Migration Control as Communication? Voluntary Returns, Information Campaigns and the Justification of Contested Migration/Border Governance

Bibliography

• Abizadeh, A. 2008. Democratic theory and border coercion: No right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory 36, no. 1: 37–65. doi:10.1177/0090591707310090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achiume, E.T. 2019. Migration as decolonization. Stanford Law Review 71, no. 6: 1509–1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpes, J.M. 2016. Brokering High-Risk Migration and Illegality in West Africa. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. 2017. Rescued and caught: The humanitarian-security nexus at Europe’s frontiers. In The Borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, ed. N. De Genova, 64–94. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, K.-O. 1999. Openly strategic uses of language: A transcendental-pragmatic perspective (A second attempt to think with Habermas against Habermas). In Habermas. A Critical Reader, ed. P. Dews, 272–290. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakewell, O., and C. Sturridge. 2021. Extreme risk makes the journey feasible: Decision-making amongst migrants in the horn of Africa. Social Inclusion 9, no. 1: 186–195. doi:10.17645/si.v9i1.3653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. 2010. At the borders of citizenship: A democracy in translation? European Journal of Social Theory 13, no. 3: 315–322. doi:10.1177/1368431010371751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. 2015. Border protests: The role of civil society in transforming border control. In Rethinking Border Control for a Globalizing World: A Preferred Future, ed. L. Weber, 133–152. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belim, C. 2020. Refugees and migrants in public campaigns: Being a voice for the voiceless. Comunicação e Sociedade 38: 79–105. DOI: 10.17231/comsoc.38(2020).2553.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L.M. 2021. ‘They know the procedure; they just don’t know when we will come’: Uncovering the practice of unannounced deportations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, no. 15: 3473–3491. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1894912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudou, B. 2022. Representing non-citizens: A proposal for the inclusion of all affected interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2062216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brändle, V.K. 2022. Well informed? EU governments’ digital information campaigns for (Potential) migrants. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. doi:10.1080/15562948.2022.2046896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, J.-P., and A. Beyer. 2019. “Everyone Wants to Leave”. Transit Migration from Khartoum—The Role of Information and Social Media Campaigns. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2008. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616, no. 1: 78–93. doi:10.1177/0002716207311877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleton, L., and S. Chauvin. 2020. Performing freedom in the Dutch deportation regime: Bureaucratic persuasion and the enforcement of ‘voluntary return’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46, no. 1: 297–313. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1593819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleton, L., and R. Schweitzer. 2021. ‘Our aim is to assist migrants in making a well-informed decision’: How return counsellors in Austria and the Netherlands manage the aspirations of unwanted non-citizens. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, no. 17: 3846–3863. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1935813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, P. 2000. Philosophies of Exclusion. Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, P. 2014. Beyond reason: The philosophy and politics of immigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17, no. 5: 503–520. doi:10.1080/13698230.2014.919058.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, A., and V. Lawson. 2020. Humanitarianism as conflicted care: Managing migrant assistance in EU assisted voluntary return policies. Political Geography 79. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2013. Spectacles of migrant “illegality”: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36, no. 7: 1180–1198. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.783710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, S., and P. Dannecker. 2017. Managing migration with stories? The IOM ‘i am a migrant’ campaign. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik/Austrian Journal of Development Studies 33, no. 1: 75–101. doi:10.20446/jep-2414-3197-33-1-75.
   Google Scholar
• De La Torre, M. 2013. Buried voices: Mexican migrants’ views on the question of illegality. Contemporary Justice Review 16, no. 2: 264–279. doi:10.1080/10282580.2013.798511.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, A. 2006. Street-level democracy: How immigration bureaucrats manage public opposition. West European Politics 29, no. 2: 293–309. doi:10.1080/01402380500512627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, S., and W. Walters. 2021. No place like home? The international organization for migration and the new political imaginary of deportation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48, no. 13: 3060–3077. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1984218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, A.K. 2022. Laughable borders: Making the case for the humorous in migration studies. Migration Politics 1: 004.
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2017. Refugee policy as “negative nation branding”: The case of Denmark and the Nordics. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2017: 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud, eds. 2013. Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 2016. Enfranchising all subjected, worldwide. International Theory 8, no. 3: 365–389. doi:10.1017/S1752971916000105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. The public sphere. In Rethinking Popular Culture. Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies, eds. C. Mukerji and M. Schudson, 398–404. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C. 2014. Perception management – Deterring potential migrants through information campaigns. Global Media and Communication 10, no. 3: 303–318. doi:10.1177/1742766514552355.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez Carretero, M., and J. Carling. 2012. Beyond “kamikaze migrants”: Risk taking in West African boat migration to Europe. Human Organization 71, no. 4: 407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. 2019. Glossary on Migration. Geneva: IOM.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2016. Violent Borders. Refugees and the Right to Move. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kalicki, K. 2020. Trading liberty: Assisted repatriation in liberal democracies. Government & Opposition 55, no. 4: 711–731. doi:10.1017/gov.2020.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalir, B. 2017. Between ‘voluntary’ return programs and soft deportation. In Return Migration and Psychosocial Wellbeing, eds. Zana Vathi, and Russell King, 56–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koser, K., and K. Kuschminder. 2015. Comparative Research on the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration of Migrants. Geneva: IOM.
   Google Scholar
• Kuschminder, K. 2017. Taking Stock of Assisted Voluntary Return from Europe: Decision Making, Reintegration and Sustainable Return – Time for a Paradigm shift. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2017/31.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, D., and C.A. Siracusa. 2005. Seeing the state like a migrant. Why so many non-criminals break immigration laws. In Illicit Flows and Criminal Things. States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalisation, eds. W. van Schendel, and I. Abraham, 153–176. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., R. van Os, and E. Boersema. 2017. What drives “soft deportation”? Understanding the rise in Assisted Voluntary Return among rejected asylum seekers in the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place 23, no. 8. doi:10.1002/psp.2059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenard, P.T. 2015. The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states. European Journal of Political Theory 14, no. 4: 464–480. doi:10.1177/1474885115584834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietaert, I. 2019. The usefulness of reintegration support: The dual perspectives of returnees and caseworkers. The British Journal of Social Work 49, no. 5: 1216–1233. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietaert, I., I. Derluyn, and E. Broekaert. 2013. Returnees’ perspectives on their re-migration processes. International Migration 52, no. 5: 144–158. doi:10.1111/imig.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maâ, A. 2019. Signer la déportation. Agencéité migrante et retours volontaires depuis le Maroc. Terrain. doi:10.4000/terrain.18653.
   Google Scholar
• Maâ, A. 2020. ‘Le retour incertain d’Aya et de Prince’. Penser l’incertitude et l’intermédiation des retours volontaires à partir d’une trajectoire féminine en instance de départ depuis le Maroc. Émulations 34. doi:10.14428/emulations.034.03.
   Google Scholar
• Maâ, A. 2021. Manufacturing collaboration in the deportation field: intermediation and the institutionalisation of the International Organisation for Migration’s “voluntary return” programmes in Morocco. The Journal of North African Studies 26, no. 5: 932–953. doi:10.1080/13629387.2020.1800210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maâ, A., J. Van Dessel, and I.M.S. Vammen. 2022. Can migrants do the (border)work? Conflicting dynamics and effects of “peer-to-peer” intermediation in North and West Africa. Journal of Borderlands Studies. doi:10.1080/08865655.2022.2108111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. 1995. Refugees and exile: From “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology 495–523. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menjivar, C., M. Ruiz, and I. Ness, eds. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, J., M. Alio, and R. Gardi. 2022. Meaningful refugee participation: An emerging norm in the global refugee regime. Refugee Survey Quarterly. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdac007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, J., and A. Klassen. 2021. Civil Society and the Politics of the Global Refugee Regime. Carleton, Local Engagement Refugee Research Network Paper no. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, F., and J. Jucker. 2021. ‘Mali is my Eldorado’ The Effectiveness of EU-Funded Information Campaigns on Migration. ADMIGOV Paper related to Deliverable 6.4. The Hague: Clingendael Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuys, C., and A. Pécoud. 2007. Human trafficking, information campaigns and strategies of migration control. American Behavioral Scientist 50, no. 12: 1674–1695. doi:10.1177/0002764207302474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeppen, C. 2016. ‘Leaving Afghanistan! Are you sure?’ European efforts to deter potential migrants through information campaigns. Human Geography 9, no. 2: 57–68. doi:10.1177/194277861600900206.
   Google Scholar
• Pagogna, R., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2021. Disciplining migration aspirations through migration-information campaigns: A systematic review of the literature. Geography Compass 15, no. 7. doi:10.1111/gec3.12585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2017. “Humanitarian borderwork”. In Border Politics, eds. C. Günay and N. Witjes, 85–103. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2010. Informing migrants to manage migration. An analysis of IOM’s information campaigns. In The Politics of International Migration Management, eds. M. Geiger, and A. Pécoud, 184–201. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2021. Narrating an ideal migration world? An analysis of the global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration. Third World Quarterly 42, no. 1: 16–33. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1768065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A.-L. 2019. European attempts to govern African youths by raising awareness of the risks of migration: Ethnography of an encounter. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45, no. 5: 735–751. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1415136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryo, E. 2013. Deciding to cross: Norms and economics of unauthorized migration. American Sociological Review 78, no. 4: 574–603. doi:10.1177/0003122413487904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchetti, S. 2016. Assisted “voluntary” return of women to Kosovo: Rhetoric and reality within the framework of development. Regions and Cohesion 6, no. 2: 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnige, M., M. van Houte, and A. Leerkes. 2022. Talking about return governmental caseworkers’ regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive strategies during “return conversations” with irregularised migrants. International Migration. doi:10.1111/imig.13051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. 2021. International Organization a Technocratic Utopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden, J., S. Morgenstern, and F. Laczko. 2018. Evaluating the Impact of Information Campaigns in the Field of Migration: A Systematic Review of the Evidence and Practical Guidance. Geneva: IOM.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F., O.N. Cham, and R. Caleprico. 2022. EU-Funded Information Campaigns Targeting Potential Migrants: State of the Art. BRIDGES Working Papers 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ugelvik, T. 2016. Techniques of legitimation: The narrative construction of legitimacy among immigration detention officers. Crime, Media, Culture 12, no. 2: 215–232. doi:10.1177/1741659016648180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vammen, I.M.S. 2021. ‘When migrants become messengers’: Affective borderwork and aspiration management in Senegal. Geopolitics 27, no. 5: 1410–1429. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1913408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dessel, J. 2021. Externalization through “awareness-raising”: The border spectacle of EU migration information campaigns in Niger. Territory, Politics, Governance. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1974535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2017. Between humanitarian assistance and migration management: On civil actors’ role in voluntary return from Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43, no. 11: 1907–1922. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1245609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houte, M., A. Leerkes, A. Slipper, and L. Breuls. 2021. Globalised citizenship and the perceived legitimacy of immigration control: narratives and acts of resistance in immigration detention. Migration Studies 9, no. 3: 1269–1291. doi:10.1093/migration/mnaa034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. 2020. Irregular migration, borders, and the moral geographies of migration management. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38, no. 6: 1108–1127. doi:10.1177/2399654420915607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, F. 2011. How voluntary are voluntary returns? Race & Class 52, no. 4: 98–107. doi:10.1177/0306396810396606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar