Analyzing how a Social Base Impacts Economic Development and Competitiveness Strategies in a Cross-border Context: the Case of Region Laredo

References

• Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 1995. Institutional Issues for the European Regions: From Markets and Plans to Socioeconomics and Powers of Association. Economy and Society 24, no. 1: 41–66. doi: 10.1080/03085149500000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arreola, D. 1996. Border-City Idee Fixe. Geographical Review 86, no. 3: 356–369. doi: 10.2307/215499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., R. Boschma, and P. Cooke. 2006. Constructing Regional Advantage: Principles– Perspectives–Policies. DG Research Expert Group on “Constructing Regional Advantage.” Rapporteur Professor Asheim. Final Report on February.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., and L. Coenen. 2005. Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. Research Policy 34, no. 8: 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., and M. Gertler. 2005. The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P. 1986. Milieux Innovateurs en Europe. Paris: GREMI.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, G., ed. 1987. Mercato e Forze Locali: Il Distretto Industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Brusco, S. 1986. Small Firms and Industrial Districts: The Experience of Italy. In New Firms and Regional Development in Europe, ed. D. Keeble and E. Weaver, 184–201. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Brusco, S. 1992. Small Firms and the Provision of Real Services. In Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, ed. F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger, 177–196. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and B. Burgess. 2002. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 1992. Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum 23: 365–82. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2001. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 4: 945–74. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2002. What we Should Know about Regional Systems of Innovation. Technology in Society 24: 243–63. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Estensoro, M. 2012. Local Networks and Socially Innovative Territories. The Case of the Basque Region and Goierri County. Doctoral Dissertation., Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, País Vasco.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., ed. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith, M., C. Werker, and M. Vojnic. 2014. Tracing the Dimension in Innovation Networks—From Conceptualization to Empirical Testing. In The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks, ed. R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, and F. Boekema, 121–39. Aachen, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, L.L., and O. Bjarnar. 2014. Social Fields of Knowledge Flows: A Regional Cluster in a Global Context. In The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks, ed. R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, and F. Boekema, 157–76. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. 2010. Community Development Along the Border: An Instrument for the Development of the Cross-Border Region? The Journal of Cross-Border Studies in Ireland Spring, no. 5: 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., and M. Schwarz. 2010. Social Innovation. Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund ZWE der TU- Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H. 1998. The Development of Cross-Border Economic Relations. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. 2002. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., and P. Maskell. 2002. The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering. Environment and Planning A 34, no. 3: 429–49. doi: 10.1068/a3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and A. Malmberg. 1999. Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 167–85. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 1997. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies 31, no. 5: 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and J. Nussbaumer. 2005. The Social Region: Beyond the Territorial Dynamics of the Learning Economy. European Urban and Regional Studies 12, no. 1: 45–64. doi: 10.1177/0969776405048500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and F. Sekia. 2003. Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies 37, no. 3: 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., et al. 2005. Social Innovation, Governance and Community Building. EC FP6, Final Report. Lille/Newcastle, IFRESI and GURU.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., et al. 2013. Social Innovation: What it is, Why it Matters and How it can be Accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship - Oxford Said Business School, Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mutti, A. 1998. Capitale sociale e sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review 23, no. 2: 242–66. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namey, E., G. Guest, L. Thairu, and L. Johnson. 2008. Data Reduction Techniques for Large Qualitative Data Sets. In Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research, 137–162. Rowman Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. 2003. Cross-Border Regions in Europe Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border Co-Operation. European Urban and Regional Studies 10, no. 2: 153–71. doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1996. Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies and Regional Policy. International Regional Science Review 19: 85–94. doi: 10.1177/016001769601900208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, R. n.p., n.d. French Statesman, Founder of European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, R.J., R.R. Stough, B.H. Roberts. 2006. Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Planning Strategy. Rev. ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and A.J. Scott. 1988. The Geographical Foundations and Social Regulation of Flexible Production Complexes. In The Power of Geography, ed. J. Wolch and M. Dear, 21–40. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and R. Walker. 1983. The Theory of Labour and the Theory of Location. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 7, no. 1: 1–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1983.tb00581.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach. Research Policy 34: 1203–19. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. 2006. Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems, SRE – Discussion Papers, 2006/05, Institut für Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft, WU Vienna University of Economics andBusiness, Vienna [online] http://epub.wu.ac.at.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2014. Competitiveness and Innovation: Questioning the Concepts and Their Implications for Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D.A. 2002. Knowledge, Learning and Social Capital in Ontario’s ICT Clusters. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Toronto, May (http://www.utoronto.ca/progris/pdf files/ Ontario%27s%20ICT%20Clusters.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D.A., and T. Creutzberg. 2003. Community Participation and Multilevel Governance in Economic Development Policy. Toronto: Ontario Government, Panel on the Role of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar