1,524
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Study

Reducing the occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience about CQI

, , &
Pages 628-633 | Received 20 Jul 2017, Accepted 23 Oct 2017, Published online: 06 Nov 2018

References

  • Öğünç G. Videolaparoscopy with omentopexy: a new technique to allow placement of a catheter for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Surg Today. 2001;31:942–944.
  • Wu B, Wang M, Zhao HP. Effect of continuous quality improvement on the prevention of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Chin J Blood Purif. 2010;9:534–537.
  • Wang X, Wang T. Effect of continuous quality improvement (CQI) on hypertension management in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. J Peking Univ (Health Sci). 2004;36:190–193.
  • Xie JY, Chen N, Ren H, et al. Prospective studies on applications of a two-cuff Swan neck catheter and a Tenckhoff catheter to Chinese CAPD patients. Clin Nephrol. 2009;72:373–379.
  • Hryszko T, Suchowierska E, Rydzewska-Rosolowska A, et al. Factors associated with early catheter-related complications in peritoneal dialysis. Adv Med Sci. 2012;57:84–87.
  • Singh N, Davidson I, Minhajuddin A, et al. Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients. J Vasc Access. 2010;11:316–322.
  • Wang J, Zhang H, Liu J, et al. Implementation of a continuous quality improvement program reduces the occurrence of peritonitis in PD. Ren Fail. 2014;36:1029–1032.
  • Hu J, Zhang H, Ji Y, et al. Continuous quality improvement has reduced the incidence of peritoneal dialysis catheter migration and plugging. Int J Pathol Clin Med. 2012;32:287–291.
  • Yu Y, Ji D. Peritoneal dialysis tube method and complications. J Nephrol Dialy Tranplant. 2008;17:175–178.
  • Yang D, Jia R, Shao J, et al. 11 cases of peritoneal catheter malposition reason analysis and processing. Acta Acad Med Hubei. 1999;20:47–48.
  • Peppelenbosch A, van Kuijk WH, Bouvy ND, et al. Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications. NDT Plus. 2008;1:iv23–iv28.
  • Sun F, Dong Y, Xuan Z, et al. Ultrasonic detection of peritoneal dialysis catheter abdominal segment end position and complications of catheterization. Chin J Blood Purif. 2008;7:286–287.
  • Chen XM. Complications of peritoneal dialysis. In: Peritoneal Dialysis Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Beijing: Chinese People's Military Medical Press; 2010; p. 72–95.
  • Li J, Peng Y, Zhou X, et al. To the upper border of the pubic symphysis for peritonealdialysis catheters surface markers. J Chin Physician. 2005;7:229–230.
  • Zhang L, Liu J, Shu J, et al. Low-site peritoneal catheter implantation decreases tip migration and omental wrapping. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31:202–204.
  • Yang PJ, Lee CY, Yeh CC, et al. Mini-laparotomy implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: outcome and rescue. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30:513–518.
  • Hwang SJ, Chang JM, Chen HC, et al. Smaller insertion angle of Tenckhoff catheter increases the chance of catheter migration in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int. 1998;18:433–435.