A Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS): Perspectives on the Present State of the Literature and Future Directions

References

• Accomazzo, S., Israel, N., & Romney, S. (2015). Resources, exposure to trauma, and the behavioral health of youth receiving public system services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3180–3191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0121-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth & Families.
   Google Scholar
• Alamdari, G., & Spanovic Kelber, M. (2016). The Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths as an outcome measure in community mental health: Factor analysis and validation of the short form. Community Mental Health Journal, 52(8), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-9996-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Amrit, C., Paauw, T., Aly, R., & Lavric, M. (2017). Identifying child abuse through text mining and machine learning. Expert Systems With Applications, 88, 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. L., Lyons, J. S., Giles, D. M., Price, J. A., & Estle, G. (2003). Reliability of the child and adolescent needs and strengths-mental health (CANS-MH) scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023935726541
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, D. J., Grigsby, C., Sheets, J., Reid, G., Graham, J. C., Robinson, D., and Wang, E. (2011). Concept guided risk assessment: Promoting prediction and understanding. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1648–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, G. L., Leon, S. C., Fuller, A. K., & Bai, G. J. (2017). Foster care children’s kinship involvement and behavioral risks: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(9), 2450–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0746-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briere, J. (1996). Trauma symptom checklist for children (TSCC) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children’s Bureau of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Trends in foster care adoption. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/trends-in-foster-care-and-adoption
   Google Scholar
• Chor, K. H. B., McClelland, G. M., Weiner, D. A., Jordan, N., & Lyons, J. S. (2012). Predicting outcomes of children in residential treatment: A comparison of a decision support algorithm and a multidisciplinary team decision model. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2345–2352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chor, B. K. H., McClelland, G. M., Weiner, D. A., Jordan, N., & Lyons, J. S. (2015). Out of home placement decision making and outcomes in child welfare: A longitudinal study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0545-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Cordell, K. D., Snowden, L. R., & Hosier, L. (2016). Patterns and priorities of service need identified through the child and adolescent needs and strengths (CANS) assessment. Children and Youth Services Review, 60, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Foust, R., Vaithianathan, R., & Putnam-Hornstein, E. (2017). Risk assessment and decision making in child protective services: Predictive risk modeling in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dilley, J. B., Weiner, D. A., Lyons, J. S., & Martinovich, Z. (2007). The validity of the child and adolescent needs and strengths assessment. (ED495282). Retrieved June 2, 2019. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED495282
   Google Scholar
• Dima, A. L. (2018). Scale validation in applied health research: Tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 136–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimmick, J., Correa, Y., Liazis, A., & McMichael, H. (2011). “Playing hooky”: Examining factors that contribute to adolescent truancy. Sociological Viewpoints, 27(1), 15–23. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/playing-hookyexamining-factors-that-contribute/docview/1009906579/se-2?accountid=7098.
   Google Scholar
• Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–124. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/validityreliability-social-science-research/docview/1020696142/se-2?accountid=7098.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. A., Schlueter, D., Gracey, K., Chandrasekhar, R., & Cull, M. J. (2015). Examining placement disruption in child welfare. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 32(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2015.1102484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 443–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, M., Chu, C. M., Barlas, J., & Chng, G. S. (2017). The role of strengths in anger and conduct problems in maltreated adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2016). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, & a survival guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kisiel, C., Patterson, N., Torgersen, E., den Dunnen, W., Villa, C., & Fehrenbach, T. (2018). Assessment of the complex effects of trauma across child serving settings: Measurement properties of the CANS-Trauma Comprehensive. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. C., Johnson, L. E., & Wang, E. W. (2017). The impact of family group decision-making on preventing removals. Children and Youth Services Review, 78(C), 89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Lardner, M. D. (2015). Are restrictiveness of care decisions based on youth level of need? A multilevel model analysis of placement levels using the child and adolescent needs and strengths assessment. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 32(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2015.1080993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K., & James, L. R. (2003). The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, 6(1), 80–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102239427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., O’Sullivan, P., & Winston, W. (2016). Effect size – Large, medium, and small. Perspectives on Medical Education, 5(6), 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0308-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Tan, M. Y., Lim, A. Y., Chu, C. M., Tan, L. J., & Quah, S. H. (2014). Profiles of needs of children in out-of-home care in Singapore: School performance, behavioral and emotional needs as well as risk behaviors. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. S. (2009). Communimetrics: A communication theory of measurement in human service settings. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. S., & Fernando. (2017). Texas CANS Manual. The Praed Foundation. https://praedfoundation.org/tools/the-child-and-adolescent-needs-and-strengths-cans/texas/
   Google Scholar
• Mark Ware Consulting (2016). Publishing research consortium: Peer review survey 2015. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/655756/PRC-peer-review-survey-report-Final-2016-05-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2000). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person’s responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Praed Foundation (2019). The John Praed Foundation: A non profit organization. https://praedfoundation.org/
   Google Scholar
• Praed Foundation (2021). Child and adolescent needs and strengths [standard CANS comprehensive 3.0]: 2021 reference guide. https://praedfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2021.01.13_REFERENCE-GUIDE_Standard-Comprehensive-CANS-3.0_CWBH_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, I. M., York, P., Nowakowski-Sims, E., & Ramos-Hernandez, A. (2017). Predictive and prescriptive analytics, machine learning and child welfare risk assessment: The Broward County experience. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol, R. L., Li, J., Victor, B. G., Miller, A. L., Ryan, J. P., & Perron, B. E. (2020). Changes in child and adolescent needs and strengths (CANS) scores over time: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 112, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, A. M., Leon, S. C., & Fuller, A. K. (2013). Predictors of reduction in symptoms of depression for children and adolescents in foster care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(3), 784–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9889-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality and Quantity, 52(1), 313–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. (2021). Child adolescent needs and strengths (CANS) assessment: A guide to medical services at CPS. https://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Child_Protection/Medical_Services/CANS_Assessment.asp
   Google Scholar
• Troy, J. D., Torrie, R. M., & Warner, D. N. (2021). A machine learning approach for identifying predictors of success in a medicaid-funded, community-based behavioral health program using the child and adolescent needs and strengths (CANS). Children and Youth Services Review, 126, 106010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E. W., Lambert, M. C., Johnson, L. E., Boudreau, B., Breidenbach, R., & Baumann, D. (2012). Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 845-850.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, D. A., Leon, S. C., & Stiehl, M. J. (2011). Demographic, clinical, and geographic predictors of placement disruption among foster care youth receiving wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9469-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Butler, A. (2018). Reducing delinquency among African American youth in foster care: Does gender make a difference in crossover prevention? Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar