References
- Anthony, R.N. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Boston: Harvard, 1965.
- Ashton, R.H. and S.S. Kramer. “Students as Surrogates in Behavioral Accounting Research: Some Evidence,” Journal of Accounting Research, 18:1, 1980, pp. 1–15.
- Barr, S.H. and M.A. Hitt. “A Comparison of Selection Decision Models in Manager Versus Student Samples,” Personnel Psychology, 39, 1986, pp. 599–617.
- Burnett, J.J. and P.M. Dunne. “An Appraisal of the Use of Student Subjects in Marketing Research,” Journal of Business Research, 14, 1986, pp. 329–343.
- Cochran, W.G. and C.W. Cox. Experimental Designs, New York: John Wiley, 1950.
- Dobbins, G.H., I.M. Lane, and D.D. Steiner. “A Further Examination of Student Babies and Laboratory Bath Water: A Response to Slade and Gordon,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 1988, pp. 377–378.
- Dobbins, G.H., I.M. Lane, and D.D. Steiner. “A Note on the Role of Laboratory Methodologies in Applied Behavioral Research: Don't Throw Out the Baby with the Bath Water,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 1988, pp. 281–286.
- Farber, M.L. “The College Student as Laboratory Animal,” The American Psychologist, 7, 1952, p. 102.
- Gordon, M.E., L.A. Slade, and N. Schmitt. “The ‘Science of the Sophomore’ Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism,” Academy of Management Review, 11:1, 1986, pp. 191–207.
- Greenberg. J. “The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight,” Academy of Management Review, 12:1, 1987, pp. 157–159.
- Hughes, C.T. and M.L. Gibson. “Students as Surrogates for Managers in a Decision-making Environment: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 8:2, Fall 1991, pp. 153–166.
- LaTour, M., P.J. Champagne, and R. Behling. “Do Students Represent a Viable Source of Data for Researching Business Social Responsibility and Ethical Issues?” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1990, pp. 26–29.
- McAuliffe, T.P. and C.S. Shamlin. Critical Information Network: The Next Generation of Executive Information Systems, Boston: McAuliffe, 1992.
- McNemar, Q. “Opinion Attitude Methodology,” Psychological Bulletin, 43, 1946, pp. 289–374.
- Mowen, M.M. and J.C. Mowen. “An Empirical Examination of the Biasing Effects of Framing on Business Decisions,” Decision Sciences, 17, 1986, pp. 596–602.
- SAS/STAT User's Guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1990.
- Sears, D.O. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:3, 1986, pp. 515–530.
- Slade, L.A. and M.E. Gordon. “On the Virtues of Laboratory Babies and Student Bath Water: A Reply to Dobbins, Lane, and Steiner,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 1988, pp. 373–376.
- Zelditch, M. and W.M. Evans. “Simulated Bureaucracies: A Methodological Analysis.” In Geutzkow, H. (Ed.). Simulation in Social Science: Readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962, pp. 48–60.