References
- Clough, M.P. 2006. Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science and Education 15 (5): 463–94.
- Kruse, J.W., J. Easter, H.S. Edgerly, and J. Wilcox. 2017. Myths about the nature of technology and engineering: Using philosophy of technology and engineering to expose flawed ideas about technology. The Science Teacher 84 (5): 39–43.
- Kruse, J.W., and J.L. Wilcox. 2017a. Using a water purification activity to teach philosophy and nature of technology. Technology and Engineering Teacher 76 (8): 13–19.
- Kruse, J.W., and J. Wilcox. 2017b. Building technological literacy with philosophy of technology. Science and Children 54 (7): 66–73.
- Lee, H., and H. Lee. 2015. Analysis of students’ socioscientific decision-making from the nature of technology perspectives. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35 (1): 169–77.
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (NGAC and CCSSO). 2010. Common core state standards. Washington, DC: NGAC and CCSSO.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
- Pleasants, J., and J.K. Olson. 2018. What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K–12 education. Science Education 103 (1): 145–66 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21483.