Discourse analysis and non-representational theories in heritage studies: a non-reductionist take on their compatibility

References

• Abousnnouga, Gill, and Machin, David, 2011. The changing spaces of war commemoration: a multimodal analysis of the discourses of British monuments. Social Semiotics, 21 (2), 175–196. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.548640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Jon, 2015. Understanding cultural geography. Places and traces. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Ben, 2018. Cultural geography II: The force of representations. Progress in Human Geography, 0309132518761431. doi:10.1177/0309132518761431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, Susan L. T, 2016. Acts of heritage, acts of value: memorialising at the Chattri Indian Memorial, UK. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22 (7), 554–567. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1167107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal, Mieke, 2007. Exhibition as Film. In: Sharon Macdonald, and Paul Basu, ed. Exhibition Experiments. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Chris, 2012. Cultural studies. Theory and practice (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy, 2012. From science to dmancipation. Alienation and the actuality of enlightenment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy, 2016. Enlightened Common Sense. The philosophy of critical realism. London: Bhaskar.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy, and Danermark, Berth, 2006. Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: a critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8 (4), 278–297. doi: 10.1080/15017410600914329
   Google Scholar
• Bille, Mikkel, and Simonsen, Kirsten, 2019. Atmospheric practices: on affecting and being affected. Space and Culture, 1–15. doi:10.1177/1206331218819711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondi, Liz, 2005. Making connections and thinking through emotions: between geography and psychotherapy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (4), 433–448. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00183.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Gary, and Smith, Laurajane, 2016. Keeping critical heritage studies critical: why “Post-Hmanism” and the “New Materialism” are not so critical. In: Unpublished conference paper. Given at the third Association of Critical Heriage Studies Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Fairclough, Norman, 1999. Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, Denis, and Jackson, Peter, 1987. New directions in cultural geography. Area, 19 (2), 95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, Tim, 2010. New cultural geography – an unfinished project? Cultural Geographies, 17 (2), 169–174. doi:10.1177/1474474010363845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, Tim, 2012. Nonrepresentational theory and me: notes of an interested sceptic. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30 (1), 96–105. doi:10.1068/d494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, David, 2010. The perpetual performance and emergence of heritage. In: Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Culture, heritage and representation. Perspectives on visuality and the past. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, Mads, Eisner, Rivka Syd, and Knudsen, Britta Timm, 2014. Re-enacting the past: vivifying heritage ‘again’. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20 (7-8), 681–687. doi:10.1080/13527258.2014.939426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, John David, et al., 2002. Introduction. Enacting geographies. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 33, 437–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, Jason, and Waterton, Emma, 2017. Affecting the body. Cultures of militarism at the Australian War Memorial. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Deborah P., and Jones, John Paul, 2004. Poststructuralism. In: James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard H. Schein, ed. A Companion to cultural geography. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 79–107.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, James S., and Duncan, Nancy G., 2004. Culture unbound. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36 (3), 391–403. doi:10.1068/a3654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerick, Keith, 2017. Please Mr President, we know you are busy, but can you get our bridge sorted? In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 257–275.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2006. Language and globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2009. A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In: Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, ed. Methods of critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 162–186.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2010a. Critical discourse analysis in researching language in the new capitalism: overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis. In: Norman Fairclough, ed. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman, 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2010b. A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis. In: Norman Fairclough, ed. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman, 230–254.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2013. Language awareness: Critical and non-critical approaches. In: Norman Fairclough, ed. Critical language awareness. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2016. A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In: Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, ed. Methods of critical discourse studies. London: Sage Publications, 86–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, 2018. CDA as dialectical reasoning. In: John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, ed. The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, Jessop, Bob, and Sayer, Andrew, 2010. Critical realism and semiosis. In: Norman Fairclough, ed. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman, 202–222.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent, 1991. Rationalitet og magt. Bind 1. Det konkretes videnskab. Odense: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Golańska, Dorota, 2015. Affective spaces, sensuous engagements: in quest of a synaesthetic approach to ‘dark memorials’. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21 (8), 773–790. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1020960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewcock, Duncan, 2014. Performing heritage (studies) at the Lord Mayor’s show. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20 (7-8), 760–781. doi:10.1080/13527258.2013.807434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guneriussen, Willy, 2017. Sociology and the power of (Ordinary) language. In: Peter Sohlberg, and Håkon Leiulfsrud, ed. Theory in action. theoretical constructionism. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, Michelle, 2007. Legibility and affect: Mueums as new media. In: Sharon Macdonald, and Paul Basu, ed. Exhibition experiments. Maldon, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, Bob, and Kress, Gunther, 1988. Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Högberg, Anders, 2012. The voice of the authorized heritage discourse. A critical analysis of signs at ancient monuments in Skåne, southern Sweden. Current Swedish Archaeology, 20, 131–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hølleland, Herdis, and Skrede, Joar, 2018. What’s wrong with heritage experts? An interdisciplinary discussion of experts and expertise in heritage studies AU – Hølleland, Herdis. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1–12. doi:10.1080/13527258.2018.1552613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, Karl Georg, and Næss, Petter, 2012. Introductory perspectives. In: Roy Bhaskar, Karl Georg Høyer, and Petter Næss, ed. Ecophilosophy in a world of crisis. Critical realism and the Nordic contributions. London: Routledge, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Siân, 2017. Wrestling with the social value of heritage: problems, dilemmas and opportunities. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4 (1), 21–37. doi:10.1080/20518196.2016.1193996.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, 1998. Destination culture. Tourism, museums, and heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, 2010. Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and van Leeuwen, Theo, 2006. Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S, 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed., 50th anniversary ed. ed. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal, 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, Per, and Machin, David, 2018. Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lixinski, Lucas, 2013. International cultural heritage regimes, international law, and the politics of expertise. International Journal of Cultural Property, 20 (4), 407–429. doi: 10.1017/S0940739113000210
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, Hayden, 2005. Cultural geography: the busyness of being `more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29 (1), 83–94. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph531pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, 2005. Power: a radical view. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, David, 2013. Introduction. what is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10 (4), 347–355. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, David, and Mayr, Andrea, 2012. How to do critical discourse analysis. A multimodal introduction. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, Hannah, 2010. Non-representational approaches to body-landscape relations. Geography Compass, 4 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mains, Susan P, 2017. From Menie to Montego Bay: documenting, representing and mobilising emotion in coastal heritage landscapes. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, John Rupert, 2003. Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in english. In: Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, ed. Evaluations in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–175.
   Google Scholar
• Message, Kylie, and Witcomb, Andrea, 2015. Introduction: museum theory: an expanded field. In: Andrea Witcomb, and Kylie Message, ed. The international handbooks of museum studies. Volum 1. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Bjørnar, 1997. Fra ting til tekst. Teoretiske perspektiv i arkeologisk forskning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Arthur, Scott, Mark, and Redmond, Declan, 2016a. Competing discourses of built heritage: lay values in Irish conservation planning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22 (3), 261–273. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1121404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Arthur, Scott, Mark, and Redmond, Declan, 2016b. Defining “official” built heritage discourses within the Irish planning framework: Insights from conservation planning as social practice. European Planning Studies, 24 (2), 277–296. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1077782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pile, Steve, 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savenije, Geerte M., and de Bruijn, Pieter, 2017. Historical empathy in a museum: uniting contextualisation and emotional engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1339108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, John, 2014. Heritage expertise and the everyday: citizens and authority in the twenty-first century. In: John Schofield, ed. Who needs experts? counter-mapping cultural heritage. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, John, 2015. “Thinkers and feelers”: a psychological perspective on heritage and society. In: Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 417–425.
   Google Scholar
• Schorch, Philipp, 2014. Cultural feelings and the making of meaning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20 (1), 22–35. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.709194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorch, Philipp, Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2017. Museum canopies and affective cosmopolitanism. Cultivation cross-cultural landscapes for ethnical embodied responses. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Laurajane, 2006. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Laurajane, 2017. ‘We are … we are everything’: the politics of recognition and misrecognition at immigration museums. Museum and Society, 15 (1), 69–86. doi: 10.29311/mas.v15i1.663
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Laurajane, and Campbell, Gary, 2016. The elephant in the room: heritage, affect, and emotion. In: William S. Logan, Nic Craith Máiréad, and Ullrich Kockel, ed. A companion to heritage studies. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 443–460.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg, Peter, and Leiulfsrud, Håkon, 2017. Theory and theoretical operations. In: Peter Sohlberg, and Håkon Leiulfsrud, ed. Theory in Action. theoretical Constructionism. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Somdahl-Sands, Katrinka, 2019. Book review of taking-place: non-representational theories and geography. Available from: https://radicalantipode.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/book-review_somdahl-sands-on-anderson-and-harrison.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Geoff, and Hunston, Susan, 2003. Evaluation: an introduction. In: Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, ed. Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel, 2004. Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86 (1), 57–78. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel, 2008. Non-representational theory. Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel, Harrison, Paul, and Anderson, Ben, 2010. ‘The 27th letter’: an interview with nigel thrift. In: Ben Anderson, and Paul Harrison, ed. Taking-place: non-representational theories and geography. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, Divya P, 2010. The geographies of cultural geography I: identities, bodies and race. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (3), 358–367. doi:10.1177/0309132509343378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, Divya P, 2017. Race and affect at the museum. The museum as a theatre of pain. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emption. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, Divya P., Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2017a. Preface. Heritage, affect and emotion. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, Divya P., Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2017b. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, Divya P., Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2017c. Introduction. Heritage, affect and emotion. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun A, 2018. Socio-cognitive discourse studies. In: John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, ed. The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge, 26–43.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo, 2017. Keynote – 6th New Zealand discourse conference: emotion and music – a social-semiotic approach. In: Auckland University of Technology, Available from: https://www.nzdc2017.co.nz/theo-van-leeuwen-abstract.html [Accessed 20 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, 2009. Sights of sites: picturing heritage, power and exclusion. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 4 (1), 37–56. doi:10.1080/17438730802221117.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, 2010a. Branding the past: the visual imagery of England’s heritage. In: Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Culture, heritage and representation. Perspectives on visuality and the past. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, 2010b. Politics, policy and the discourses of heritage in Britain. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, 2014. A more-than-representational understanding of heritage? The ‘past’ and the politics of affect. Geography Compass, 8 (11), 823–833. doi:10.1111/gec3.12182.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, Smith, Laurajane, and Campbell, Gary, 2006. The utility of discourse analysis to heritage studies: The Burra Charter and social inclusion. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12 (4), 339–355. doi:10.1080/13527250600727000.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2013. Framing theory: towards a critical imagination in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19 (6), 546–561. doi:10.1080/13527258.2013.779295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve, 2014. The semiotics of heritage tourism, tourism and cultural change. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Megan, 2006. Pedagogic affect/effect: embodying a desire to learn. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1 (4), 269–282. doi:10.1080/15544800701341533.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, Margaret, 2012. Affect and emotion. A new social science understanding. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Tim, 2013. Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19 (6), 532–545. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.720997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witcomb, Andrea, 2013. Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28 (3), 255–271. doi:10.1080/09647775.2013.807998.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, Andrea, and Buckley, Kristal, 2013. Engaging with the future of ‘critical heritage studies’: looking back in order to look forward. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19 (6), 562–578. doi:10.1080/13527258.2013.818570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael, 2009. Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, ed. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Yarker, Susan P, 2017. Social housing as built heritage: the presence and absence of affective heritage. In: Divya P. Tolia-Kelly, Emma Waterton, and Steve Watson, ed. Heritage, affect and emotion. Politics, practices and infrastructures. London: Routledge, 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, Sharon, 2012. The social production of urban cultural heritage: identity and ecosystem on an Amsterdam shopping street. City, Culture and Society, 3 (4), 281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2012.10.002
   Google Scholar