The Benefits of an Innovative Teaching Pedagogy Aimed at Combining Theory and Practice in Social Work

References

• Aachtenhagen, F., & Grubb, N. W. (2001). Vocational and occupational education: Pedgogical complexity, institutional diversity. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 604–639). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Aita, M., Héon, M., Dupuis, F., Le May, S., & Lampron, A. (2015). Groups of codevelopment for the advancement of research in clinical settings. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(1), 137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin, L. (2007). L’analyse de contenu [Content analysis]. Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Bell Sinclair, J., & Mitchell, R. (2000). Competency-based versus traditional cohort based technical education: A comparison of student’s perceptions. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 17(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, S., Mohr, J., Deal, K. H., & Hwang, J. (2012). Supervisor attachment, supervisory working alliance, and affect in social work field instruction. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512468492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (2015). Field education for clinical social work practice: Best practices and contemporary challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0526-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., Hughes, J., Woodford, M., & Regehr, G. (2004). Toward new approaches for evaluating student field performance: Tapping the implicit criteria used by experienced field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(3), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2004.10672297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2007). When values collide: Field instructors’ experiences of providing feedback and evaluating competence. The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1/2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v26n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Brahimi, C. (2011). L’approche par compétences. Un levier de changement des pratiques en santé publique au Québec [The competency-based approach. A lever for changing public health practices in Quebec]. Institut national de santé publique du Québec. https://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/1228_ApprocheCompetences.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Social Work Education - CASWE. (2014). Standards for Accreditation.
   Google Scholar
• Carignan, L. (2013). La pensée et l’analyse critique sont-elles compatibles avec les référentiels de compétences [Are critical thinking and analysis compatible with competency frameworks] (Chapter 2. In L. Carignan & M. Foudrignier (Eds.), Pratiques réflexives et référentiels de compétences dans les formations sociales [Reflective practices and competency frameworks in social trainings] (pp. 2–48). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3 ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Social Work Education [CSWE]. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2008-EPAS/2008EDUCATIONALPOLICYANDACCREDITATIONSTANDARDS(EPAS)-08-24-2012.pdf.aspx
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators. (2011). Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 694–702. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, J.-P., & Kérisit, M. (1997). Devis de recherche qualitative [Qualitative research design. In J. Poupart, L.-H. Groulx, J. P. Deslauriers, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & A. P. Pires (Eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques[Qualitative research. epistemological and methodological issues.] (pp. 85–109). Gaëtan Morin.
   Google Scholar
• Dufault, G. S., Gusew, A., Bélanger, E., & Côté, I. (2017). Introduction. In S. G. Dufault, A. Gusew, E. Bélanger, & I. Côté (Eds.), Accompagner le projet de formation pratique en travail social. [Support the practical training project in social work] (pp. 1–12). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Fèvre, L. (1993). Le travail social: Théories et pratiques [Social work: Theories and practices]. Les Éditions de la Chronique sociale. et al. Synthèse [Summary].
   Google Scholar
• Filliettaz, L. (2011). Collective guidance at work: A resource for apprentices? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2011.580359
   Google Scholar
• Fiquet, L., Huge, S., Annezo, F., Chapron, A., Allory, E., & Renaut, P. (2015). “Une formation inter professionnelle pour apprendre à travailler ensemble. La perception des étudiants en santé. “ [An Interprofessional training program to learn to work together. The perception of health care students]. Pédagogie Médicale, 16(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2015018
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v11n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., & Kaye, L. (2002). Learning opportunities in field practica: Identifying skills and activities associated with MSW students’ self-evaluation of performance and satisfaction. The Clinical Supervisor, 21(5), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., & Calvazos, A. (2007). Does practice make perfect? The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1–2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v26n01_15
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, C. R. (2004). Anxiety experienced by foundation-year MSW students entering field placement: Implications for admissions, curriculum, and field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2004.10778478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, C. R., & Lloyd, C. M. (2008). Field notes—Pre-placement anxiety among foundation-year MSW students: A follow-up study. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(1), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globerman, J., & Bogo, M. (2003). Changing times: Understanding social workers motivation to be field instructors. Social Work, 48(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/48.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusew, A. (2017). La signature pédagogique de la formation pratique des programmes en travail social [The pedagogical signature of the practical training of programs in social work. In S. G. Dufault, A. Gusew, E. Bélanger, & I. Côté (Eds.), Accompagner le projet de formation pratique en travail social. Complexité, enjeux, défis [Support the practical training project in social work. Complexity, issues, challenges] (pp. 16- 35). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, H., Harris, R., Simons, M., & Karmel, T. (2009). Teaching for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 851–863). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C. O., Finch, J. B., & Franks, C. L. (2013). Learning to teach: Teaching to learn (2nd ed.). Council on Social Work Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2006). What is an authentic learning environment? In A. J. Herrington & J. A. Herrington (Eds.), Authentic learning environments in higher education (pp. 1–13). Information Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325220802490828
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, C. A., & Poe, N. T. (2015). Developing and maintaining partnerships with practice settings. In C. A. Hunter, J. K. Moen, & M. S. Raskin (Eds.), Social work field directors: Foundations for excellence (pp. 65–82). Lyceum Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students’ views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Fortune, A. E. (2013a). Do we need more “doing” activities or “thinking” activities in the field practicum? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(4), 646–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2013.812851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Fortune, A. E. (2013b). Patterns of field learning activities and their relation to learning outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(3), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2013.796786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre, M. (2005). Facilitating practice learning assessment: The influence ofrelationship. Social Work Education, 24(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500132806
   Google Scholar
• Loubet Del Bayle, J. L. (2000). Initiation aux méthodes des sciences sociales [Introduction to social science methods]. L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Miehls, D., Everett, J., Segal, C., & Du Bois, C. (2013). MSW students’ views of supervision: Factors contributing to satisfactory field experiences. The Clinical Supervisor, 32(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2013.782458
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W., & Crabtree, B. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, M. H., Boily, M., Turbide, C., & Héon, N. (2013). Le recours à des vidéos pour favoriser l’apprentissage de la méthodologie de l’intervention sociale auprès des personnes en travail social [The use of videos to promote the learning of the methodology of social intervention among people in social work. In Pratiques pédagogiques novatrices dans les programmes de formation universitaire en travail social (pp. 35–54). Québec. (81e congrès de l’ACFAS, Université Laval, 7-8 mai 2013), sous la dir. de Gusew, Annie.
   Google Scholar
• Order of Social Workers and Marriage and Family Therapists of Quebec. (2012). Référentiel de compétences des travailleuses sociales et des travailleurs sociaux, 2012. [Competency framework of social workers]. Montréal. Repéréà https://www1.otstcfq.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/referentiel_de_competences_des_travailleurs_sociaux.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2012). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales [Qualitative analysis in social science] (3rd éd ed.). Armand Collin.
   Google Scholar
• Payette, A. (2000). Le codéveloppement professionnel: Une approche graduée [Professional co-development: A gradual approach]. Interactions, 4(2), 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Payette, A., & Champagne, C. (2000). Le groupe de codéveloppement professionnel [Professional co-development group]. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, A. P. (1997). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologie [Sampling and qualitative research: Theoretical essay andmethodology. In J. Poupart, L.-H. Groulx, J. P. Deslauriers, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & A. P. Pires (Eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques [Qualitative research. epistemological and methodological challenges] (pp. 113–167). Gaëtan Morin.
   Google Scholar
• Policard, F. (2014). “Apprendre à travailler ensemble: L’interprofessionnalité en formation par la simulation au service du développement des compétences collaboratives.“ [Learning together to work together: Interprofessionality in training through simulation for collaborative skills development]. Recherches En Soins Infirmiers, 117, 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. S., Wayne, J., & Bogo, M. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr, C., Bogo, M., & Regehr, G. (2011). The development of an online practice-based evaluation tool. Research in Social Work Practice, 21(4), 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731510395948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr, G., Bogo, M., Regehr, C., & Power, R. (2007). Can we build a better mousetrap? Improving measures of social work practice performance in the field. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2007.200600607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rompf, E. L., Royse, D., & Shooper, S. S. (1993). Anxiety preceding field work: What students worry about. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 7(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v07n02_07
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzburg, A., Greene, G. J., & Drew, H. (2010). Using live supervision in field education: Preparing social work students for clinical practice. Families in Society, 91(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, H., Van der Schaaf, M. F., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Development of students’ personal professional theories in senior secondary vocational education. Evaluation & Research in Education, 24(2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.550280
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2012). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, A. (1999). Issues BSW interns experience in their first semester’s practicum. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v18n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (2009). Connectivity and transformation in work-related learning – theoretical foundations. In M.-L. Stenström & P. Tynjälä (Eds.), Towards integration of work and learning: Strategies for connectivity and transformation (pp. 11–37). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Viau-Guay, A. (2014). L’intégration des savoirs théoriques, pratiques et d’autorégulation chez les apprenants: Analyse de l’activité d’enseignement en formation professionnelle et contribution à la formation à l’enseignement [Teaching in vocational education in order to facilitate learner theory, practice and self-regulation knowledge integration: Activity analysis and contribution to teacher education]. Activités, 11(2), à. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.965
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2015). Nontraditional field models. In C. A. Hunter, J. K. Moen, & M. Raskin (Eds.), Social work field directors: Foundations for excellence (pp. 41–59). Lyceum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weddle, A. B., & Hollan, J. D. (2010). Professional perception and expert action: Scaffolding embodied practices in professional. Education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030902721754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zendell, A. L., Fortune, A. E., Mertz, L. K. P., & Koelewyn, N. (2007). University–community partnerships in gerontological social work: Building consensus around student learning. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 50(1/2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v50n01_11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar