Unique challenges of segmentation and differentiation for higher education

References

• Aaker, D. A., & Shansby, J. G. (1982). Positioning your product. Business Horizons, 25(3), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(82)90130-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo, F., Pergelova, A., & Rialp, J. (2010). A market segmentation approach for higher education based on rational and emotional factors. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241003788029
   Google Scholar
• Bay, D., & Daniel, H. (2001). The student is not the customer—An alternative perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v11n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Bingham Jr, F. G. (1996). An enrollment marketing plan for institutions of higher learning: An update. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v07n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Blasco, M. F., & Saura, I. G. (2006). Segmenting university students on the basis of their expectations. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 16(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v16n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Bock, D. E., Poole, S. M., & Joseph, M. (2014). Does branding impact student recruitment: A critical evaluation. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2014.908454
   Google Scholar
• Borden, V. M. (1995). Segmenting student markets with a student satisfaction and priorities survey. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., Brodnick, R., & Pinckley, D. (2007). De-Mystifying the U.S. News rankings: How to understand what matters, what doesn’t and what you can actually do about it. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240801912385
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C. S. (2005). From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, C. W., & George, M. A. (2003). Key elements of a successful drive toward marketing strategy making. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 13(1/2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v13n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M., Horta, H., Malighetti, P., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2019). Universities’ attractiveness to students: The Darwinism effect. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-H. (2008). Internationalization or international marketing? Two frameworks for understanding international students’ choice of Canadian universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240802100113
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: A segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2012). Higher education marketing: A study on the impact of social media on study selection and university choice. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM, 2(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtem.2012010104
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, J. A., Grewal, R., & Lilien, G. L. (2019). Strategic manipulation of university rankings, the prestige effect, and student university choice. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR, 56(4), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719831258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, P. R., & Ginter, J. L. (1987). Market segmentation, product differentiation, and marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298705100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710723025
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. K., Javalgi, R., & Whipple, T. W. (2007). Service strategies for higher educational institutions based on student segmentation. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240801912641
   Google Scholar
• Guilbault, M. (2018). Students as customers in higher education: The (controversial) debate needs to end. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. R., & Gaskin, S. P. (1984). Application of the “defender” consumer model. Marketing Science, 2(4), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.3.4.327
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. R., & Shugan, S. M. (1983). Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Science, 2(4), 319–360. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2.4.319
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. R., & Simmie, P. (1981). Profit maximizing perceptual positions: An integrated theory for the selection of product features and price. Management Science, 27(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. R., & Urban, G. L. (1979). Assessment of attribute importances and consumer utility functions: Von Neumann–Morgenstern theory applied to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1086/208737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley-Brown, J. (2016). Higher education market segmentation. In J. Shin, & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–3). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669176
   Google Scholar
• Herridge, B., & Heil, R. (2003). Building a better applicant pool – A case study of the use of predictive modeling and market segmentation to build and enroll better pools of students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 13(1/2), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v13n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Hoverstad, R., LambJr.C. W., & Miller, P. (1989). College benefit segmentation analysis: Approach and results. Advances in Consumer Research, 16(1), 332–338.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, T. A., Scott, P. F., & Clark, J. L. (2001). Segmenting markets in Urban higher education: Community- versus campus-centered students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v11n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control (9th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. (1979). Variety, equity, and efficiency: Product variety in an industrial society (Vol. 10). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. S. (1998). Integrating strategic marketing on an institutional level. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8(4), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v08n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. S., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2000). Institutional entrepreneurship-A panacea for universities-in-transition? European Journal of Marketing, 34(11), 1315–1337. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010348470
   Google Scholar
• Maggard, J. P. (1976). Positioning revisited. Journal of Marketing, 40(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297604000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, J. (2018). Panicked universities in search of students are adding thousands of new majors. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/panicked-universities-in-search-of-students-are-adding-thousands-of-new-majors/
   Google Scholar
• Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2008). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 35(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
   Google Scholar
• McCollough, M. A., & Gremler, D. D. (1999). Guaranteeing student satisfaction: An exercise in treating students as customers. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475399212005
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. M. (2002). Attitudes about marketing in higher education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v12n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Muuka, G. N., & Ezumah, B. A. (2013). AACSB accreditation: Towards assurance of learning best practices for the 5Th year maintenance report. Academy of Business Research Journal, 3, 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, L. (2009). Applying marketing to higher education: Scope and limits. Management & Marketing, 4(2), 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. J. (2014). Innovating the marketing curriculum: Establishing an academic major in internet marketing. Atlantic Marketing Journal, 3(2), 172–182.
   Google Scholar
• Pechmann, C., & Ratneshwar, S. (1991). The use of comparative advertising for brand positioning: Association versus differentiation. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1086/209248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentina, I., & Neeley, C. (2007). Differences in characteristics of online versus traditional students: Implications for target marketing. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v17n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Poole, S. M., Levin, M. A., & Elam, K. (2018). Getting out of the rankings game: A better way to evaluate higher education institutions for best fit. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1311981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1976). Interbrand choice, strategy, and bilateral market power (Issue 146). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1976). Economics. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzel, K., Callahan, T., Scott, C. J., & Davis, T. (2011). Reaching the non-traditional stopout population: A segmentation approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.569590
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295602100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trout, J., & Ries, A. (1972). Positioning cuts through chaos in marketplace. Advertising Age, 43, 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. News. (2020). The best colleges in America, ranked. U.S. News Best Colleges. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. H., Parsons, A. L., & Alexander, C. (2018). A strategic approach to the implementation of the 2013 AACSB international standards. Business Education Innovation Journal, 10(1), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. E. (2008). Targeting, segmenting and positioning the market for college students to increase customer satisfaction and overall performance. College Student Journal, 42(3), 891–895.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., & Kriewall, M. A. (1980). State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR, 17(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. R. (2002). Choice-based segmentation as an enrollment management tool. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v12n02_05
   Google Scholar