References
- Clough, M.P. 2007. What is so important about asking questions? Iowa Science Teachers Journal 34(1) 2–4.
- Guskey, T.R. 2020. Get set, go! Creating successful grading and reporting systems. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
- Isabelle, A.D. 2007. Teaching science using stories: The storyline approach. Science Scope 31(2): 16–25.
- Lappan, G., J.T. Fey, W.M. Fitzgerald, S.N. Friel, and E.D. Phillips. 2006. Connected mathematics 2. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- O’Connor, K., L.A. Jung, and D. Reeves. 2018. Gearing up for FAST grading and reporting. Phi Delta Kappan 99(8): 67–71.
- Oliveira, A.W. 2010. Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(4): 422–453.
- Penick, J.E., L.W. Crow, and R.J. Bonnstetter, 1996. Questions are the answer. The Science Teacher 63(1): 26–29.
- Townsley, M., and N.L. Wear. 2020. Making grades matter: Standards-based grading in a secondary PLC at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
- Voss, S., J. Kruse, and I. Kent-Schneider. 2022. Comparing student responses to convergent, divergent, and evaluative nature of science questions. Research in Science Education 52(4): 1277–1291.
- Wilcox, J. 2008. Eyes on your classroom: Collaborating with others to improve your practice. Iowa Science Teachers Journal 35(3): 7–11.
- Wilcox, J. 2011. Holding ourselves to a higher standard: Using standards-based grading in science as a means to improve teaching and learning. Iowa Science Teachers Journal 38(3): 4–11.
- Wilcox, J., N. Moore, S. Nolting, C. Reyna, and C. Potter, C. 2021a. Don’t force it: Using guiding questions to scaffold kindergartner’s thinking of pushes and pulls. Science and Children 59(2): 48–53.
- Wilcox, J., C. Lucht, K. Murano, E. McBroom, and J.W. Kruse. 2021b. Launching inquiry into motion: Using launch-explore-summarize to explore energy and motion. Science Scope 45(2): 40–49.
- Wilcox, J., and M. Townsley. 2022. Debunking myths of standards-based grading: Addressing the concerns and providing some strategies for implementing alternative grading practices. The Science Teacher 90(1): 29–33.