The Influence of Distance on French International Trade (1850 to 1913): A Comparison with Germany

References

• Anderson, J. E., and E. Van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93:170–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asselain, J-C., and B. Blancheton. 2005. “Dynamique De L’ouverture Internationale. Paradoxes, Enjeux, Éléments D’interprétation À Partir Du Cas De La France.” Economies Et Sociétés (HEQ) 1:49–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bairoch, P. 1974. “Geographical Structure and Trade Balance of European Foreign Trade from 1800 to 1970.” Journal of European Economic History 3:557–608.
   Google Scholar
• Bairoch, P. 1993. “La France Dans Le Contexte International: Politique Commerciale Et Commerce Extérieur 1890-1990.” In Le Commerce Extérieur Français De Méline À Nos Jours, 3–33. Paris: CHEFF (Comité pour l’Histoire Economique et Financière de la France).
   Google Scholar
• Becuwe, S., and B. Blancheton. 2014. “The Dispersion of Customs Tariffs in France between 1850 and 1913: Discrimination in Trade Policy.” Research in Economic History 30:163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Becuwe, S., B. Blancheton, and L. Charles. 2013. “Les Grandes Tendances Du Commerce Extérieur Français Pendant La Première Mondialisation.” Economies & Sociétés 9:1515–1537.
   Google Scholar
• Becuwe, S., B. Blancheton, and C. M. Meissner. 2015. “Stages of Diversification: France, 1836-1938”. NBER Working Paper Series, n°21777.
   Google Scholar
• Broder, A. 1993. “Le Tarif De 1892 Et Les Industries Nouvelles: Une Première Approche.” In Le Commerce Extérieur Français De Méline À Nos Jours, 53–65. Paris: CHEFF (Comité pour l’Histoire Economique et Financière de la France).
   Google Scholar
• Broder, A. 2013. “Le Commerce De La France Et De l’Allemagne Avec Le Cône Sud De l’Amérique Latine: Argentine Et Brésil 1880-1914.” Causes Et Moyens D’une Évolution Inversée. Economies Et Sociétés (HEQ) 9:1491–1514.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, J-F., C. Carrere, P. Guillaumont, and J. De Melo. 2005. “Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model.” The World Bank Economic Review 19 (1):99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. 2012. German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dedinger, B. 2006. “From Virtual Free-Trade to Virtual Protectionism. Or, Did Protectionism Have Any Part in Germany’s Rise to Commercial Power 1850-1913.” In Classical Trade Protectionism 1815–1914, eds., 219–241. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dedinger, B. 2012. “The Franco-German Trade Puzzle: An Analysis of the Economic Consequences of the Franco-Prussian War.” Economic History Review 65:1029–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormois, J-P. 2006. “The Impact of Late-Nineteenth Century Tariffs on the Productivity of European Industries (1870-1930).” In Classical Trade Protectionism 1815–1914, eds., 160–192. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dormois, J-P. 2009. La Défense Du Travail National? L’incidence Du Protectionnisme Sur L’industrie En Europe (1870-1913). Paris: PUPS.
   Google Scholar
• Estevadeordal, A., B. Frankz, and A. Taylor. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2):359–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federico, G., and M. A Vasta. 2010. “Was Industrialization an Escape from the Commodity Lottery? Evidence from Italy, 1861-1939.” Explorations in Economic History 47 (2):228–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federico, G., and N. Wolf. 2011. “Comparative Advantages in Italy: A Long-Run Perspective”. Quaderni di Storia Economica n°9, Banca d’Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman-Peck, J. 1998. Historical Foundations of Globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• GeoDist database from CEPII. http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/fr/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6.
   Google Scholar
• Global Financial Data. https://www.globalfinancialdata.com/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guillaumet, P. 2002. “Les Relations Commerciales Entre La France Et l’Europe Depuis 1850.” Impact Sur La Croissance Économique De La France. Revue De l’OFCE 82:49–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, H. 1915. Les Méthodes Allemandes D’expansion Économique. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, M., C. M. Meissner, and K. Oosterlink. 2015. “Technology and Geography in the Second Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade.” NBER Working Paper. N°20851.
   Google Scholar
• Humair, C. 2004. “Développement Économique Et Etat Central (1815-1914).” Un siècle de politique douanière suisse au service des élites. Peter Lang, Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Jacks, D. S., C. M. Meissner, and D. Novy. 2011. “Trade Booms, Trade Busts and Trade Costs.” Journal of International Economics 83 (2):185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. 1956. The Terms of Trade: A European Case Study. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, M. 2009. “Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade. Evidence for Cobden-Chevalier Network 1860-1875.” Journal of Economic History 69:1012–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, N. 1973. “Tropical Trade and Development in the Nineteenth Century: The Brazilian Experience.” Journal of Political Economy 81 (3):678–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. A. 1981. “The Rate of Growth of World Trade 1870-1913.” In The World Economic Order. Past and Prospects, eds., 11–74. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison Project Database. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison.
   Google Scholar
• Maizels, A. 1963. Industrial Growth and World Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, T., and S. Zignago 2011. “Notes on CEPII Distances Measures the Geodist Database.” CEPII Working Paper, n° 15.
   Google Scholar
• Pahre, R. 2008. Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century: The “Agreeable Customs” of 1815-1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, R., and H. Rey. 2005. “The Determinants of Cross-Border Equity Flows.” Journal of International Economics 65 (2):269–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RICardo. www.ricardo.medialab.sciences-po.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. “The Log of Gravity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4):641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schowb, M. 1896. Le Danger Allemand. Chailley: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Senger, F. 2015. La Création De L’office National Du Commerce Extérieur (1883-1898): Maîtrise De L’information Compétitive Internationale Et Stratégie Française De Puissance. Thèse en Histoire, Université d’Artois.
   Google Scholar
• Siliverstovs, B., and D. Schumacher. 2009. “Estimating Gravity Equations: To Log or Not to Log?” Empirical Economics 36 (3):645–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanziani, A. 2010. “Economic Information on International Markets: French Strategies in the Italian Mirror (Nineteenth-Early Twentieth Centuries).” Enterprise and Society 11 (1):26–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisch des Deutschen Reichs – Reue Folge Spezialhandel im Jahre, annual publication, between 1880 and 1913.
   Google Scholar
• Tableau général du commerce de la France avec ses colonies étrangères, Paris, Imprimerie Nationale, annual publication, between 1836 and 1895.
   Google Scholar
• Tableau général du commerce et de la navigation, Paris, Imprimerie Nationale, annual publication, between 1896 and 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Temin, P. 1997. “Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 57:63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tokarick, S. 2006. “Does Import Protection Discourage Exports?” IMF Working Paper n° 06/20.
   Google Scholar
• Tyszynski, H. 1951. “World Trade in Manufactured Commodities. 1899-1950.” Manchester School 19:272–304.
   Google Scholar
• Verley, P. 1988. “Exportations Et Croissance Économique Dans La France Du XIXe Siècle.” Annales ESC 43 (1):73–110.
   Google Scholar
• Verley, P. 1997. L’échelle Du Monde. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Weiller, J. 1969. “Échanges Extérieurs Et Politique Commerciale De La France Depuis 1870.” Economies Et Sociétés III, 10:1745–1878.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J., and F. Wilhelmsson. 2009. “Estimating the Gravity Model without Gravity Using Panel Data.” Applied Economics 43 (6):641–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, N. 2009. “Was Germany Ever United? Evidence from Intra and International Trade 1885-1933.” The Journal of Economic History 69 (03):846–881.
   Google Scholar