Special educational resources in the Swedish upper secondary schools: a total population survey

References

• Abbott, L. 2007. “Northern Ireland Special Educational Needs Coordinators Creating Inclusive Environments: An Epic Struggle.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 22(4): 391–407.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandersson, M. 2011. “Equivalence and Choice in Combination: The Swedish Dilemma.” Oxford Review of Education 37(2): 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnman, G., M. Järnek, and E. Lindskog. 2004. Valfrihet: Fiktion och verklighet [Freedom of Choice: Fiction and Reality (STEP, Research Reports 4)]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Arreman, I. E., and A. Holm. 2011. “Privatisation of Public Education? The Emergence of Independent Upper Secondary Schools in Sweden.” Journal of Education Policy 26(2): 225–243. doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.502701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A., ed. 2012. Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. Vol. 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452218533.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R. 2004. “Census.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, edited by M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing Liao, 111–113. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, A., P. Edin, P. Fredriksson, and A. Krueger. 2004. Education, Equality and Efficiency – An Analysis of Swedish School Reforms During the 1990’s. (Report no. 2004:1). Uppsala: IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, A., M. Clark, P. Edin, P. Fredriksson, and A. Krueger. 2005. The Market Comes to Education in Sweden: An Evaluation of Sweden’s Surprising School Reforms. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. 2004. “The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s.” Social Policy & Administration 38(2): 139–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00382.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., and M. Lindahl. 2007. “The Impact of School Choice on Pupil Achievement, Segregation and Costs: Swedish evidence.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 2786. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., and M. Lindahl. 2008. “Does School Privatization Improve Educational Achievement? Evidence from Sweden’s Voucher Reform.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 3691. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., and M. Lindahl. 2012. “Independent Schools and Long-run Educational Outcomes – Evidence from Sweden’s Large Scale Voucher Reform.” Working Paper No. 2012:19. Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and, Education Policy (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Bunar, N. 2008. “The Free Schools ‘Riddle’: Between Traditional Social Democratic, Neo-liberal and Multicultural Tenets.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52(4): 423–438. doi:10.1080/00313830802184608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunar, N. 2010. “Choosing for Quality or Inequality: Current Perspectives on the Implementation of School Choice Policy in Sweden.” Journal of Education Policy 25(1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, B. A. 2005. “Mission Impossible? Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and the Re-conceptualization of the Role of the SENCO in England and Wales.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 20(3): 287–307.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, D., A. Dyson, and A. Millward. 2001. “Supporting Pupils with Special Educational Needs: Issues and Dilemmas for Special Needs Coordinators in English Primary Schools.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 16(2): 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Daun, H. 2003. “Market Forces and Decentralization in Sweden: Impetus for School Development or Threat to Comprehensiveness and Equity?” In Choosing Choice: School Choice in International Perspective, edited by D. N. Plank and G. Sykes, 92–111. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 1994. Läroplaner för de frivilliga skolformerna, lpf-94 [Curricula for the Upper Secondary School 1994].
   Google Scholar
• EADSNE (European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education). 2006. Special Needs Education in Europe (Volume 2) Provision in Post-Primary Education. Brussels: Thematic Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, I., B. Persson, and J. Rosenqvist. 2001. Forskning inom det specialpedagogiska området: – en kunskapsöversikt [Research in the Special Education Field: A Knowledge Overview]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, A. 2009. “On the Consequences of the Marketisation of Public Education in Sweden: For-profit Charter Schools and the Emergence of the ‘Market-oriented teacher’.” European Educational Research Journal 8(2): 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrbo, I. 2012. “Idén om en skola för alla och specialpedagogisk organisering i praktiken [The Idea of Inclusive Schools and How to Organize Special Education in Practice].” PhD diss., University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, K., J. Malmqvist, and C. Nilholm. 2013. “Local School Ideologies and Inclusion: The Case of Swedish Independent Schools.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 28(1): 49–63. doi:10.1080/08856257.2012.743730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. E. 2006. Lika rättigheter – likvärdig Utbildning? [Equal Rights – Equivalent Education?]. Stockholm: Rädda Barnen.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. E. 2007. “Kommentar [A Comment].” In Friskolorna och framtiden [Free Schools and the Future], edited by A. Lindbom, 119–126. Stockholm: Institutet för framtidsstudier.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, A., and A. Sullivan. 2011. “Introduction: The Democratisation of Upper Secondary Education?” Oxford Review of Education 37(2): 123–138. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.559386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultqvist, E. 2001. “Segregerande integrering: – en studie av gymnasieskolans individuella program [Segregating Integration: A Study of the Swedish Upper Secondary School Individual Programme].” PhD diss., University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, J. 2009. “Spänningen mellan normalitet och avvikelse – om skolans insatser för elever i behov av särskilt stöd [The Tension between Normality and Deviation – About Schools’ Stakes for Pupils in need of Special Support].” PhD diss., Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., J. O. Jonsson, and F. Rudolphi. 2012. “Ethnic Inequality in Choice-driven Education Systems: A Longitudinal Study of Performance and Choice in England and Sweden.” Sociology of Education 85(2): 158–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, B. 2009. Grundläggande statistisk analys [Basic Statistical Analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, L. 2005. “Special Educational Needs Coordinators and Leadership: A Role Too Far.” Support for Learning 20(2): 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M. 2013. “Ideas and Consequences of Market Principles in Education: The Swedish Case in an International Perspective: Evaluating the Consequences of Educational Privatization.” Paper presented at the meeting of The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, S., L. Lundahl, J. Lindgren, and G. Zackari. 2002. “Educating for the New Sweden?” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46(3): 283–303. doi:10.1080/0031383022000005689.
   Google Scholar
• Friskolorna och framtiden – segregation, kostnader och effektivitet [Independent Schools and the Future – Segregation, Costs and Efficiency] Lindbom A. Institutet för Framtidsstudier Stockholm 2007
   Google Scholar
• Lindbom, A. 2010. “School Choice in Sweden: Effects on Student Performance, School Costs, and Segregation.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54(6): 615–630. doi:10.1080/00313831.2010.522849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbom, A., and E. Almgren. 2007. “Valfrihetens effekter på skolornas elevsammansättning [The Effects of School Choice for Schools’ Student Composition].” In Friskolorna och framtiden [Free Schools and the Future], edited by A. Lindbom, 89–112. Stockholm: Institutet för framtidsstudier.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. 2002. “Sweden: Decentralization, Deregulation, Quasi-markets – and Then What?” Journal of Education Policy 17(6): 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. 2007. “A Review of Recent Developments in the Role of the SENCo in the UK.” British Journal of Special Education 34(4): 212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, E. H., and A. M. Hansen. 2009. “Inclusive and Exclusive Education in Sweden: Principals’ Opinions and Experiences.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 24(4): 465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 1997. Skollagen 1985:1100 [Education Act 1985:1100]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2010. Skollagen (2010:800) [Education Act (2010:800)]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Möllås, G. 2009. “Detta ideliga mötande’ – en studie av hur kommunikation och samspel konstituerar gymnasielevers skolpraktik [Always these Meetings’ – A Study of Communication and Interaction Constituting the School Practice of Upper Secondary Students].” PhD diss., Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Å. 2007. “Genomströmningen i gymnasieskolan, före och efter gymnasiereformen [The Student Flow in Upper Secondary Education, before and after the Upper Secondary Reform].” In Utbildningsvägen – vart leder den? om ungdomar, utbildning och försörjning [The Education Path – Where does it Lead? About Youths, Education and Supply], edited by J. Olofsson, 143–157. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Å., and S. Sundin. 2008. “Student Flows and Employment Opportunities before and after Implementation of a Third Year in Vocational Programmes at Upper Secondary School.” European Journal of Vocational Training 44(2): 110–131.
   Google Scholar
• Niepel, V., K. Edmark, and M. Frölich. 2012. “The Short- and Long-term Effects of School Choice on Student Outcomes – Evidence from a School Choice Reform in Sweden.” CDSE Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Östh, J., E. Andersson, and B. Malmberg. 2013. “School Choice and Increasing Performance Difference: A Counterfactual Approach.” Urban Studies 50 (2): 407–425. doi: 10.1177/0042098012452322.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenqvist, J. 2007. “Några aktuella specialpedagogiska forskningstrender [Some Current Special Education Research Trends].” In Reflektioner kring specialpedagogik: sex professorer om forskningsområdet och forskningsfronterna. [Reflections on Special Education: Six Professors on Research Area and Research Fronts], edited by C. Nilholm and E. Björck-Åkesson, 36–51. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2004. Vad kostar de fristående skolorna? – en studie om fristående grundskolor och kommunernas kostnader [What do the Independent Schools Cost? – A Study of Independent Compulsory Schools and the Municipalities’ Costs]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2006. Schools like Any Other? Free Schools as Part of the System 1991–2004. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2007. En sammanfattning av resultat och erfarenheter under tre år [A Summary of Results and Experiences over Three Years]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 1999. Nationella kvalitetsgranskningar 1998. Rapport nr 160 [National Quality Reviews 1998. Report no. 160] Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2008a. Studieavbrott och stödinsatser i gymnasieskolan. En kunskapssammanställning [Study Breaks and Support in the Upper Secondary School. A Knowledge Compilation]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2008b. Studieresultat i gymnasieskolan – en statistisk beskrivning av ofullständiga gymnasiestudier [Study Results in the Upper Secondary School – A Statistical Description of Incomplete Upper Secondary Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2010. Risk för IG. Gymnasierektorer om skolornas stöd till elever som riskerar att inte nå målen [Risk of IG. Upper Secondary Principals about Support for Students at Risk not Achieving the Educational Goals]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2011. Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola2011 [Curricula, Examination Goals and Common Subjects for Upper Secondary Schools 2011]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2012. Elevutveckling och kostnadsutveckling i gymnasieskolan 2005–2009 [Student Development and Cost Development in the Upper Secondary School 2005–2009]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE (Swedish National Agency for Education). 2013. Curriculum for the Upper Secondary School. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Szwed, C. 2007. “Reconsidering the Role of the Primary Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator: Policy, Practice and Future Priorities.” British Journal of Special Education 34(2): 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Takala, M., R. Pirttimaa, and M. Törmänen. 2009. “Inclusive Special Education: The Role of Special Education Teachers in Finland.” British Journal of Special Education 36(3): 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wiborg, S. 2010. Swedish Free Schools: Do they Work? LLAKES Research Paper No. 18.Centre for learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.
   Google Scholar