References
- Achieve, Inc. 2017. Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units. Washington, DC: Achieve.
- Edelson, D.C. 2001. Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (3): 355–385.
- Ford, M.J. 2015. Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education 99 (6): 1041–1048.
- Furtak, E.M., and W.R. Penuel. 2019. Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands-on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education 103 (1): 167–186.
- Lunetta, V.N., A. Hofstein, and M.P. Clough. 2007. Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In Handbook of research on science education, eds. S.K. Abell, and N. G. Lederman, 393–441. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Manz, E., and I.P. Renga. 2017. Understanding how teachers guide evidence construction conversations. Science Education 101 (4): 584–615.
- Miller, E., E. Manz, R. Russ, D. Stroupe, and L. Berland. 2018. Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (7): 1053–1075.
- Wilcox, J. 2011. Holding ourselves to a higher standard: Using standards-based grading in science as a means to improve teaching and learning. Iowa Science Teachers Journal (3): 4–11.