Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus

References

• Awad, N. F. and Krishnan, M. S., “The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization,” MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 2006, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y., “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 1988, 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin, S. J., and Lohse, G. L., “International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers,” Information Society, 20(5), 2004, 313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., “Regulating Privacy: data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States,” Cornell University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, New Jersey, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J. and Armstrong, P. K., “Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation,” Organization Science, 10(1), 1999, 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J. and Bies, R. J., “Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice consideration,” Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 2003, 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3 (September)), 1989, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., and Colautti, C., “Privacy Calculus Model in E-commerce — a Study of Italy and the United States,” European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 2006, 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T. and Hart, P., “An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions,” Information Systems Research, 17(1), 2006, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W., “Toward a unified conception of business ethics: integrative social contracts theory,” Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 1994, 252–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunfee, T. W., Smith, N. C., and Ross, W. T., “Social contracts and marketing ethics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 63(July), 1999, 14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. and Larcker, D., “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 1981, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D., “Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model,” MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 2003, 51–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Warkentin, M., Pavlou, P., and Rose, G., “EGoverment adoption,” AMCIS 2002, 2002, 83
   Google Scholar
• Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S.-Y. T., and Png, I. P. L., “Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 2007, 13–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann, I. H., Hui, K. L., Lee, T. S., and Png, I. P. L., “Online information privacy: measuring the cost-benefit trade-Off,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2002, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., and Peralta, M. A., “Information privacy in the marketspace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web,” Information Society, 15(2), 1999, 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, K. L., Tan, B. C. Y., and Goh, C. Y., “Online information disclosure: motivators and measurements,” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 6(4), 2006, 415–441.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, K. L., Teo, H. H., and Lee, S. Y. T., “The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment,” MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 2007, 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z. and Benbasat, I., “Research note investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations,” Information Systems Research, 18(4), 2007, 454–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., and Rao, H. R., “A trust-based consumer decision model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents,” Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 2008, 544–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudon, K. C., “Markets and privacy,” Communications of the ACM, 39(9), 1996, 92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, R. S. and Wolfe, M., “Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional development theory,” Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 1977, 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., and Cheung, C. M. K., “How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance,” MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 2008, 705–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Agarwal, J., “Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model,” Information Systems Research, 15(4), 2004, 336–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, S. T., “On the status and contribution of Westin's and Altman's theories of privacy,” Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 2003, 411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., “Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology,” Information Systems Research, 13(3), 2002, 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., “Privacy, trust, and disclosure: exploring barriers to electronic commerce,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4), 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., and Burke, S. J., “Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation,” Organization Science, 11(1), 2000, 35–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milberg, S. J. B. J. S., Smith, H. J., and Kallman, A. E., “Values, Personal Information Privacy Concerns, and Regulatory Approaches,” Communication of the ACM, 38(12), 1995, 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S. and Gupta, R., “A task-based model of perceived website complexity,” MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 2008, 501–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A. and Chellappa, R. K., The Role of Perceived Privacy and Perceived Security in the Development of Trust in Electronic Commerce Transactions, Marshall School of Business, USC, Los Angeles., 2001.
   Google Scholar
• PEW-Internet, Pew Internet & American Life Project: Demographics of Internet Users, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J., Nowak, G., and Ferrell, E., “Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information,” Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 19(1), 2000, 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., and Bauer, D. J., Probing interactions in multiple linear regression, latent curve analysis, and hierarchical linear modeling Interactive calculation tools for establishing simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., and Burke, S. J., “Information Privacy measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices,” MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 1996, 167–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J., “A Taxonomy of Privacy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 2006, 477–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J.-Y. and Kim, S. S., “Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model,” MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 2008, 503–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. A. and Segars, A. H., “An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument,” Information Systems Research, 13(1), 2002, 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L., The effects of the valence of outcomes for providing data and the perceived relevance of the data requested on privacy-related behaviors, beliefs and attitudes, Purdue University, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., and McClure, S., “A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 1983, 459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teltzrow, M. and Kobsa, A., Impacts of user privacy preferences on personalized systems: A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherland, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tietje, B. C., “When do rewards have enhancement effects? An availability valence approach,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 2002, 363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USC, Online World As Important to Internet Users as Real World?, Center for the Digital Future, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., and Jiang, J., “Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 2006, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., and Tang, T.-I., “Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study,” Journal: International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 2003, 501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F., Privacy and Freedom, Atheneum, New York, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., and Hart, P., “Examining the formation of individual's privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view,” Proceedings of 29th Annual International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2008), Paris, France, 2008.
   Google Scholar