revision? Research papers, blogs, and the first-year composition classroom. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 39(2), 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2016). Online and distance programs. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Information/OnlineandDistanceEducation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Courts, B., & Tucker, J. (2012). Using technology to create a dynamic classroom experience. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 9(2), 121.
   Google Scholar
• Deters, F., Cuthrell, K., & Stapleton, J. (2010). Why wikis? Student perceptions of using wikis in online coursework. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 122.
   Google Scholar
• Donathan, L. N., & Hanks, M. (2010). Group project: A new online tool. Radiologic Technology, 82(2), 183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douville, M. L. (2013). The effectiveness of mutual aid learning communities in online MSW practice courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(1), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sheikh, E. M. (2009). Techniques for engaging students in an online computer programming course. Journal of Systemics, 7(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., Ostrander, N., & Crabtree-Nelson, S. (2013). Establishing a community of inquiry through hybrid courses in clinical social work education. Journal Of Teaching In Social Work, 33(4/5), 438–448.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, D., Canada, K., Cary, S., & Freese, R. (2016). Facilitating social work role plays in online courses: The use of video conferencing. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 78–92.
   Google Scholar
• Forgey, M. A., & Ortega-Williams, A. (2016). Effectively teaching social work practice online: Moving beyond can to how. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 59.
   Google Scholar
• Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 206–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Pleines, C. (2013). Fostering student interaction and engagement in a virtual learning environment: An investigation into activity design and implementation. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 342.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, L. (2006). Technology and reflective practice: The use of online discussion to enhance postconference clinical learning. Nurse Educator, 31, (5), 190–191. doi:10.1097/00006223-200609000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewege, C. R., & Perera, L. C. R. (2013). Pedagogical significance of wikis: Towards gaining effective learning outcomes. Journal of International Education in Business, 6(1), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R. (2005). The Internet-based education bandwagon: Look before you leap. Communicationof the ACM, 48(7), 97–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4). Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, H., & Wang, S. (2008). The use of webinar tool (Elluminate) to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from student trainers’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, K. (2013). Online video delivery: Past, present, and future. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 9(1s), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2015). A study of synchronous vs. asynchronous collaborative design in students” learning motivation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(5), 354–357.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, P. (2014). Engaging students in online courses. Research in Higher Education Journal, 26, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. (2009). Wonderful wikis and internet forums. Science and Children, 46(9), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, P. A. (2013). The evolution of distance learning and online education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4/5), 331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. O. (2014). Use of avatars and a virtual community to increase cultural competence. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1/2), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B., He, Y., & Robbins, H. H. (2006). Comparative analysis of preservice teachers’ reflective thinking in synchronous versus asynchronous online case discussions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 439.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Whitsett, D., & Wood, G. (2013). Teaching MSW social work practice in a blended online learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4/5), 408–420.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield, M. B., Rubinstein, K., & Pittman, M. E. (2015). Beyond PowerPoint™: Using learning objects to enhance social work courses. Journal Of Technology In Human Services, 33(2), 172–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, J. (2005). Teaching social work online: Dilemmas and debates. Social Work Education, 24(2), 185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mayorga, E. P., Bekerman, J. G., & Palis, A. G. (2014). Webinar software: A tool for developing more effective lectures (online or in-person). Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 21(2), 123–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon, G., & Coe, J. (2000). Technology and social work education: Recent empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 397–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2014). Online courses and online teaching strategies in higher education. Creative Education, 5(23), 2017–2019.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C., & Signor, L. (2014). Engaging diverse student cohorts: Did someone say completely online? International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(4), 364–367.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., Williams, K. C., Cameron, B. A., & Wade, C. E. (2014). Faculty perceptions of online group work. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(4), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Muncy, J. A. (2014). Blogging for reflection: The use of online journals to engage students in reflective learning. Marketing Education Review, 24(2), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• National Teacher Training Institute. (2011). Thirteen ed online. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/ntti/resources/video1.html
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D. B., Fellner, K. D., Frank, M., Small, M., Hetherington, R., Slater, R., & Daneman, D. (2012). Evaluation of an online education and support intervention for adolescents with diabetes. Social Work in Health Care, 51(9), 815–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D., & Russell, A. C. (2013). Research on webbed connectivity in a web-based learning environment: Online social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 496–513.
   Google Scholar
• Oravec, J. (2002, April). Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. F. (2010). Real problems, virtual solutions: Engaging students online. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelech, W., Wulff, D., Perrault, E., Ayala, J., Baynton, M., Williams, M., … Shankar, J. (2013). Current challenges in social work distance education: Responses from the elluminati. Journal Of Teaching In Social Work, 33(4/5), 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Pivec, M. (2012). Using the 3D virtual environments for teaching: Report from the field. Organizacija, 45(3), 125.
   Google Scholar
• Prestera, G., & Moller, L. (2001, April). Facilitating asynchronous distance learning. Exploiting opportunities for knowledge building in asynchronous distance learning environments. Paper presented at the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Quinney, L., & Fowler, P. (2013). Facilitating shared online group learning between careers, service users and social work students. Social Work Education, 32(8), 1021–1031.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp-McCall, L. A., & Anyikwa, V. (2016). Active learning strategies and instructor presence in an online research methods course: Can we decrease anxiety and enhance knowledge? Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2013). Distance and online social work education: Novel ethical challenges. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4/5), 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Reushle, S., & Mitchell, M. (2009). Sharing the journey of facilitator and learner: Online pedagogy in practice. Journal of Learning Design, 3(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, T. (2015). A worthy asset: The adjunct faculty and the influences on their job satisfaction. To Improve the Academy, 34(1–2), 156–170.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B. C., Gijselaers, W. H., Giesbers, S. J. H., & Tempelaar, D. T. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Keyes, E., & Schneider, D. A. (2013). Cultivating curiosity: Integrating hybrid teaching in courses in human behavior in the social environment. Journal Of Teaching In Social Work, 33(3), 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Roehm, S., & Bonnel, W. (2009). Engaging students for learning with online discussions. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4(1), 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, D. II & Rudd, D. P. (2014). The value of video in online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 13, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, A. N. E. (2011). Blogs as A learning space: Creating text of talks. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4(6), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, D. C., Siebert, C. F., & Spaulding-Givens, J. (2006). Teaching clinical social work skills primarily online: An evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(2), 325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, D. C., & Spaulding-Givens, J. (2006). Teaching clinical social work skills entirely online: A case example. Social Work Education, 25(1), 78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, K. K., & Mottet, T. P. (2009). Interactivity in a web conference training context: Effects on trainers and trainees. Communication Education, 57(1), 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Sull, E. C. (2014). A 2014 guide to engaging students: It’s not your grandfather’s online classroom! Distance Learning, 11(1), 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell, S. S. (2012). Collaborative learning through wikis. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(5), 34.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, D., & Egan, R. (2016). How useful are discussion boards and written critical reflections in helping social work students critically reflect on their field education placements? Qualitative Social Work, 15(2), 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschida, C. M., & Sevier, B. (2013). Teaching social studies online: An exemplar for examining the broader implications of online methods courses in teacher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 500–515.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, L. (2010). Constructive interference: Wikis and service learning in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 184–211.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wiest, C. (2015). Sense of Classroom Community: In online Social Work Education. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 22–49. doi:10.15640/jehd.v4n2_1a3
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. K., Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. C. (2002). Using group projects to enhance online learning. Journal of Teaching in Marriage & Family, 2(1), 115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. C., Cameron, B. A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Supporting online group Projects1. NACTA Journal, 56(2), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrad, A. (2016). A dynamic platform for developing 3D facial avatars in a networked virtual environment. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. doi:10.1155/2016/8489278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidan, T. (2015). Teaching social work in an online environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(3), 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzelsberger, H., Campbell, K. A., Service, D., & Sanchez, O. (2015). Using wikis to stimulate collaborative learning in two online health sciences courses. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(6), 352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoumenou, V., Sigman-Grant, M., Coleman, G., Malekian, F., & Zee, J. (2015). Identifying best practices for an interactive webinar. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 107(2), 62–69.
   Google Scholar