The oronasopharyngeal space and renewed formalization of the functional matrix hypothesis

References

• Moss-Salentijn L, Melvin L. Moss and the functional matrix. J Dent Res. 1997;76(12):1814–1817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss ML, Salentijn L. The capsular matrix. Am J Orthod. 1969 Nov 56;56(5):474–490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):566–577.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moss ML. Experimental alteration of basi-synchondrosal cartilage growth in rat and mouse. In: Bosma JF, editor. Development of the Basicranium. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976. p. 541–575.
   Google Scholar
• Moss ML, Rankow RM. The role of the functional matrix in mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 1968;38(2):95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benazzi S, Kullmer O, Grosse IR, et al. Using occlusal wear information and finite element analysis to investigate stress distributions in human molars. J Anat. 2011;219(3):259–272. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01396.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono RT, Suwa G, Tanijiri T. A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47(12):867–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel ER, Van Woerden JT, Lucas PW, et al. Functional ecology and evolution of hominoid molar enamel thickness- Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii and Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii. J Hum Evol. 2008;55(1):60–74. DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaizumi Y, Maeda T, Takano T. Three-dimensional arrangement of enamel prisms and their relationship to the formation of Hunter-Schreger bands in dog tooth. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;286(1):103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai H, Lee JJ-W, Constantino PJ, et al. Remarkable resilience of teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(18):7289–7293. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0902466106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, et al. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47(4):281–291. DOI:10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00006-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall GWJ, Balooch M, Gallagher RR, et al. Mechanical properties of the dentinoenamel junction: AFM studies of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and fracture. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54(1):87–95. DOI:10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<87::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde A. Microstructure of enamel. In: Chadwick DJ, Cardew G, editors. Dental enamel. CIBA Foundation Symposium 205. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1997. p. 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominy NJ, Vogel ER, Yeakel JD, et al. Mechanical properties of plant underground storage organs and implications for dietary models of early hominids. Evol Biol. 2008;35:159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal KR, Lucas PW, Prinz JF, et al. Mechanical properties of foods responsible for resisting food breakdown in the human mouth. Arch Oral Biol. 1997;42(1):1–9. DOI:10.1016/S0003-9969(96)00102-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LJ, Gaviao MBD, Bilt AVD. Influence of oral characteristics and food products on masticatory function. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64(4):193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DC, Grote MN, Weaver TD. Changes in human skull morphology across the agricultural transition are consistent with softer diets in preindustrial farming groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(34):9050–9055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro-Ibacache V, Ugarte F, Morales C, et al. Dental malocclusions are not just about small and weak bones: assessing the morphology of the mandible with cross-section analysis and geometric morphometrics. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(9):3479–3490. DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2766-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elad D, Liebenthal R, Wenig BL, et al. Analysis of air flow patterns in the human nose. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1993;31(6):585–592. DOI:10.1007/BF02441806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallam GM, McClaran SR, Cox DG, et al. Effect of nasal versus oral breathing on vo2max and physiological economy in recreational runners following an extended period spent using nasally restricted breathing. Int J Kinesiol Sports Sci. 2018;6(2):22–29. DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.2p.22
   Google Scholar
• Svensson S, Olin AC, Hellgren J. Increased net water loss by oral compared to nasal expiration in healthy subjects. Rhinology. 2006;44(1):74–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SJ. Nasal aerodynamics. Medscape 2019. 2019 4 Nov [cited 2020 Dec 28]; Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/874822-print
   Google Scholar
• Aoun L, Larnier S, Weiss P, et al. Measure and characterization of the forces exerted by growing multicellular spheroids using microdevice arrays. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217227. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0217227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo B. Distribution of stress and strain produced in the human facial skeleton by the masticatory force. Zinrugaku Zassi. 1965;73:9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu H-Y, Yamaguchi K. Decreased chewing activity during mouth breathing. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(8):559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz RA. Changes in nasal airflow incident to rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthodontist. 1968;38(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Popat H, Johnson I, et al. Professional consensus on orthodontic risks: what orthodontists should tell their patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(1):41–52. DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith A. Evolution and ethics. New York (NY): G.P. Putnam’s Sons; 1947.
   Google Scholar