Designing a Web-Based Multi-Criteria Group Support System (MCGSS)

References

• Chung, K.J. and H.K. Park. “Examining the Conflicting Results of GDSS Research,” Information & Management, 33, 1998, pp. 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G. and B. Gallupe. “Group Decision Support Systems: A New Frontier.” In Sprague, Jr., R.H. and H.J. Watson (Eds.). Decision Support Systems: Putting Theory into Practice, 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989, pp. 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J. and S.R. Hiltz. “An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 15:3, 1998, pp. 7–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E.H. and K. Peniwati. “Aggregating Individual Judgments and Priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Vancouver, Canada, 1996, pp. 383–391.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. and J.F. Nunamaker. “Group Decision Support Systems.” In Sprague, Jr., R.H. and H.J. Watson (Eds.). Decision Support Systems: Putting Theory into Practice, 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989, pp. 272–287.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. “Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate,” Harvard Business Review, 68:4, 1990, pp. 104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R.L. and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, G. and S. Noronha. “Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 1999, pp. 251–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla, M. and P. Gray. “Is IS Research Relevant?” Information Resources Management, 11, 1998, pp. 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mustajoki, J. and R.P. Hamalainen. “Web-HIPRE: Global Decision Support by Value Tree and AHP Analysis,” INFOR, 38, 2000, pp. 208–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. and L.S. Ganesh. “Group Preferences Aggregation Method Employed in AHP: An Evaluation and Intrinsic Process for Deriving Members' Weightages,” European Journal of Operational Research, 79, 1994, pp. 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, D. “Groups that Work Apart: Implications of Computer-mediated Communications,” Proceedings of the ASAC-IFSAM 2000 Conference, 21:4, Montreal, Canada, 2000, pp. 174–188.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. “Group Decision Making and the AHP.” In Golden, B.L., E.A. Wasil, and P.T. Harker (Eds.). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Application and Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Salo, A. and R.P. Hamalainen. “On the Measurement of Preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 1997, pp. 309–343.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter, V. Decision Support systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Sisos, Y. and A. Spyridakos. “Intelligent Multicriteria Decision Support: Overview and Perspectives,” European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 1999, pp. 236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team Expert Choice™. Group Decision Support Software. Expert Choice, Inc., 5001 Baum Blvd., Suite 430, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M.E., L. Sayeed, and R. Hightower. “Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System,” Decision Sciences, 28, 1997, pp. 975–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.R. and R.L. Wilson. “Group Support Systems, Power, and Influence in an Organization: A Field Study,” Decision Sciences, 28, 1997, pp. 911–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahir, S. “Clusters in a Group: Decision Making in the Vector Space Formulations of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 1999, pp. 620–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahir, S. “Geometry of Decision Making and the Vector Space Formulation of the AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 1999, pp. 373–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahir, S. “Synthesizing Intensities of Group Preferences in Public Policy Decisions Using the AHP: Is It the Time for New Democracy?” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16, 1999, pp. 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar