The area around the grave markers: contextualizing a neglected pet cemetery in northern Finland

References

• Äikäs, T., J. Ikäheimo, and R.-M. Leinonen. 2021. “How to Mound a Horse? Remembrance and Thoughts of Afterlife at Finnish Companion Animal Cemetery.” Society & Animals (Advance Article). doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10044.
   Google Scholar
• Ambros, B. 2010. “The Necrogeography of Pet Memorial Spaces: Pets as Liminal Family Members in Contemporary Japan.” Material Religion 6 (3): 304–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auster, C. J., L. J. Auster-Gussman, and E. C. Carlson. 2020. “Lancaster Pet Cemetery Memorial Plaques 1951–2018: An Analysis of Inscriptions.” Anthrozoös 33 (2): 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardina, S. 2017. “Social Functions of a Pet Graveyard: Analysis of Gravestone Records at the Metropolitan Pet Cemetery in Moscow.” Anthrozoös 30 (3): 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian, C., and C. Coutts. 2010. “Planning for the Disposal of the Dead.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes, S. 2009. “The Meaning of American Pet Cemetery Gravestones.” Ethnology 48: 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Burström, M. 2009. “Garbage or Heritage: The Existential Dimension of a Car Cemetery.” In Contemporary Archaeologies: Excavating Now, edited by C. Holtorf, and A. Piccini, 131–143. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Capels, V., and W. Senville. 2006. “Planning for Cemeteries.” Planning Commissioners Journal 64: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfen, R. 2003. “Celebrating Life after Death: The Appearance of Snapshots in Japanese Pet Gravesites.” Visual Studies 18: 144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Chung Ho, K. 2018. “Spatial Structure and Historical Change of Cemeteries in Seattle, USA.” Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 187: 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, A., and K. Harrison. 2011. “Swinging the Blue Lamp: The Forensic Archaeology of Contemporary Child and Animal Burial in the UK.” Mortality 16 (2): 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. J., and G. Bennett. 2016. “Planning, Provision and Perpetuity of Deathscapes—Past and Future Trends and the Impact for City Planners.” Land Use Policy 55: 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, K. H., H. Nordh, and M. Skaar. 2017. “Everyday Use of Urban Cemeteries: A Norwegian Case Study.” Landscape and Urban Planning 159: 76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillemin, B. 2009. “Vivre et construire la mort des animaux.” Ethnologie Française 39: 495–507.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 2019. “The Fly that Tried to Save the World: Saproxylic Geographies and Other-Than-Human Ecologies.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2): 392–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, S., and P. Salkin. 2020. “Death Need Not Part Owners and their Pets: Regulating Pet Cemeteries through Zoning Regulation.” Zoning and Planning Law Report 43 (6): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, A. 2011. Cultural Studies on Death and Dying. Oslo: Novus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, T. 2006. “Sacred Spaces, Common Places: The Cemetery in the Contemporary American City.” Geographical Review 96 (2): 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauru, K., S. Lehvävirta, K. Korpela, and D. J. Kotze. 2012. “Closure of View to the Urban Matrix has Positive Effects on Perceived Restorativeness in Urban Forests in Helsinki, Finland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 107: 361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, P. 2015. At Home and Astray: The Domestic Dog in Victorian Britain. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikäheimo, J. 2020. “The Rescue Excavation and Reburial of Late Pet Animals as Explorative Archaeological Autoethnography.” In Entangled Beliefs and Rituals: Religion in Finland and Sápmi from Stone Age to Contemporary Times, edited by T. Äikäs, and S. Lipkin, 236–252. Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland 8. Helsinki: The Archaeological Society of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Jennbert, K. 2003. “Animal Graves: Dog, Horse and Bear.” Current Swedish Archaeology 11: 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kean, H. 2013. “Human and Animal Space in Historic ‘Pet’ Cemeteries in London, New York and Paris.” In Animal Death, edited by J. Johnston, and F. Probyn-Rapsey, 21–42. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, E. 2004. “Pet Funerals and Animal Graves in Japan.” Mortality 9 (1): 42–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kniffen, F. 1967. “Necrogeography in the United States.” Geographical Review 57 (3): 426–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. Y., C. Sarkar, Z. Sun, and I. Scott. 2020. “Are Greenspace Attributes Associated with Perceived Restorativeness? A Comparative Study of Urban Cemeteries and Parks in Edinburgh, Scotland.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 53: 126720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. 2019. “Dear Departed: Writing the Lifeworlds of Place.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2): 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1979. “Age and Artifact: Dilemmas of Appreciation.” In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, edited by D. W. Meinig, 103–128. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, K. J. 2013. “Cycles, Ceremonies, and Creeping Phlox.” Journal of Leisure Research 45 (5): 624–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangum, T. 2007. “Animal Angst. Victorians Memorialize their Pets.” In Victorian Animal Dreams: Representations of Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture, edited by D. Denenholz Morse, and M. A. Danahay, 15–34. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, A. 2018. “‘That This Too, Too Solid Flesh Would Melt … ’: Necrogeography, Gravestones, Cemeteries, and Deathscapes.” Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 42 (5): 548–565.
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, W. D. 1955. “The Cemeteries of Chicago: A Phase of Land Utilization.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 45 (3): 245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregowski, M. P. 2016. “All the World and a Little Bit More. Pet Cemetery Practices and Contemporary Relations between Humans and their Companion Animals.” In Mourning Animals: Rituals and Practices Surrounding Animal Death, edited by M. de Mello, 47–54. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pregowski, M. P. 2018. “Companion Animals in Japan, Poland and the United States of America.” Analecta Nipponica: Journal of Polish Association for Japanese Studies 8: 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Puzdrakiewicz, K. 2020. “Cemeteries as (Un)wanted Heritage of Previous Communities. An Example of Changes in the Management of Cemeteries and their Social Perception in Gdańsk, Poland.” Landscape Online 86: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Quinton, J. M., and P. N. Duinker. 2019. “Beyond Burial: Researching and Managing Cemeteries as Urban Green Spaces, with Examples from Canada.” Environmental Reviews 27: 252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, J. M., P. N. Duinker, J. W. N. Steenberga, and J. D. Charles. 2020. “The Living among the Dead: Cemeteries as Urban Forests, Now and in the Future.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 48: 126564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, J. M., J. Östberg, and P. N. Duinker. 2020a. “The Importance of Multi-Scale Temporal and Spatial Management for Cemetery Trees in Malmö, Sweden.” Forests 11 (1): 78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, J. M., J. Östberg, and P. N. Duinker. 2020b. “The Influence of Cemetery Governance on Tree Management in Urban Cemeteries: A Case Study of Halifax, Canada and Malmö, Sweden.” Landscape and Urban Planning 194: 103699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, J. 2000. “Defining the Place of Burial: What Makes a Cemetery a Cemetery?” Mortality 5 (3): 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N., and D. Redmalm. 2019. “Transgressing Boundaries of Grievability: Ambiguous Emotions at Pet Cemeteries.” Emotion, Space and Society 31: 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skår, M., H. Nordh, and G. Swensen. 2018. “Green Urban Cemeteries: More than Just Parks.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 11 (3): 362–382.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelman, V., and R. Kastenbaum. 1990. “Pet Rest Memorial: Is Eternity Running Out of Time?” OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 21 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swensen, G., H. Nordh, and J. Brendalsmo. 2016. “A Green Space Between Life and Death – A Case Study of Activities in Gamlebyen Cemetery in Oslo, Norway.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 70 (1): 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., and D. F. Hochuli. 2017. “Defining Greenspace: Multiple Uses across Multiple Disciplines.” Landscape and Urban Planning 158: 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourigny, E. 2020. “Do All Dogs Go to Heaven? Tracking Human-Animal Relationships through the Archaeological Survey of Pet Cemeteries.” Antiquity 94 (378): 1614–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. 2011. “Ashes to Asses: An Archaeological Perspective on Death and Donkeys.” Journal of Material Culture 16 (3): 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodthorpe, K. 2011. “Sustaining the Contemporary Cemetery: Implementing Policy alongside Conflicting Perspectives and Purpose.” Mortality 16 (3): 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Zeigler, D. J. 2015. “Visualizing the Dead: Contemporary Cemetery Landscapes.” In The Changing World Religion Map, edited by S. Brunn, 649–667. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar