Reliability of a shortened single-target implicit association Test (ST-IAT) as an implicit measure of attitudes towards inclusion. Replication and extension of “implicitly measuring attitudes towards inclusive Education: a new attitude Test based on single-target implicit associations” (Lüke and Grosche, 2018, European journal of special needs Education)

References

• Aust, F., and M. Barth 2022. Papaja: Prepare Reproducible APA Journal Articles with R Markdown. https://github.com/crsh/papaja.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (2): 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan, Y., and B. A. Nosek. 2014. “A Comparative Investigation of Seven Indirect Attitude Measures.” Behavior Research Methods 46 (3): 668–688. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0410-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. 2022. Tinylabels: Lightweight Variable Labels. https://cran.r-project.org/package=tinylabels.
   Google Scholar
• Bluemke, M., and M. Friese. 2008. “Reliability and Validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing Automatic Affect Towards Multiple Attitude Objects.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (6): 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börnert-Ringleb, M., A. Westphal, N. Zaruba, F. Gutmann, and M. Vock. 2020. “The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Inclusion, Beliefs About Teaching and Learning, and Subsequent Automatic Evaluations Amongst Student Teachers.” Frontiers in Education 5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.584464.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, A., S. J. Pijl, and A. Minnaert. 2011. “Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (3): 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 2022. Polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=polycor.
   Google Scholar
• Friese, M., W. Hofmann, and M. Schmitt. 2009. “‘When and Why Do Implicit Measures Predict Behaviour? Empirical Evidence for the Moderating Role of Opportunity, Motivation, and Process Reliance.” European Review of Social Psychology 19 (1): 285–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802556958.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., J. D. Houwer, and J. W. Sherman. 2020. “Twenty-Five Years of Research Using Implicit Measures.” Social Cognition 38 (Supplement): s1–s25. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s1.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., D. Keltner, S. Chen, and R. E. Nisbett. 2016. Social Psychology. fourth ed. New York: W. w. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Glashouwer, K. A., F. T. Y. Smulders, P. J. D. Jong, A. Roefs, and R. W. H. J. Wiers. 2013. “Measuring Automatic Associations: Validation of Algorithms for the Implicit Association Test (IAT) in a Laboratory Setting.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 44 (1): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohel, D. 2023. Officer: Manipulation of Microsoft Word and PowerPoint Documents. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=officer.
   Google Scholar
• Gohel, D., and P. Skintzos 2023. Flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=flextable.
   Google Scholar
• Gorges, J., J. Grumbach, S. A. Micheel, and P. Neumann. 2020. “Erfassung von Einstellungen zu Inklusion mit SACIE, EFI-L und KIESEL.” Diagnostica 66 (4): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000253.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., D. E. McGhee, and J. L. K. Schwartz. 1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (6): 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji. 2003. “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm: Correction to Greenwald Et Al. (2003.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (3): 481. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., B. Gawronski, T. Gschwendner, H. Le, and M. Schmitt. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (10): 1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. H. 2011. “Multi-State Models for Panel Data: The Msm Package for R.” Journal of Statistical Software 38 (8): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v038.i08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. 2023. Rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix.
   Google Scholar
• Krischler, M., J. J. W. Powell, and I. M. Pit-Ten Cate. 2019. “‘What is Meant by Inclusion? On the Effects of Different Definitions on Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education”.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 34 (5): 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1580837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, A., R. Luder, and M. Moretti. 2010. “Die Messung von Einstellungen zur Integration (EZI).” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 2 (3): 83–94. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2014/9350/pdf/ESP_2010_3_Kunz_Luder_Moretti_Die_Messung.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Limesurvey Gmb, H. 2023. LimeSurvey: An Open Source Survey Tool. Hamburg. https://www.limesurvey.org/de/.
   Google Scholar
• Lüke, T., and M. Grosche 2017. Professionsunabhängige Einstellungsskala zum Inklusiven Schulsystem (PREIS): Open Science Framework.
   Google Scholar
• Lüke, T., and M. Grosche. 2018a. “Implicitly Measuring Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A New Attitude Test Based on Single-Target Implicit Associations.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 33 (3): 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1334432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüke, T., and M. Grosche. 2018b. “‘What Do I Think About Inclusive Education? It Depends on Who is Asking. Experimental Evidence for a Social Desirability Bias in Attitudes Towards Inclusion”.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (1): 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1348548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., and H. Wickham 2023. Tibble: Simple Data Frames. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tibble.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Y. Bar-Anan, N. Sriram, J. Axt, A. G. Greenwald, and T. Denson. 2014. “Understanding and Using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended Scoring Procedures.” PloS One 9 (12): e110938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., and F. L. Smyth. 2007. “A Multitrait-Multimethod Validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and Explicit Attitudes are Related but Distinct Constructs.” Experimental Psychology 54 (1): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Richetin, J., G. Costantini, M. Perugini, F. Schönbrodt, and J. Pietschnig. 2015. “Should We Stop Looking for a Better Scoring Algorithm for Handling Implicit Association Test Data? Test of the Role of Errors, Extreme Latencies Treatment, Scoring Formula, and Practice Trials on Reliability and Validity.” PloS One 10 (6): e0129601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. 2006. “Ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modelling and Item Response Theory Analyses.” Journal of Statistical Software 17 (5): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, D., L. Egener, D. Laubenstein, and C. Melzer. 2020. “Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Measuring Subjective Definitions of Inclusion (FEDI).” International Journal of Inclusive Education 27 (4): 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1853256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, D., M. Scholz, A. Rank, and C. Donie. 2015. “Inclusive Beliefs and Self-Efficacy Concerning Inclusive Education Among German Teacher Trainees and Student Teachers.” Journal of Cognitive Education & Psychology 14 (3): 270–293. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.14.3.270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U. 2021. “The Implicit Association Test: A Method in Search of a Construct.” Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 16 (2): 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwab, S., and S. Seifert. 2015. “‘Einstellungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Pädagogikstudierenden zur schulischen Inklusion – Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Untersuchung.” Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung 5 (1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-014-0107-7.
   Google Scholar
• Seifried, S., and V. Heyl. 2016. “Konstruktion und Validierung eines Einstellungsfragebogens zu Inklusion für Lehrkräfte (EFI-L).” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 8 (1): 22–35. http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-118527.
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. 2010. “PsyToolkit: A Software Package for Programming Psychological Experiments Using Linux.” Behavior Research Methods 42 (4): 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. 2017. “PsyToolkit: A Novel Web-Based Method for Running Online Questionnaires and Reaction-Time Experiments.” Teaching of Psychology 44 (1): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Fourth). Springer. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2022. Stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., and J. Bryan 2023. Readxl: Read Excel Files. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., R. François, L. Henry, K. Müller, and D. Vaughan 2023. Dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., and L. Henry 2023. Purrr: Functional Programming Tools. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=purrr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., J. Hester, and J. Bryan 2023. Readr: Read Rectangular Text Data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., D. Vaughan, and M. Girlich 2023. Tidyr: Tidy messy data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr.
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, S., and C. Sahli Lozano. 2018. “Measuring Implicit Attitudes with the Inclusion ST-IAT: A Replication and Further Validation.” Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 16 (1): 59–73. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179966.pdf.
   Google Scholar