Arthrocentesis with different irrigation volumes in patients with disc displacement without reduction: One-year follow-up

References

• Dworkin SF, Leresche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6(4):301–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Hassel A. The prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in very old subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarin RD, Previdelli IT, Silva RD, et al. Correlation of gender and age with magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with arthrogenic temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(10):1222–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, et al. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(6):844–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatli U, Benlidayi ME, Ekren O, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(5):603–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan DW. Arthrocentesis-incentives for using this minimally invasive approach for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2006;18(3):311–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49(11):1163–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Rana AS, Jain G, et al. Evaluation of efficacy of arthrocentesis (with normal saline) with or without sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangement of TMJ - A prospective randomized study in 20 patients. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3(3):112–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goudot P, Jaquinet AR, Hugonnet S, et al. Improvement of pain and function after arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a comparative study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000;28(1):39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneyama K, Segami N, Nishimura M, et al. The ideal lavage volume for removing bradykinin, interleukin-6, and protein from the temporomandibular joint by arthrocentesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(6):657–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu P, Lin H, Zhou Q, et al. Dynamic evaluation of lavage efficacy in upper compartment of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(2):276–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Barros Melo MN. Dos Santos Melo JN, Sarmento VA, et al. Influence of arthrocentesis irrigation volume at temporomandibular disorder treatment. Indian J Dent Res. 2017;28:655–660.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund A, Hellsing G. Arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint: an autopsy study. Int J Oral Surg. 1985;14(2):169–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neeli AS, Umarani M, Kotrashetti SM, et al. Arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010;9(4):350–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Riu G, Stimolo M, Meloni SM, et al. Arthrocentesis and temporomandibular joint disorders: clinical and radiological results of a prospective study. Int J Den. 2013;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrashekhar VK, Kenchappa U, Chinnannavar SN, et al. Arthrocentesis a minimally invasive method for TMJ disc disorders - A prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann E, Poluha RL, Iwaki LCV, et al. Predictors of arthrocentesis outcome on joint effusion in patients with disk displacement without reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2018;S2212-4403(18):30016.
   Google Scholar
• Yura S, Totsuka Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Can arthrocentesis release intracapsular adhesions? Arthroscopic findings before and after irrigation under sufficient hydraulic pressure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(11):1253–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yura S, Totsuka Y. Relationship between effectiveness of arthrocentesis under sufficient pressure and conditions of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(2):225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnuki T, Fukuda M, Nakata A, et al. Evaluation of the position, mobility, and morphology of the disc by MRI before and after four different treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(2):103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sembronio S, Albiero AM, Toro C, et al. Is there a role for arthrocentesis in recapturing the displaced disc in patients with closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(3):274–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alpaslan GH, Alpaslan C. Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:613–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorrela H, Prameela J, Srinivas G, et al. Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with sodium hyaluronate in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective randomized control trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(4):479–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi Z, Guo C, Awad M. Hyaluronate for temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD002970.
   Google Scholar
• Sato S, Takahashi K, Kawamura H, et al. The natural course of nonreducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint: changes in condylar mobility and radiographic alterations at one-year follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;27(3):173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şentürk MF, Yazıcı T, Gülşen U. Techniques and modifications for TMJ arthrocentesis: A literature review. CRANIO®. 2017;15:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Guarda-Nardini L, Ferronato G, Manfredini D. Two-needle vs. single-needle technique for TMJ arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid injections: a comparative trial over a six-month follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(4):506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann E, Guilherme Vargas Pasqual P, Poluha RL, et al. Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis: randomized clinical trial. Pain Res Manag. 2017;1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindel A, Uzuner F, Sindel M, et al. Comparison of the efficiency of irrigation of single and double-needle techniques of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: A cadaver study. CRANIO®. 2017;35(6):405–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar