References
- Holub, J., J. Kruse, and L. Menke. 2020. Deconstructing solids: Exploring the nature of technology and engineering in second grade. Science and Children 57 (7): 28–33.
- Kruse, J., H. Edgerly, J. Easter, and J. Wilcox. 2017. Myths about the nature of technology and engineering. The Science Teacher 84 (5): 39.
- Kruse, J., I. Kent-Schneider, S. Voss, K. Zacharski, and M. Rockefeller. 2022. Investigating the effect of NOS question type on students’ NOS responses. Research in Science Education 52: 61–78.
- Kruse, J., and J. Wilcox. 2017a. Building technological literacy with philosophy and nature of technology. Science and Children 54 (7): 66–73.
- Kruse, J., and J. Wilcox. 2017b. Using a water purification activity to teach the philosophy and nature of technology. Technology and Engineering Teacher 76 (8): 13–19.
- Pleasants, J., M.P. Clough, J.K. Olson, and G. Miller. 2019. Fundamental issues regarding the nature of technology. Science and Education 28 (3): 561–597.
- Pleasants, J., and J.K. Olson. 2019. What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K-12 education. Science Education 103 (1): 145–166.
- van Lohuizen, K. 2017, November 21. Drowning in garbage. The Washington Post. Available at https://wapo.st/3ifHOnM
- Voss, S., J. Kruse, and I. Kent-Schneider. 2022. Comparing student responses to convergent, divergent, and evaluative nature of science questions. Research in Science Education 52 (4): 1277–1291.
- Wilcox, J., and M. Townsley. 2022. Debunking myths of standardsbased grading. The Science Teacher 90 (1): 28–33.