Economic Geography of U.S. Apparel Trade: Home Market and Vertical Linkage Effects

References

• Brambilla, I., A. K. Khandelwal, and P. K. Schott. 2010. “China’s Experience under the Multifiber Arrangement and the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.” In China’s Growing Role in World Trade, edited by R. Feenstra and S. J. Wei, 315–387. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A., and S. Christoffersen. 2005. “Production Costs, Scale Economies and Technical Change in the U.S. Textile and Apparel Industries.” Atlantic Economic Journal 32 (1): 201–213. doi:10.1007/s11293-005-3768-8
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A., and M. Kouliavtsev. 2009. “NAFTA and the Realignment of U.S. Textile and Apparel Trade: Trade Creation or Trade Diversion?” Review of International Economics 17 (1): 172–186. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00783.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A., and M. Kouliavtsev. 2020. “The End of the Multifiber Arrangement and the Pattern of U.S. Apparel Trade: A Gravity Model Analysis.” Journal of Economic Studies 47 (3): 695–710. doi:10.1108/JES-05-2018-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein. 1999. “Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation.” European Economic Review 43 (1): 379–409. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00063-4
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein. 2003. “Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Test.” Journal of International Economics 59 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00088-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. L., and J. Harrigan. 2005a. “Tight Clothing: How the MFA Affects Asian Apparel Exports.” In International Trade in East Asia, edited by T. Ito and A. Rose, 366–386. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. L., and J. Harrigan. 2005b. “Distance, Time and Specialization: Lean Retailing in General Equilibrium.” The American Economic Review 95 (1): 292–313. doi:10.1257/0002828053828590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., J. A. Markusen, and A. K. Rose. 2001. “Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among Alternative Theories of Trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics 34 (2): 430–442. doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukao, K., T. Okubo, and R. M. Stern. 2003. “An Econometric Analysis of Trade Diversion under NAFTA.” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 14 (1): 3–24. March. doi:10.1016/S1062-9408(02)00118-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, G. H., and C. Xiang. 2004. “The Home Market Effect and Bilateral Trade Patterns.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 1108–1129. doi:10.1257/0002828042002688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan, J., and G. Barrows. 2009. “Testing the Theory of Trade Policy: Evidence from the Abrupt End of the Multi Fibre Arrangement.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 282–294. doi:10.1162/rest.91.2.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., and J. Ries. 2001. “Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of U.S.-Canada Trade.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 858–876. doi:10.1257/aer.91.4.858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, M., and S. Kar. 2011. “Multi Fibre Arrangement and Textile Industry in South Asia.” In South-South Globalization Challenges and Opportunities for Development, edited by S. Mansoob Murshed, G. Pedro, and L. A. Serino, 130–171. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kar, S., and M. Kar. 2016. “Multi-market Firms and Export Quota: Effects of Withdrawal of the Multi Fiber Arrangement.” In Understanding Development: An Indian Perspective on Legal and Economic Policies, edited by S. Banerjee, Mukherjee, V. and Haldar, S.K., 99–113. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1980. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P., and A. J. Venables. 1995. “Globalization and the Inequality of Nations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (4): 857–880. doi:10.2307/2946642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzoso, I., D. Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann, and S. Vollmer. 2007. “The Log of Gravity Revisited. Center for Globalization and Europeanization of the Economy.” Discussion Papers 64, University of Gottingen.
   Google Scholar
• Mlachila, M, and Y. Yang. 2004. “The End of Textiles Quotas: A Case Study of the Impact on Bangladesh.” Working Paper 04/108, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nordas, H. K. 2004. “The Global Textile and Clothing Industry Post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.” WTO Discussion Paper 5, World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Oostendorp, Remco H. 2012. “The Occupational Wages around the World (OWW) Database: Update for 1983–2008.” Background Paper for the World Development Report 2013, World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, D., and B. Siliverstovs. 2006. “Home-Market and Factor-Endowment Effects in a Gravity Approach.” Review of World Economics 42 (2): 330–353. doi:10.1007/s10290-006-0070-z
   Google Scholar
• Spinanger, D. 2003. “Beyond Eternity: What Will Happen When Textile and Clothing Quotas are Eliminated as of 21/12/2004?” Mimeo. Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel: Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, A. J. 1996. “Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries.” International Economic Review 37 (2): 341–359. doi:10.2307/2527327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar