The One-minute Paper as a Catalyst for Change in Online Pedagogy

References

• Almer, E. D., Jones, K., & Moeckel, C. L. (1998). The impact of one-minute papers on learning in an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), 485–497.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., & Burns, S. (2013). One-minute paper: Student perception of learning gains. College Student Journal, 47(1), 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2018). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. Technology Trends, 62, 46. doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baleni, Z. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228–236. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed. gov/fulltext/EJ1062122.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, R., Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2010). Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from face-to-face to online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Williams, D. (1998). Inside the white box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, L. D., & Grantham, G. (2015). Teaching in graduate distance education: Perspectives on evaluating faculty engagement strategies. International Journal of Online Education, 29, 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chiara, J. F., & Ostrosky, A. L. (1998). The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings. Journal of Economic Education, 29(1), 3–10. doi:10.1080/00220489809596436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chizmar, J. F., & Ostrosky, A. L. (1998). The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings. The Journal of Economic Education, 29(1), 3–10. doi:10.1080/00220489809596436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243–256. doi:10.1080/02602930220138606
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, J., & Davis, L. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: Review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(1), 2333–2351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffe, W. L., & Sosin, K. (2010). Teaching with technology: May you live in interesting times. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(3), 278–291. doi:10.3200/JECE.36.3.278-291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Roldán, A., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, W. S. (1996). The one-minute paper: A communication tool for large lecture classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 229–230. doi:10.1021/ed073p229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y. (2019). Traffic light cards: A cross and modification between the minute paper and muddiest point. College Teaching, 67(1), 70–72. doi:10.1080/87567555.2018.1522612
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, W. J., & Murphy, J. J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom: A descriptive profile of a US public university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 54–67. doi:10.1177/1469787402003001005
   Google Scholar
• Lea, S. J, Stephenson, D, & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students' attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond 'educational bulimia'?. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321-334. doi:10.1080/03075070309293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & van Lieu, S. (2018). Traditional and online faculty members’ use of Classroom Assessment Technique (CATs): A mixed-method study. Journal of Instructional Research, 7, 90–99. doi:10.9743/JIR
   Google Scholar
• Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Assessing: Student assessment. In Learning and teaching in higher education: The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. M. (2010). Initiating student-teacher contact via personalized responses to one- minute papers. College Teaching, 58(2), 39–42. doi:10.1080/87567550903245631
   Google Scholar
• Magnan, B. (1991, January) Teaching idea: The one-minute paper’. Teaching Concerns [University of Virginia Newsletter]. Retrieved from http://cte.virginia.edu/resources/teaching-idea-the-one-minute-paper-3/
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. (2015). Learner-centered online instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 144, 57–71. doi:10.1002/tl.20163
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B., & Whistler, J. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T., & Yan, Z. (2017). Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(6), 562–574. doi:10.1111/jcal.v33.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D.M, Byrne, J.H, Massey, D.L, & Johnston, Amy N.B. (2018). Use of online asynchronous discussion boards to engage students, enhance critical thinking, and foster staff-student/student-student collaboration: a mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 70, 40-46. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), A Vol. in the educational psychology series. Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. P., Frith, K. H., & Colvin, M. M. (2010). Online assessment strategies: A primer. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, K. D. (2003). Ropes, poles, and space: Active learning in business education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 159–167. doi:10.1177/1469787403004002004
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. R. (2005). A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education., 6(2), 118–132. doi:10.1177/1469787405054237
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S. (2004). Assessing online learning and teaching: Adapting the minute paper. TechTrends, 48(4), 29–31. doi:10.1007/BF02763442
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S. K., & Boboc, M. (2013). Promoting formative assessment in online teaching and learning. Tech Trends, 57(4), 22–27. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (1985). Mental aerobics: The half-sheet response. Innovative Higher Education, 10(1), 23–31. doi:10.1007/BF00893466
   Google Scholar
• Zwelijongile, G. B. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The American Journal of Distance Education, 29, 56–66.
   Google Scholar