Towards Innovative Design Research in Information Systems

References

• Aalst, W. and Kumar, A., “XML-based schema definition for support of interorganizational workflow,” Information Systems Research, 14:(1), 2003, 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W. L., Love, P. E. D., Standing, C. and Gharavi, H., “Intention to e-collaborate: propagation of research propositions,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106:(1/2), 2006, 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. and Han, I., “Combinatorial auction based collaborative procurement,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47:(3), 2007, 118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, S. J., Hale, J. G., Lukose, S. and Strong, J., “Information extraction agents for service-oriented architecture using Web service systems: A framework,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48:(3), 2008, 74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DR-AIS, Design Research in Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, 2007, <http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/> [accessed March 2, 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, R., Theory Building, revised edition, Free Press, London, UK, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• GoogleBlogger, <http://www.blogger.com> [accessed March 2, 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., “The nature of theory in information systems,” MIS Quarterly, 30:(3), 2006, 611–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. and Jones, D., “The anatomy of a design theory,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8:(5), 2007, 312–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenci, R. T., “An adaptable customer decision support system for custom configurations,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45:(2), 2004, 56–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawryszkiewycz, I. T., “A metamodel for modeling collaborative systems,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45:(3), 2005, 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J. and Ram, S. “Design science in information systems research,” MIS Quarterly, 28:(1), 2004, 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITAA, Information Technology Association of America, <http://www.itaa.org> [accessed March 2, 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Jarvinen, P., On Research Methods, Opinpajan Kirja, Tampere, Finland, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kuechler, W. and Vaishnavi, V., “On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project,” European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 2008, 489–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, B., Yu, W., Maguluru, N. and Nichols, M., “Enhancing business networks using social network based virtual communities,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106:(1/2), 2006, 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. S. and Hubona, G. S., “A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research,” MIS Quarterly, 33:(2), 2009, 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, T., “Philosophy of design: A meta-theoretical structure for design theory,” Design Studies, 21, 2000, 293–313.
   Google Scholar
• March, S. T. and Smith, G., “Design and natural science research on information technology,” Decision Support Systems, 15:(4), 1995, 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A. and Gasser, L., “A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes,” MIS Quarterly, 26:(3), 2002, 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazemi, A. and Wang, S., “The impact of information presentation modes on decision making: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 5:(3), 1989, 101–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., Suk, F. F. C. and Ng, C. C., “Design of an RFID-based healthcare management system using an information system design theory,” Information Systems Frontiers, 11:(4), 2009, 405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. and Iacono, C. S., “Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact,” Information Systems Research, 12:(2), 2001, 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, C., “Design research: Building the knowledge base,” Journal of the Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 5:(2), 1997, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Papazoglou, M. P. and Georgakopoulos, D., “Service-oriented computing: Introduction,” Communications of the ACM, 46:(10), 2003, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A. and Chatterjee, S., “A design science research methodology for information systems research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 24:(3), 2008, 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. and Willcocks, L., “Critical success factors in international ERP implementations: A case research approach,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47:(3), 2007, 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K., Unended Quest an Intellectual Autobiography, Fontana, Glasgow, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R., “The design theory nexus,” MIS Quarterly, 32:(4), 2008, 731–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, C. and Grandon, E., “An exploratory examination of factors affecting online sales,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:(3), 2002, 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H., The Science of the Artificial, 2nd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H., The Science of the Artificial, 3rd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, H., et al. “Modeling design processes,” AI Magazine, 11:(4), 1990, 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., Yen, D. and Fang, X., “Internet integrated customer relationship management: A key success factor for companies in the e-commerce arena,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:(3), 2001, 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichy, W., “Should computer scientists experiment more?” IEEE Computer, 31:(5), 1998, 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vaishnavi, V., and Kuechler, W., Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology, Auerbach, New York, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R. and El Sawy, O. A., “Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS,” Information Systems Research, 3:(1), 1992, 36–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R. and El Sawy, O. A., “Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 rendition?” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Practice, 6:(2), 2004, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. and Wang, S., “A knowledge management approach to data mining process for business intelligence,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108:(5), 2008, 622–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., Sauer, J., and Schmeink, C., “Time for a design turn in IS innovation research? A practice report from home front,” Information Technology & People, 22:(4), 2009, 335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., “Toward a theory of artifacts: a paradigmatic base for information systems research,” Journal of Information Systems, 1:(2), 1987, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R., “Editor's comments: still desperately seeking the IT artifact,” MIS Quarterly, 27:(2), 2003, iii-xi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedman, J., “Client as designer in collaborative design science research project: what does social science design theory tell us?” European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 2008, 476–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Yu, P., Piatesky-Shapiro, G., et al. “Data mining : How research meets practical development?” Knowledge and Information Systems, 5:(2), 2000, 248–261.
   Google Scholar
• Zmud, R., “Editor's comments,” MIS Quarterly, 21:(2), 1997, xxi-xxii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar