Measuring Functional Integration by Identifying the Trip Chains and the Profiles of Cross-Border Workers: Empirical Evidences from Luxembourg

References

• Albert, M., and L. Brock. 1996. Debordering the World of States: New Spaces in International Relations. New Political Science 18, no. 1: 69–106. doi: 10.1080/07393149608429765
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. 1996. Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., L. O’Dowd, and T.M. Wilson. 2003. New Borders for a Changing Europe: Cross-Border Cooperation and Governance. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Andreas, P., and T.J. Biersteker. 2003. The Rebordering of North America: Integration and Exclusion in a New Security Context. New-York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bassand, M. 2001. Métropoles et métropolisation [Metropolises and Metropolisation]. In Enjeux de la sociologie urbaine [Challenges of Urban Sociology], eds. M. Bassand, V. Kaufmann, and D. Joye, 3–16. Lausanne: PPUR.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, F. 2005. Développement de l’emploi transfrontalier au Luxembourg et portrait sociodémographique des frontaliers [Development of Cross-Border Employment in Luxembourg and Socio-Demographic Portrait of Cross-Border Workers]. CEPS/INSTEAD: coll. Population & Emploi [Population & Employment] 8: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, S., and P. Gerber. 2009. Les déplacements domicile-travail: en voiture, en train ou à pied? [Travel to and from Work: By Car, Train or Walk?] CEPS/INSTEAD, Vivre au Luxembourg [Living in Luxembourg] 53: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, S., and P. Gerber. 2012. Structure des mobilités locales et reconfiguration des espaces de vie transfrontaliers luxembourgeois [Structure of Local Mobilities and Reconfiguration of Luxembourg Cross-Border Living Spaces]. In Le travail frontalier au sein de la Grande Région Saar-Lor- Lux: Pratiques, enjeux et perspectives [Cross-Border Work in the Greater Region Saar-Lor-Lux: Practices, Challenges and Prospects], eds. B. Rachid and I. Pigeron-Piroth, 313–32. Nancy: Editions Universitaires de Lorraine.
   Google Scholar
• Cauvin, C., F. Escobar, and A. Serradj. 2008. Cartographie Thématique 3. Méthodes quantitatives et transformations attributaires [Thematic Cartography 3. Quantitative Methods and Attributive Transformations]. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Chardonnel, S. 2001. La time-geography: les individus dans le temps et dans l’espace [Time-Geography: Individuals in Time and Space]. In Modèles en analyse spatiale [Models in Spatial Analysis], ed. L. Sanders, 129–56. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. 2005. As Borders Bend. Transnational Spaces on the Pacific. Lanham: Rim.Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P. 1999. Cities in Competition: Articulating the Gains from Integration. Urban Studies 36, no. 1: 843–64. doi: 10.1080/0042098993240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A.P. 2000. Signifying Identities. Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contrasted Values. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelis, E. 2012. Belgian Daily Mobility. Beldam Rapport. www.mobilit.fgov.be/beldam.
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, G., and T. Richardson. 2005. The Europeanization of Spatial Strategy: Shaping Regions and Spatial Justice through Governmental Ideas. International Planning Studies 10, no. 3–4: 201–18. doi: 10.1080/13563470500378549
   Google Scholar
• Deboe, P., C. Grasland, and A. Healy. 1999. Spatial Integration, Strand 1.4. Paris: Study Programme on European Spatial planning.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., F. Durand, C. Sohn, and O. Walther. 2013. Comparing Cross-Border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: Towards a Functional Typology, Journal of Borderlands Studies 28, no. 2: 221–37. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrovova, B. 2008. Re-Making of Europe’s Borders Through the European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of Borderlands Studies 23, no. 1: 53–68. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2008.9695688
   Google Scholar
• Diop, L. 2012. Par delà les frontières, les marchés de la métropole luxembourgeoise [Beyond the Borders, the Markets of the Luxembourg Metropolis]. Études Foncières [Property Studies] 159: 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. 2014. Challenges of Cross-Border Spatial Planning in the Metropolitan Regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning Practice & Research 29, no. 2: 113–32. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2014.896148
   Google Scholar
• Enaux, C., and P. Gerber. 2008. Les déterminants de la représentation transnationale du bassin de vie. Une approche fondée sur l’attachement au lieu des frontaliers luxembourgeois [The Determinants of the Transnational Representation of the Living Space. An Approach Based on Attachment Place of Luxembourg Cross-Border Workers]. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine [Regional Economy Review] 5: 725–52.
   Google Scholar
• European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON). 2007. Study on Urban Functions. ESPON project 1.4.3. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON). 2010. Metroborder. Cross-Border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. 2012. Advancement in Conceptualizing Cross-Border Daily Mobility: The Benelux Context in the European Union. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 12, no. 2: 178–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, P., and J.-Y. Bienvenue. 2005. Echantillonnage spatial et difficultés de production de données d’enquête à l’échelle intra-urbaine: l’exemple de la Ville de Luxembourg [Spatial Sampling and Difficulties in Producing Survey Data at the Intra-urban Scale: The Example of the City of Luxembourg]. In Techniques d’enquête. Actualité scientifique de la méthode et des outils [Survey Methods. Scientific News for the Method], eds. T. Ramadier and A.C. Bronner, 2–22. Strasbourg: CNRS & CEMAGREF, ISBN: 2-9526014-0-2.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R.G., and R.J. Stimson. 1997. Spatial Behavior. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. 1970. What About People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association 24, no. 1: 7–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P.A., and G. Serin. 2007. Integration Strategies and Barriers to Co-operation in Cross-Border Regions: Case Study of the Øresund Region. Journal of Borderlands Studies 22, no. 2: 39–56. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2007.9695676
   Google Scholar
• Horton, F.E., and D.R. Reynolds. 1971. Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behavior. Economic Geography, 47, no.1: 36–48. doi: 10.2307/143224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.P. 2004. GIS Methods in Time-Geographic Research: Geocomputation and Geovisualization of Human Activity Patterns. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 86, no. 4: 267–80. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00167.x
   Google Scholar
• Lebart, L., M. Piron, and A. Morineau. 2000. Statistique Exploratoire Multidimensionnelle [Exploratory Multidimensional Statistics]. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Camille. 2007. Mobilités, traces et frontières dans l’Afrique des Grands Lacs [Mobility, Tracks and Borders in Great Lakes Region of Africa]. Paper Presented at the 32nd Africa International Conference, Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Le jeannic, T. 2010. La mobilité des Français, panorama issu de l’enquête nationale transports et déplacements 2008 [The Mobility of the French, Resulting from the National Transport and Travel Survey, 2008]. Final Report Service de l’Observation et des Statistiques (SOeS) du Commissariat Général au Développement Durable (CGDD) [Department of Observation and Statistics (SOeS) of the General Commissariat for Sustainable Development (CGDD)], Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, S., and P. Gerber. 2012. Residential and Cross-Border Mobility: A Catalyst of Social Polarization?. In Luxembourg: An Emerging Cross-Border Metropolitan Region, ed. C. Sohn, 161–84. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, O. 1996. Border People. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• MKW Wirtschaftsforchung GmbH, Empirica Kft. 2009. Scientific Report on the Mobility of Cross-Border Workers within the EU-27/EEA/EFTA Countries, Final Report. Report commissioned by European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2006. The Lines that Continue to Separate us: Borders in our “Borderless” World. Progress In Human Geography 30, no. 2: 143–61. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák, J., and L. Sýkora. 2007. A City in Motion: Time-Space Activity and Mobility Patterns of Suburban Inhabitants and the Structuration of the Spatial Organization of the Prague Metropolitan Area. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 89, no. 2: 147–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigeron-Piroth, I., and M. Schneider. 2009. Une aire résidentielle transfrontalière en expansion [An Expanding Cross-Border Residential Area]. In Atlas du Luxembourg [Luxembourg Atlas], eds. P. Bousch, T. Chilla, P. Gerber, O. Klein, C. Schultz, C. Sohn, and D. Wiktorin, 88–9. Köln: Emons-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Primerano, F., M. Taylor, L. Pitaksringkarn, and P. Tisato. 2008. Defining and Understanding Trip Chaining Behaviour, Transportation 35, no. 1: 55–72. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9134-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitel, B. 2011. La frontière internationale, objet sémique, processus multidimensionnel, interface signifiante [The International Boundary, Semic Object, Multidimensional Process, Signifying Interface], CEPS/INSTEAD, Working Paper Series, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, F., G. Drevon, and P. Gerber. 2012. La mobilité des frontaliers du Luxembourg: dynami- ques et perspectives [Luxembourg Cross-Border Workers Mobility: Dynamics and Prospects], Les Cahiers du CEPS/INSTEAD [The CEPS/INSTEAD Notebooks], Hors-Série, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Schönfelder, S., and K.W. Axhausen. 2010. Urban Rhythms and Travel Behaviour: Spatial and Temporal Phenomena of Daily Travel. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. 2009. Luxembourg dans la Grande Région [Luxembourg within the Greater Region]. In Der Luxembourg Atlas / Atlas du Luxembourg [Luxembourg Atlas], eds. P. Bousch, T. Chilla, P. Gerber, O. Klein, C. Schultz, C. Sohn, and D. Wiktorin, 12–13. Köln: Emons-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. 2012. Luxembourg: An Emerging Cross-Border Metropolitan Region. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. 2014. Modelling Cross-Border Integration: The Role of Borders as a Resource. Geopolitics 19, no. 3: 587–608. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., B. Reitel, and O. Walther. 2009. Cross-Border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: The Case of Luxembourg, Basel and Geneva. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 27, no. 5: 922–39. doi: 10.1068/c0893r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, B., and M. Van Der Velde. 2013. Cross-Border Differences and Unfamiliarity: Shopping Mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion. European Planning Studies 21, no. 1: 5–23. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathman, J.G., and K.J. Dueker. 1995. Understanding Trip Chaining, Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes. Transportation Research Record 28, no. 3: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. 2000. An Overview of European Geographical Research on Borders and Border Regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 15, no. 1: 57–83. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542
   Google Scholar
• Zanardelli, M., F. Schmitz, G. Drevon, A.S. Genevois, and G. Schuller. 2014. Les activités et les dépenses des frontaliers au Luxembourg [Activities and Spendings of Cross-Border Workers in Luxembourg]. In Cohésion sociale et territoriale au Luxembourg: regards croisés [Social and Territorial Cohesion in Luxembourg: Cross-Views], eds. E. Marlier, J. Brosius, V. Dautel, and A. Decoville, 173–88. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar