Border, Development and Dispossessed Agency

References

• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, W. 2013. “I am from Busia!”: Everyday Trading and Health Service Provision at the Kenya-Uganda Border as Place-Making Activities. Journal of Borderland Studies 28, no. 3: 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, D. 2021. The Republic’s Inner Borders: Rethinking French Banlieues Through Critical Border Studies. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–20. accessed April 11, 2022 at 5.43 am. doi:10.1080/08865655.2021.1913066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amilhat Szary, A., and F. Giraut, eds. 2015. Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders. by New York and London, Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 1996. The Shifting Stage of Politics: New Medieval and Postmodern Territorialities? Environment and Planning: Society and Space 14: 133–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and M. Tazzioli. 2020. Biopolitics Multiple: Migration, Extraction, Subtraction. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 48, no. 2: 198–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. 2002. Politics and the Other Scene. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, T. 2005. Sociology and Development. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M., I. Garcia-Blanco, K. Moore, and M. Morani. 2015. Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325763556_Press_Coverage_of_the_Refugee_and_Migrant_Crisis_in_the_EU_A_Content_Analysis_of_Five_European_Countries, accessed July 10, 2022 at 12.50 am.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E. 2005. Theorising Border: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics 10: 633–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E. 2011. Special Section: Borders, Borderlands and Theory: An Introduction. Geopolitics 16, no. 1: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., and A. Dhar. 2010. Dislocation and Resettlement in Development: From Third World to the World of Third. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. 2018. Borderline Canadianness: Border Crossing and Everyday nationalism in Naigara. Journal of American Ethnic History 37, no. 2. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A530159418&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=34e51788. accessed April, 12, 2022 at 9.44 am
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R. 2017. Values and Power Conflicts in Framing Borders and Borderlands: The 2013 Reform of EU Schengen Governance. Journal of Borderlands Studies 34, no. 5: 685–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Conversation. 2022. Ukrain: How Citizenship and Race Play out in Refugees’ Movement in Europe, March 11, accessed April, 02, 2022 at 16.53 pm. https://theconversation.com/ukraine-how-citizenship-and-race-play-out-in-refugees-movements-in-europe-178118.
   Google Scholar
• Croxton, D. 1999. The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty. The International History Review. September 21, no. 3: 569–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davitti, D. 2018. Bio-Political Borders and the State of Exception in the European Migration Crisis. The European Journal of International Law 29, no. 4: 1173–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleixhe, M. 2018. Bio political Sovereignty and Borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies, PP 1–16 pp. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08865655.2017.1414623 accessed March, 18, 2022 at 8.02 am.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, R. 2002. Models and Methods in Development- Induced Displacement. Development and Change 33, no. 4: 709–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2007. Governmentality, Calculation, Territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2007 25: 562–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. 2002. Revisiting Westphalia, Discovering Post-Westphalia. The Journal of Ethics 6, no. 4: 311–52.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, J. 2005. Point: The Westphalia Legacy and the Modern Nation State. International Social Science Review 80, no. ¾: 156–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2009. Is Another Life Possible? Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 5: 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, J. 1988. Introductory Notes for a Post-Modern Value Agenda in John Fekete ed. Life After Post-Modernism: Essays on Value and Culture. London: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris-Rotman, A., and Przemysl. 2022. They called Ukraine Home. But they Faced Violence and Racism When They Tried to Flee, The Time, https://time.com/6153276/ukraine-refugees-racism accessed April, 02, 2022 at 17.52.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1985. Mitchel Foucault: A “Young Conservative”? Ethics. October 96, no. 1: 165–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, M., and R. Zaborowski. 2017. Media Coverage of the “Refugee Crisis”: A Cross-European Perspective, Council of European Report DG1. 03. accessed April, 04, 2022. https://rm.coe.int/1680706b00.
   Google Scholar
• Ghervas, S., and D. Armitage. 2020. From Westphalia to Enlightened Peace, 1648–1815. In A Cultural History of Peace in the Age of Enlightenment (1648–1815), 1–18. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1989. Taking Aim at the Heart of the Present: On Foucault’s Lecture on Kant’s What is Enlightenment? In Jürgen Habermas, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historical Debate, ed. and trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen, 173–81. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., and S. Ben-Habib. 1981. New German Critique. Winter. No. 22: 3–14, Special Issue on Modernism.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, M.G. 2009. Calculable Territory and the West German Census Boycott Movements of the 1980. Political Geography 28, no. 1: 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, L.A., and C. Sohn. 2014. The Cross-Border Metropolis in a Global Age: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence from the US–Mexico and European Border Regions. Global Society 28, no. 4: 441–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., ed. 2013. Transcultural Cities: Border-Crossing and Placemaking. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, B. 1991. Habermas on Foucault: Critical Remarks. Acta Sociologica 34: 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.N. 2009. The Moral Law as Causal Law. In Kant’s Groundwork on Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Jens Timmermann, 82–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. and Johnson, C. eds. 2014. Placing the Border in Everyday Life, London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kajta, J., and E. Opilowska. 2021. The Impact of Covid on Structure and Agency in a Borderland: The Case of Two Twin Towns in Central Europe, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08865655.2021.1996259.
   Google Scholar
• Kallenberg, B. 2011. “The Master Argument of MacIntyre's ‘After Virtue’” Religious Studies Faculty Publications. 66. accessed July 30, 2021 at 20.50 pm Delhi. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/rel_fac_pub/66.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, E. 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary Gregor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2009. Clarifying the Foucault-Habermas Debate: Morality, Ethics, and ‘Normative Foundations. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35, no. 3: 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. 2021. New Directions at the Post-Globalization Border. Journal of Borderlands Studies 36, no. 5: 713–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J.P. 2015. A Historical View on the Study of Borders. In Introduction to Border Studies, eds. S. Sevastianov, J. Laine, and A. Kireev, 14–32. Vladivostok: Dalnauka.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J.P. 2016. The Multi-Scalar Production of Borders. Geopolitics 21, no. 3: 465–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J.P. 2021. Beyond Borders: Towards the Ethics of Unbounded Inclusiveness. Journal of Borderland Studies. accessed February, 27, 2022 at 8.30 am. doi:10.1080/08865655.2021.1924073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, M., J. Mahoney, and M. vom. Hau. 2006. Colonialism and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Spanish and British Colonies. American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 5: 1412–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2014. Value Theory: A Research Into Subjectivity. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd ed. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, M. 2021. News Media Representation on EU Immigration Before Brexit: The ‘Euro Ripper’ Case, News Media Representation on EU Immigration Before Brexit: The ‘Euro-Ripper’ Case. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8: 11. accessed April, 04, 2022 at 11 pm. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00687-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2013. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, James. 1994. The Passion of Michel Foucault. New York and London: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Minca, C. 2006. Giorgio Agamben and the New Biopolitical Nomos. Geogr. Ann 88 B, no. 4: 387–403.
   Google Scholar
• Minca, C, A Rijke, P Pallister-Wilkins, M Tazzioli, D Vigneswaran, H Van Houtum, and A Van Uden. 2021. Rethinking the Biopolitical: Borders, Refugees, Mobilities. . . Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, accessed on March 18, 2022 at 9.11 am https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2399654420981389.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, B. 2016. Recounting double exception in Kalinganagar. International Journal for Migration and Border Studies 2, no. 2: 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, B. 2019. Ecologic. Border and Deterritorialisation, 113–32. in N. Uddin and N. Chowdhory eds. Deterritorialised Identity and Transborder Movement in South Asia, Singapore, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, B., and B. Verma. 2021. Land Acquisition, Movement Actors and Federalism: The Anti-POSCO Movement in Odisha. In (2021) New Dimensions in Federal Discourse in India, ed. R Saxena, 89–105. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muguruza, C.C. 2020. Everyday Humanitarian Diplomacy: Experiences from Border areas. accessed March 28, 2022 at 11.30 pm https://www.cmi.no/publications/7171-everyday-humanitarian-diplomacy-experiences-from-border-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Nail, T. 2013. The Crossroads of Power: Michel Foucault and the US/Mexico Border Wall. Foucault Studies 1, no. 15: 110–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nandy, A. 2010. State. In Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, ed. Wolfgang Sach, 295–307. London and New York: Zed books.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2003. On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies 18, no. 1: 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., and A. Paasi. 1998. Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22, no. 2: 186–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, P. 2016. Placing Borders in Development. Geopolitics 21, no. 3: 483–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, Liam. 2010. From ‘Borderless World’ to ‘World of Borders’: ‘Bringing History Back in’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, no. 2010: 1031–50.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2009. Bounded Spaces in a ‘Borderless World’: Border Studies, Power and the Anatomy of Territory. Journal of Power 2, no. 2: 213–34.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, C., and C. Rumford. 2013. The Politics of (Un)fixity and the Vernacularisation of Borders. Global Society 27, no. 3: 267–82.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. 2003. Engaging Reason on the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W.C. 2003. Risks and Rights: The Causes, Consequences, and Challenges of Development-Induced Displacement, An Occasional paper, The Brookings Institution-SAIS Project on Internal Displacement, accessed April 11, 2022 at 2.59 am https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/didreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rovisco, M. 2010. Reframing Europe and the Global: Conceptualizing the Border in Cultural Encounters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, no. 6: 1015–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M.B. 2008. When the Exception Becomes the Rule: Borders, Sovereignty, and Citizenship. Citizenship Studies 12, no. 4: 365–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, K. 2007. Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality and Post-Colonial Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schalow, F. 2012. Kant and Sources of Value. In Value: Sources and Readings on a key Concept of the Globalised World, ed. Ivo De G, 131–47. Leiden: Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.W., and C. Sohn. 2018. Place-making and the Bordering of Urban Space: Interpreting the Emergence of New Neighbourhoods in Berlin and Budapest. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–17. doi:10.1177/0969776418764577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, T. 2009. Ghettoizing a Matriarch and a City: An Everyday Story from the Palestinian/Israeli Borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies 24, no. 3: 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, D.L. 1989. State Nation and Ethnicity: Experience of Third World Countries, Economic and Political Weekly. March 25: 615–26.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, V. 2017. Unauthorised Migration Beyond Structure/Agency? Acts, Interventions, Effects Politics 37, no. 3: 254–27.
   Google Scholar
• Szary, A.A., and F. Giraut. 2015. Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Szytniewsky, B., and B. Spierings. 2014. Encounters with Otherness: Implications of (Un)familiarity for Daily Life in Borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies 29, no. 3: 339–51.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2021. ‘Keeping on the move without letting pass’: Rethinking biopolitics through mobility. in Minca et al Rethinking the biopolitical: Borders, Refugees, Mobilities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2399654420981389 accessed on 18.03.2022 at 8.54 am.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., and N. De Genova. 2020. Kidnapping Migrants as a Tactic of Border Enforcement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38, no. 5: 867–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirlwall, A.P. 1983. Development with Special Reference to Developing Economies. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow. 2015. Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tshabalala, X. 2017. Hyenas of the Limpopo: “Illicit Labour Recruiting,” Assisted Border Crossings, and the Social Politics of Movement Across South Africa’s Border with Zimbabwe. Journal of Borderlands Studies 34, no. 3: 1–18. accessed April, 11, 2022 at 11.24 pm. https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/08865655.2017.1348910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyreman, T. 2019. Everyday Borders in Calais: The Globally Intimate Injustices of Segregation. Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/24626/ accessed March 27, 2022 at 5.33 am.).
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. 2010. Human Blacklisting: The Global Apartheid of the EU’s External Border Regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 957–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H., and T. van Naerssen. 2002. Bordering, Ordering and Othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 93, no. 2: 125–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houtum, Henk, and Annelies van Uden. 2021. The Birth of The Paper Prison. The global inequality trap of visa borders in Minca, C., Rijke, A., Pallister-Wilkins, P., Tazzioli, M., Vigneswaran, D., van Houtum, H., and van Uden, A. (2021). Rethinking the biopolitical: Borders, refugees, mobilities … . Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2399654420981389 accessed on 18.03.2022 at 9.11 am.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Williams, N. 2009. The Generalised Bio-Political Border? Re-Conceptualising the Limits of Sovereign Power. Review of International Studies 35: 729–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Williams, N. 2015. Europe’s Border Crisis Bio-Political Security and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneswaran, D. 2020. Europe has Never Been Modern: Recasting Historical Narratives of Migration Control. International Political Sociology 14, no. 1: 2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneswaran, D. 2021. Myanmar and the moral cleansing of deportation and abandonment in Minca, C., Rijke, A., Pallister-Wilkins, P., Tazzioli, M., Vigneswaran, D., van Houtum, H., and van Uden, A. (2021). Rethinking the biopolitical: Borders, refugees, mobilities … . Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, accessed March 18, 2022 at 9.11 am. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2399654420981389.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneswaran, D., and J. Quirk, eds. 2015. Mobility Makes States Migration and Power in Africa. Philadelphia: University Of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, E.R. 2016. Constructing a “Wall”: Discursive Fields, Social Movements, and the Politics of the [Wall/Barrier/Fence]. Journal of Borderland Studies 31, no. 3: 305–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., G. Wemyss, and K. Cassidymitri. 2017. Everyday Bordering, Belonging and the Reorientation of British Immigration Legislation. Sociology 52, no. 2: 228–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zeveleva, O. 2017. Biopolitics, Borders, and Refugee Camps: Excercising Sovereign Power Over Non-Members of the State. The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 45, no. 1: 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar