Who Wants to Participate in Routine Outcome Monitoring? Differences between Youth in Secured Residential Care Who Consent or Refuse the Use of Their Clinical Data for Research and Policy Making

References

• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, G., Veerman, J. W., Damen, H., & Kroes, G. (2001). The Child Behavior Checklist for group care workers: A study regarding the factor structure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 83–89. doi:10.1023/A:1005255614039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory - revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• BeLue, R., Taylor-Richardson, K. D., Lin, J., Rivera, A. T., & Grandison, D. (2006). African Americans and participation in clinical trials: Differences in beliefs and attitudes by gender. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 27, 498–505. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 6–19. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi experimental designs. Chicago, Ill: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• De Los Reyes, A., Thomas, S. A., Goodman, K. L., & Kundey, S. M. (2013). Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 123. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deighton, J., Croudace, T., Fonagy, P., Brown, J., Patalay, P., & Wolpert, M. (2014). Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: A review of child self-report measures. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 8, 14. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-8-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distelbrink, M., Pels, T., Tan, S., & Aarts, W. (2013). Coach je kind: Theoretische onderbouwing [Coach your kid: Theoretical framework]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52–64. Retrieved from http://sci2s.ugr.es/keel/pdf/algorithm/articulo/1961-Bonferroni_Dunn-JASA.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam, K., Van Yperen, T., Van Der Pijll, M., Lekkerkerker, L., Post, F., & De Graaf, M. (2008). Interbeoordelaarsbetrouwbaarheid Standaard Taxatie Ernst Problematiek (STEP) [Interrater reliablity STEP]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Jeugdinstituut.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. H. (1974). Weighting to adjust for survey nonresponse. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 239–246. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2748050?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geluk, C. A., Van Domburgh, L., Nauta, L., Bouwmeester, S., Vermeiren, R., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2014). Identifying children at risk of problematic development: Latent clusters among childhood arrestees. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 669–680. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9811-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. L., Moldavsky, M., Taylor, J., Sayal, K., Marriott, M., Batty, M. J., … Hollis, C. (2014). Implementation of routine outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom: A critical perspective. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23, 239–242. doi:10.1007/s00787-013-0454-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. M., Edlund, M. J., & Larson, S. (2005). Racial and ethnic differences in the mental health problems and use of mental health care. Medical Care, 43, 775–784. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16034291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Buedo, M., & Miller, L. M. (2009). Experiments in the social sciences: The relationship between external and internal validity. Theoria. 25, 301–321. Retrieved from http://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/779/700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakeman, R. (2004). Standardized routine outcome measurement: Pot holes in the road to recovery. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13, 210–215. doi:10.1111/j.1445-8330.2004.00336.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larzelere, R. E., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Single-sample tests for many correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 557–569. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.3.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, W. W., Law, R. W., Alvidrez, J., & Pérez-Stable, E. J. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity in NIMH-funded clinical trials: Review of a decade of published research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34, 497–503. doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0133-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, R., Coombs, T., & Duerden, D. (2014). The art and science of using routine outcome measurement in mental health benchmarking. Australasian Psychiatry, 22, 13–18. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, C., Lee, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2008). Outcomes for youth residential treatment programs using administrative data from the child welfare system: A risk-adjustment application. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 189–197. doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0155-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P., Kelesidi, K., Guglani, S., Davidson, S., & Ford, T. (2011). What do parents and carers think about routine outcome measures and their use? A focus group study of CAMHS attenders. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 65–79. doi:10.1177/1359104510391859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, E. A., Brand, E. F. J. M., Bullens, R. A. R., & Van Marle, H. J. C. (2010). Towards an optimal classification of juvenile offenders: Subgroups of serious juvenile offenders and severity of recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nijhof, K. S. (2011). Crossing barriers: Evaluation of a new secure residential treatment program for youth ( Doctoral dissertation). Enschede, The Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkers.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudejans, S. C., Schippers, G. M., Merkx, M. J., Schramade, M. H., Koeter, M. W., & Van Den Brink, W. (2009). Feasibility and validity of low‐budget telephonic follow‐up interviews in routine outcome monitoring of substance abuse treatment. Addiction, 104, 1138–1146. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02593.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. D., Kramer, T. L., Compton, S. N., Burns, B. J., & Robbins, J. M. (2003). Case mix adjustment of adolescent mental health treatment outcomes. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 30, 125–136. doi:10.1007/BF02287818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarti, A., Stams, G., & Jurrius, K. (2012). Trajecttevredenheid Jeugdzorg^plus: Ontwikkeling van een cliënttevredenheidsinstrument voor jongeren Jeugdzorg^plus [Client satisfaction secure residential care: Development of a measurement for youth in secure residential care]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Stichting Alexander.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeets, H., Reep, C., & Snijkers, G. (2003). Afbakenen van moeilijk waarneembare bevolkingsgroepen [Defining complex visible populations]. Bevolkingstrends, 51, 62–68.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved from http://impact.cgiar.org/pdf/147.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siebum, W., Pijl, Y. J., & De Wolf, S. (2015). Routine outcome monitoring and process quality in mental health care: A descriptive study in daily practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21, 620–625. doi:10.1111/jep.12352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The importance of external validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 9–10. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, V. E., Mauch, M. Y., Steger, K., Janas, S. F., & Craven, D. E. (1997). Race, gender, drug use, and participation in AIDS clinical trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 150–157. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.012003150.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Binsbergen, M. H. (2003). Motivatie voor behandeling; Ontwikkeling van behandelmotivatie in een justitiële inrichting [Motivation for treatment: Development of treatment motivation in judicial institutions] ( Doctoral dissertation). Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Garant Uitgevers N.V.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, A., Kleijnen, E., & Keuzenkamp, S. (2010). Naar Hollands gebruik? Verschillen in gebruik van hulp bij opvoeding, onderwijs en gezondheid tussen autochtonen en migranten [Dutch tradition? Differences in the use of support in parenting, education and health between native people and migrants]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M., Volker, D., & De Heer, E. (2010). Routine outcome monitoring: Ontwikkelingen in de GGZ [Routine Outcome Monitoring: Developments in mental health]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Trimbos Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Helm, G. H. P., Wissink, I. B., De Jongh, T., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2012). Measuring treatment motivation in secure juvenile facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 996–1008. doi:10.1177/0306624X12443798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Yperen, T., Eijgenraam, K., Van Den Berg, G., De Graaf, M., & Chênevert, C. (2010). STEP: Handleiding 2010 [STEP: User guide 2010]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Jeugdinstituut.
   Google Scholar
• Van Yperen, T. A., Van Den Berg, G., & Eijgenraam, K. (2002). Project ‘Registratie ernst van de problematiek’. Eerste deelrapport: Begrippen, doelen en instrumenten [Project registration seriousness of problem behavior. First report: Definitions, targets and measurements]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: NIZW Jeugd.
   Google Scholar
• Van Yperen, T. A., Van Den Berg, G., & Eijgenraam, K. (2003). Standaard Taxatie Ernst Problematiek (STEP). Handleiding en Formulieren [STEP: User guide and forms]. Utrecht, The Netherlands : NIZW Jeugd.
   Google Scholar
• Veerman, J. W. (2007). Een zorgevaluatiemodel als kader voor onderzoek in de praktijk van de jeugdzorg [Care evaluation model for practical research in youth care]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Praktikon.
   Google Scholar
• Verhulst, F. C., Van Der Ende, J., & Koot, H. M. (1996). Handleiding voor de CBCL/4-18 [Manual for the CBCL/4-18]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit/Afdeling Kinder- en jeugdpsychiatrie, Sophia Kinderziekenhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Vermaes, I. P. R., Konijn, C., Nijhof, K. S., Strijbosch, E., & Van Domburgh, L. (2012). Monitor Jeugdzorg^plus: Analyse van de wetenschappelijke onderbouwing en benuttingsmogelijkheden. [Longitudinal monitor for secure youth care: Analysis of the scientific framework and utility possibilities]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: ZonMw.
   Google Scholar
• Vermulst, A., Kroes, G., De Meyer, R., Nuygen, L., & Veerman, J. W. (2015). Handleiding OBVL [User guide OBVL]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Praktikon.
   Google Scholar
• Zoon, M. (2012). Kenmerken en risicofactoren van multiprobleemgezinnen [Characteristics and risk factors of multiproblem families]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Jeugd Instituut.
   Google Scholar