Are occlusal contact area asymmetry and masticatory muscle activity asymmetry related in adults with normal dentition?

References

• Zaidi Z. Body asymmetries: incidence, etiology and clinical implications. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5:2157–2191.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valen L. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution. 1962;16(2):125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Luraghi FE, et al. The use of surface electromyography as a tool in differentiating temporomandibular disorders from neck disorders. Man Ther. 2007;12(4):372–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Galletta A, et al. The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: a surface EMG study in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(5):341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr., et al. Electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles in normal young people. Statistical evaluation of reference values for clinical applications. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20(3):271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapelli A, Zanandrea Machado BC, Giglio LD, et al. Reorganization of muscle activity in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;72:164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeije M, McCarroll RS, Weijs WA. Electromyographic activity of the human masticatory muscles during submaximal clenching in the inter-cuspal position. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16(1):63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguchi T, Garetto LP, Sato Y, et al. Statistical analysis of differential lissajous EMG from normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(2):151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno I, Sanchez T, Ardizone I, et al. Electromyographic comparisons between clenching, swallowing and chewing in jaw muscles with varying occlusal parameters. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13(3):E207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes SG, Custodio W, Faot F, et al. Chewing side, bite force symmetry, and occlusal contact area of subjects with different facial vertical patterns. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(5):446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek A, Loster J, Loster BW, et al. Correlation between activity and asymmetry indices and skeletal classes in symptomatic-free young adults. J Stoma. 2013;66(6):750–760.
   Google Scholar
• Yamasaki Y, Kuwatsuru R, Tsukiyama Y, et al. Objective assessment of actual chewing side by measurement of bilateral masseter muscle electromyography. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(12):1756–1762. DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woźniak K, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Lichota D. The electrical activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in patients with TMD and unilateral posterior crossbite. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:259372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek A, Loster J, Loster BW. Relationship between occlusal force distribution and the activity of masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in asymptomatic young adults. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felicio CM, Ferreira CL, Medeiros AP, et al. Electromyographic indices, orofacial myofunctional status and temporomandibular disorders severity: A correlation study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(2):266–272. DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotta GH, Oliveira A, Oliveira A, et al. Electromyography and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in undergraduate students with temporomandibular disorders. Braz J Oral Sci. 2015;14(2):176–181. DOI:10.1590/1677-3225v14n2a15.
   Google Scholar
• Boero RP. The physiology of splint therapy: a literature review. Angle Orthod. 1989;59(3):165–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawazoe Y, Kotani H, Hamada T, et al. Effect of occlusal splints on the electromyographic activities of masseter muscles during maximum clenching in patients with myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43(5):578–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humsi AN, Naeije M, Hippe JA, et al. The immediate effects of a stabilization splint on the muscular symmetry in the masseter and anterior temporal muscles of patients with a craniomandibular disorder. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(3):339–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Tartaglia GM, et al. Immediate effect of a stabilization splint on masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(9):810–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcon JA, Martin C, Palma JC, et al. Activity of jaw muscles in unilateral cross-bite without mandibular shift. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54(2):108–814. DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G. The influence of crossbite on the coordinated electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles during mastication. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(7):575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliaridis S, Mahboubi PH, Raadsheer MC, et al. Ultrasonographic thickness of the masseter muscle in growing individuals with unilateral crossbite. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(4):607–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Serrao G, Dellavia C, et al. Relationship between the number of occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity in healthy young adults. CRANIO®. 2002;20(2):91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikholeslam A, Riise C. Influence of experimental interfering occlusal contacts on the activity of the anterior temporal and masseter muscles during submaximal and maximal bite in the intercuspal position. J Oral Rehabil. 1983;10(3):207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralur SB, Majeed MI, Chaturvedi S, et al. Association between preferred chewing side and dynamic occlusal parameters. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(5):1908–1915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B-Y, Zhou L-J, Guo S-X, et al. An investigation on the simultaneously recorded occlusion contact and surface electromyographic activity for patients with unilateral temporomandibular disorders pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016;28:199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyakurel U, Long H, Jian F, et al. Mechanism, accuracy and application of T-scan system in dentistry-A review. J of Nep Dent Assoc. 2013;3:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H, et al. Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1987;45(2):101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, et al. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121(6):602–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumonsiri P, Thongudomporn U, Paphangkorakit J, et al. Assessment of the relationship between masticatory performance, occlusal contact area, chewing time and cycles, and gastric emptying scintigraphy in dentate subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(9):787–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horie T, Kanazawa M, Komagamine Y, et al. Association between near occlusal contact areas and mixing ability. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(11):829–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujan-Climent M, Martinez-Gomis J, Palau S, et al. Influence of static and dynamic occlusal characteristics and muscle force on masticatory performance in dentate adults. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116(3):229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepley CR, Throckmorton GS, Ceen RF, et al. Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens JP, Priebe JW. Occlusal stability. Dent Clin N Am. 2014;58(1):19–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Zietek M, et al. Evaluation of the elastic properties of thirteen silicone interocclusal recording materials. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramoff M, Magalhães P, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 2003;11:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Anderson GC, DeLong R. Digital imaging of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position. J Prosthodont. 1994;3(4):193–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merletti R, Di Torino P. Standards for reporting EMG data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(1):3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C. Coordinated electromyographic activity of the human masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during mastication. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104(5–6):511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão M, Sato JR, Coelho EC. Dahlberg formula: a novel approach for its evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(1):115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke M, Michler L, Moller E. Occlusal control of mandibular elevator muscles. Scand J Dent Res. 1992;100(5):284–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald JW, Hannam AG. Relationship between occlusal contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: part I. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(5):718–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek A, Loster JE. Activity of the masticatory muscles and occlusal contacts in young adults with and without orthodontic treatment. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farella M, Palumbo A, Milani S, et al. Synergist coactivation and substitution pattern of the human masseter and temporalis muscles during sustained static contractions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(1):190–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im YG, Han SH, Park JI, et al. Repeatability of measurements of surface electromyographic variables during maximum voluntary contraction of temporalis and masseter muscles in normal adults. J Oral Sci. 2017;59(2):233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castroflorio T, Falla D, Wang K, et al. Effect of experimental jaw-muscle pain on the spatial distribution of surface EMG activity of the human masseter muscle during tooth clenching. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(2):81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shekhlee A, Shapiro BE, Preston DC. Iatrogenic complications and risks of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27(5):517–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DI. Technical issues and potential complications of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography. Neurol Clin. 2012;30(2):685–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, et al. An electromyographic investigation of masticatory muscles symmetry in normo-occlusion subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sforza C, Peretta R, Grandi G, et al. Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(4):691–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Palma E, Gasparini G, Pelo S, et al. Activities of masticatory muscles in patients after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(7):417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar