Serum Cystatin C as an Endogenous Marker of Renal Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

REFERENCES

• Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, Maccanus C, Smith J, Moffitt S. Measurement of muscle mass in humans: Validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983; 37: 478–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donadio C, Lucchesi A, Ardini M, Giordani R, Cystatin C. β2 microglobulin, andretinol binding proteins as indicators of glomerular filtration rate: Comparison with plasma creatinine. J Pharm Biom Anal. 2001; 24: 835–842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laterza OF, Price CP, Scott MG. Cystatin C: An improved estimator of glomerular filtration rate?. Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 699–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen J. Proteins in normal cerebrospinal fluid not found in serum. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1961; 107: 170–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: New insights into old concepts. Clin Chem. 1992; 38: 1933–1953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James GD, Sealey JE, Alderman M, Ljungman S, Mueller FB, Pecker MS, Laragh JH. A longitudinal study of urinary creatinine and creatinine clearance in normal subjects. Race, sex, and age differences. Am J Hypertens. 1988; 1: 124–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical practice guideline to define chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 39(Suppl. 1)S1–S266
   Google Scholar
• Froissart M, Rossert J, Jacquot C, Paillard M, Houillier P. Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 763–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio ED, Wang X, Greene T, Van Lente F, Hall PM. Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 459–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deinum J, Derkx FHM. Cystatin for estimation of glomerular filtration rate?. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1624–1625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randers E, Erlandsen EJ. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function: A review. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999; 37: 389–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll E, Botey A, Alvarez L, et al. Serum cystatin C as a new marker for noninvasive estimation of glomerular filtration rate and as a marker for early renal impairment. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 36: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron JS, Greger R. Renal function and testing of function. Oxford Textbook of Clinical Nephrology 2^nd, AM Davison, S Cameron, JP Grunfeld, DNS Kerr, E Ritz, CG Winearls. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo 1998; 1: 39–69
   Google Scholar
• Levey AS, Berg RL, Gassmann JJ, Hall PM, Walker WG. Creatinine filtration, secretion and excretion during progressive renal disease. Kidney Int. 1989; 36(Suppl. 27)S73–S80
   Google Scholar
• Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD. Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int. 1985; 28: 830–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int. 1990; 38: 167–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevil BG, Kilpatrick ES, Nichols SP, Maylor PW. Biological variation of cystatin C: Implication for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 1535–1539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Edwards RG, Wilkie M, White T, Grubb AO. Serum cystatin C measured by automated immunoassay: A more sensitive marker of changes in GFR than serum creatinine. Kidney Int. 1995; 47: 312–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos J, B ˘tabuc, Cimerman N, Brünner N. Serum cystatin C, a new marker of glomerular filtration rate, is increased during malignant progression. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 2556–2557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B ˘tabuc, Vrhovec L, M ˘tabuc-˘ilih, Cizej TE. Improved prediction of decreased creatinine clearance by serum cystatin C: Use in cancer patients before and during chemotherapy. Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 193–197
   Google Scholar
• Finney H, Williams AH, Price CP. Serum cystatin C in patients with myeloma. Clin Chim Acta. 2001; 309: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filler G, Witt I, Priem F, Ehrich JHH, Jung K. Are cystatin and beta microglobulin better markers than serum creatinine for prediction of a normal glomerular filtration rate in pediatric subjects?. Clin Chem. 1997; 43: 1077–1078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Cystatin C—a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics. 1998; 101: 875–881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40: 221–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen SA, Johannesen IL, Erlandsen EJ, Abrahamsen J, Randers E. Serum cystatin C as a marker of the renal function in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40: 524–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirtas S, Bozbas A, Akbay A, Yavuz Y, Karaca L. Diagnostic value of serum cystatin C for evaluation of hepatorenal syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2001; 311: 81–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussap M, Dalla Vestra M, Fioretto P, et al. Cystatin C is more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of glomerular filtration in type 2 diabetic patients. Kidney Int. 2002; 61: 1453–1461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIsaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Thomas MC, Premaratne E, Panagiotopoulos S, Smith TJ, Poon A, Jenkins MA, Ratnaike SI, Power DA, Jerums G. The accuracy of cystatin C and commonly used creatinine-based methods for detecting moderate and mild chronic kidney disease in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007; 24(4)443–448
   Google Scholar
• Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impaired kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21: 1855–1862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliser D, Franek E, Joest M, Block S, Mutschler E, Ritz E. Changes of renal function in the elderly-influence of hypertension and cardiac function. Kidney Int. 1997; 51: 1196–1204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliser D, Ritz E. Serum cystatin C concentration as a marker of renal dysfunction in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37: 79–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell MB, Dwinell AM, Bannick-Mohrland SD. Predictive performance of equations to estimate creatinine clearance in hospitalized elderly patients. Ann Pharmacother. 1992; 26: 627–635
   Google Scholar
• Wasen E, Suominen P, Isoaho R, et al. Serum cystatin C as a marker of kidney dysfunction in an elderly population. Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 1138–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Noortgate NJ, Janssens WH, Delanghe JR, Afschrift MB, Lameire NH. Serum cystatin C concentration compared with other markers of glomerular filtration rate in the old old. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002; 50: 1278–1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojs R, Bevc S, Antolinc B, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in the elderly. Int J Clin Pharm. 2004; 24(2/3)49–54
   Google Scholar
• Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18: 2024–2031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyhse-Andesen J, Schmidt C, Nordin G, Andersson B, Nilsson-Ehle P, Lindstrom V, Grubb A. Serum cystatin C, determined by a rapid, automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric method, is a better marker than serum creatinine for glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem. 1994; 40: 1921–1926
   Google Scholar
• Grubb A, Bjork J, Lindstrom V, Strerner G, Bondesson P, Nyman U. A cystatin C-based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2005; 65: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar